Characterizing spoken responses in masked-onset priming of reading aloud using articulography.
Analyses/methods
Articulation
Masked priming
Reaction time
Reading
Speech production
Journal
Memory & cognition
ISSN: 1532-5946
Titre abrégé: Mem Cognit
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0357443
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
accepted:
25
10
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
29
7
2021
entrez:
8
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A key method for studying articulatory planning at different levels of phonological organization is masked-onset priming. In previous work using that paradigm the dependent variable has been acoustic response time (RT). We used electromagnetic articulography to measure articulatory RTs and the articulatory properties of speech gestures in non-word production in a masked-onset priming experiment. Initiation of articulation preceded acoustic response onset by 199 ms, but the acoustic lag varied by up to 63 ms, depending on the phonological structure of the target. Onset priming affected articulatory response latency, but had no effect on gestural duration, inter-gestural coordination, or articulatory velocity. This is consistent with an account of the masked-onset priming effect in which the computation from orthography of an abstract phonological representation of the target is initiated earlier in the primed than in the unprimed condition. We discuss the implications of these findings for models of speech production and the scope of articulatory planning and execution.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33415714
doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01114-5
pii: 10.3758/s13421-020-01114-5
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
613-630Subventions
Organisme : Australian Research Council
ID : DE150100318
Références
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2):12–28.
Baguley, T., & Kaye, W. (2010). Review of: Understanding psychology as a science: an introduction to scientific and statistical inference, by Z. Dienes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63(3), 695–69.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonological assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146–184.
Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R. (1998). Orthographic, phonological and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1705–1719.
pubmed: 9861718
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
pubmed: 11212628
Cortese, M. J. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory & Languange, 39, 652–665.
Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 416.
pubmed: 12776752
Davis, C., Proctor, M., Shaw, J., Derrick, D., & Kroos, C. (2013). Using electromagnetic articulography to examine masked-onset priming. Proc. 40th Australasian Experimental Psychology Conference, 3–6 April, Adelaide, 16.
Davis, C., Shaw, J., Sherwood, S., Proctor, M., Kim, J. & Derrick, D. (2015). Examining speech production using masked priming. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 10–14). Glasgow: International Phonetic Association.
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: an introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dienes, Z. (2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psycholology, 5, 781.
Dienes, Z., & McLatchie, N. (2018). Four reasons to prefer Bayesian over significance testing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 207–218.
Drake, E., & Corley, M. (2015). Effects in production of word pre-activation during listening: Are listener-generated predictions specified at a speech-sound level? Memory & Cognition, 43(1), 111–120.
Fink, A., Oppenheim, G. M., & Goldrick, M. (2018). Interactions between lexical access and articulation. Language, cognition and neuroscience, 33(1), 12–24.
pubmed: 29399594
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1991). The density constraint on form-priming in the naming task: Interference effects from a masked prime. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 1–25.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 116–124.
Fowler, C. A. & Saltzman, E. (1993). Coordination and coarticulation in speech production. Language and Speech, 36, 171–195.
pubmed: 8277807
Garcia, D. (2010). Robust smoothing of gridded data in one and higher dimensions with missing values. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 54(4), 1167–1178.
Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 649–683.
Goldstein, L., & Fowler, C. A. (2003). Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In N. Schiller & A. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 159–207). Berlin: Mouton.
Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2007). Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition, 103(3), 386–412.
pubmed: 16822494
Hawkins S, & Nguyen N. (2004). Influence of syllable-coda voicing on the acoustic properties of syllable-onset /l/ in English. Journal of Phonetics, 32(2), 199–231.
Holbrook, B. B., Kawamoto, A. H., & Liu, Q. (2019). Task demands and segment priming effects in the naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 807–821.
pubmed: 30024251
Hoole, P., Mooshammer, C. & Tillmann, H. G. (1994). Kinematic analysis of vowel production in German. 3rd Intl. Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) 94, 53–56.
Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Jones, R., & Bame, K. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole-word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 862–885
Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A. (2008). Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 347–365.
Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Lee, R. J., & Grebe, P. R. (2014). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: Evidence based on absolute response latencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(12), 2340–2359.
Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., & Kello, C. T. (2015). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production and reading aloud: evidence and implications. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1457.
Kessler, B., Treiman, R., & Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 145–171.
Kinoshita, S. (2000). The left-to-right nature of the masked-onset priming effect in naming. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 133–141.
Krause, P. A., & Kawamoto, A. H. (2020). On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(6), e12373.
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2018). The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(1), 178–206.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Ladefoged, P., Silverstein, R., & Papçun, G. (1973). Interruptibility of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54(4), 1105–1108.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological review, 74(6), 431.
pubmed: 4170865
Liu, Qiang, Kawamoto, Alan, Payne, Katherine & Dorsey, Genvieve. (2018). Anticipatory Coarticulation and the Minimal Planning Unit of Speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 44, 139–153.
Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. T. (1994). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331–353.
McMillan, C. T., & Corley, M. (2010). Cascading influences on the production of speech: Evidence from articulation. Cognition, 117(3), 243–260.
pubmed: 20947071
pmcid: 2967621
Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Häcker, C., & Mortensen, L. (2007). Use of word length information in utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 210–231.
Monsell, S. (1986). Programming of complex sequences: Evidence from the timing of rapid speech and other productions. In H. Heuer & C. Fromm (Eds.), Generation and modulation of action patterns (pp. 72-86). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag
Morey, R. D. & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes Factors for Common Designs. R package version 0.9.12–4.2. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html
Mousikou, P., Coltheart, M., Finkbeiner, M. & Saunders, S. (2010a). Can the DRC computational model of reading offer a valid account of the masked-onset priming effect? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 984–1003.
Mousikou, B., Coltheart, M., & Saunders, S. (2010b). Computational modelling of the masked-onset priming effect in reading aloud. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 725–763.
Perkell, J. S., Cohen, M. H., Svirsky, M. A., Matthies, M. L., Garabieta, I. & Jackson, M. T. (1992). Electromagnetic midsagittal articulometer systems for transducing speech articulatory movements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3078–3096.
pubmed: 1474223
Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 307–314.
pubmed: 11999856
Rastle, K., Croot, K., Harrington, J. & Coltheart, M. (2005). Characterizing the motor execution stage of speech production: Consonantal effects on delayed naming latency and onset duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1083–1095.
pubmed: 16262500
Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 non-words: The ARC Nonword Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1339–1362.
Rastle, K., Harrington, J.M., Coltheart, M. and Palethorpe, S. (2000). Reading aloud begins when the computation of phonology finishes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1178-1191.
pubmed: 10884016
Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249-284.
pubmed: 9426503
Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological Psychology, 1(4), 333–382.
Saltzman, E. L., & Munhall, K. G. (1989). A dynamical approach to gestural patterning in speech production. Ecological psychology, 1(4), 333–382.
Schiller, N. O. (1998). The effect of visually masked syllable primes on the naming latencies of words and pictures. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 484–507.
Schiller, N. O. (2000). Single word production in English: The role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 512–528.
pubmed: 10764109
Schiller, N. O., & Costa, A. (2006). Activation of segments, not syllables, during phonological encoding in speech production. The Mental Lexicon, 1(2), 231–250.
Schiller, N. O. (2007). Phonology and orthography in reading aloud. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 460–465.
Singh, A. (2018). Bayes factor (Dienes) calculator. Retrieved from https://medstats.github.io/bayesfactor.html . Accessed 19 June 2019.
Sternberg, S., Knoll, R. L., Monsell, S., & Wright, C. E. (1988). Motor programs and hierarchical organization in the control of rapid speech. Phonetica, 45, 175–197.
Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R., & Wright, C. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). New York: Academic Press.
Sulpizio, S., & Burani, C. (2015). Article Commentary: Reading segments is not reading words: Comment on Kawamoto et al. (2014). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(3), 619–621.
Sulpizio, S., Spinelli, G., & Burani, C. (2015). Stress affects articulatory planning in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 453.
pubmed: 25602969
Tiede, M., Bundgaard-Nielsen, R., Kroos, C., Gibert, G., Attina, V., Kasisopa, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Best, C. (2010). Speech articulator movements recorded from facing talkers using two electromagnetic articulometer systems simultaneously. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 11(1), 60007. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4772388 .
Tilsen, S., & Goldstein, L. (2012). Articulatory gestures are individually selected in production. Journal of Phonetics, 40(6), 764–779.
Tilsen, S., Spincemaille, P., Xu, B., Doerschuk, P., Luh, W. M., Feldman, E., & Wang, Y. (2016). Anticipatory posturing of the vocal tract reveals dissociation of speech movement plans from linguistic units. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146813
Vasishth, S., Nicenboim, B., Beckman, M. E., Li, F., & Kong, E. J. (2018). Bayesian data analysis in the phonetic sciences: A tutorial introduction. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 147–161. Elsevier.
Whalen, D. H. (1990). Coarticulation is largely planned. Journal of Phonetics, 18(1), 3–35.
Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482.