Enhanced Screening and Research Data Collection via Automated EHR Data Capture and Early Identification of Sepsis.

Health Level Seven (HL7) critical care electronic health records (EHR) severe sepsis

Journal

SAGE open nursing
ISSN: 2377-9608
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Nurs
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101724853

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
received: 22 12 2018
revised: 01 03 2019
accepted: 20 04 2019
entrez: 8 1 2021
pubmed: 24 5 2019
medline: 24 5 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinical research in sepsis patients often requires gathering large amounts of longitudinal information. The electronic health record can be used to identify patients with sepsis, improve participant study recruitment, and extract data. The process of extracting data in a reliable and usable format is challenging, despite standard programming language. The aims of this project were to explore infrastructures for capturing electronic health record data and to apply criteria for identifying patients with sepsis. We conducted a prospective feasibility study to locate and capture/abstract electronic health record data for future sepsis studies. We located parameters as displayed to providers within the system and then captured data transmitted in Health Level Seven® interfaces between electronic health record systems into a prototype database. We evaluated our ability to successfully identify patients admitted with sepsis in the target intensive care unit (ICU) at two cross-sectional time points and then over a 2-month period. A majority of the selected parameters were accessible using an iterative process to locate and abstract them to the prototype database. We successfully identified patients admitted to a 20-bed ICU with sepsis using four data interfaces. Retrospectively applying similar criteria to data captured for 319 patients admitted to ICU over a 2-month period was less sensitive in identifying patients admitted directly to the ICU with sepsis. Classification into three admission categories (sepsis, no-sepsis, and other) was fair (Kappa .39) when compared with manual chart review. This project confirms reported barriers in data extraction. Data can be abstracted for future research, although more work is needed to refine and create customizable reports. We recommend that researchers engage their information technology department to electronically apply research criteria for improved research screening at the point of ICU admission. Using clinical electronic health records data to classify patients with sepsis over time is complex and challenging.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33415243
doi: 10.1177/2377960819850972
pii: 10.1177_2377960819850972
pmc: PMC7774418
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2377960819850972

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct;19(10):e495-e503
pubmed: 30052552
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):793-5
pubmed: 25635347
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Nurs Manage. 2015 Dec;46(12):33-6
pubmed: 26583338
N Engl J Med. 2010 Feb 4;362(5):382-5
pubmed: 20042745
JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):62-75
pubmed: 29297082
Med Care. 2014 Jun;52(6):e39-43
pubmed: 23001437
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):775-87
pubmed: 26903336
Nat Rev Genet. 2012 May 02;13(6):395-405
pubmed: 22549152
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 05;14:105
pubmed: 25476738
Crit Care Resusc. 2013 Sep;15(3):162-71
pubmed: 23944201
Clin Transl Sci. 2011 Oct;4(5):338-45
pubmed: 22029805
Emerg Med J. 2010 Oct;27(10):786-7
pubmed: 20515907
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1301-11
pubmed: 25776532
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0198847
pubmed: 30059504
Fam Pract. 2010 Feb;27(1):121-6
pubmed: 19828572
Med Care Res Rev. 2009 Dec;66(6):611-38
pubmed: 19279318
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8 Suppl 3):S30-7
pubmed: 23774517
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009487
pubmed: 26700284
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Sep;31(9):1153-60
pubmed: 15909169
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;18(5):639-44
pubmed: 21508415
Crit Care Med. 2003 Apr;31(4):1250-6
pubmed: 12682500
Comput Inform Nurs. 2003 Jan-Feb;21(1):22-6; quiz 27-8
pubmed: 12544151
Trials. 2014 Jul 11;15:283
pubmed: 25015838
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jul;31(7):914-21
pubmed: 15909168
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2007 Sep;9(5):382-6
pubmed: 17880848
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):502-9
pubmed: 21946660
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Apr;13(2):191-200
pubmed: 23570430
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2703-11
pubmed: 27367877
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553
pubmed: 29286945
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Mar-Apr;31(2):103-10
pubmed: 25385815
Am J Med Qual. 2016 Nov;31(6):501-508
pubmed: 26491116
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 Oct;12(10):1514-9
pubmed: 26288388
N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1683-93
pubmed: 24635773

Auteurs

Reba Umberger (R)

Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, College of Nursing, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA.

Chayawat Yo Indranoi (CY)

University Health System, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Melanie Simpson (M)

University Health System, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Rose Jensen (R)

University Health System, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

James Shamiyeh (J)

University Health System, The University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, USA.

Sachin Yende (S)

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Classifications MeSH