Association of Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer and Second Gynecological Malignant Neoplasms.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 01 2021
04 01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
8
1
2021
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
13
3
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Radiotherapy is a common treatment for rectal cancer, yet the risk of second gynecological malignant neoplasms (SGMNs) in patients with rectal cancer undergoing radiotherapy have not been adequately studied. To investigate the association between radiotherapy and the risk of individual types of SGMN in patients with rectal cancer and assess survival outcomes. A large population-based cohort study was designed to identify the risk of SGMNs in patients with rectal cancer diagnosed from January 1973 to December 2015. The statistical analysis was conducted from September 2019 to April 2020. The study was based on the 9 cancer registries of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A total of 20 142 female patients with rectal cancer in localized and regional stage were included. Receipt of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer. The development of an SGMN defined as any type of GMN occurring more than 5 years after the diagnosis of rectal cancer. The cumulative incidence of SGMNs was estimated by Fine-Gray competing risk regression. Poisson regression was used to evaluate the radiotherapy-associated risk for SGMNs in patients undergoing radiotherapy vs patients not undergoing radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess the survival outcomes of patients with SGMNs. Of 20 142 patients, 16 802 patients (83.4%) were White and the median age was 65 years (interquartile range, 54-74 years). A total of 5310 (34.3%) patients were treated with surgery and radiotherapy, and 14 832 (65.7%) patients were treated with surgery alone. The cumulative incidence of SGMNs during 30 years of follow-up was 4.53% among patients who received radiotherapy and 1.53% among patients who did not. In competing risk regression analysis, undergoing radiotherapy was associated with a higher risk of developing cancer of the uterine corpus (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.06; 95% CI, 2.14-4.37; P < .001) and ovarian cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.22-3.56; P = .007) compared with those who did not receive radiotherapy. The dynamic radiotherapy-associated risks (RR) for cancer of the uterine corpus significantly increased with increasing age at rectal cancer diagnosis (aged 20-49 years: adjusted RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.35-1.79; P = .57; aged 50-69 years: adjusted RR, 3.74; 95% CI, 2.63-5.32; P < .001; aged ≥70 years: adjusted RR, 5.13; 95% CI, 2.64-9.97; P < .001) and decreased with increasing latency since rectal cancer diagnosis (60-119 months: adjusted RR, 3.22; 95% CI, 2.12-4.87; P < .001; 120-239 months: adjusted RR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.75-4.24; P < .001; 240-360 months: adjusted RR, 1.95; 95% CI, 0.67-5.66; P = .22), but the dynamic RR for ovarian cancer increased with increasing latency since rectal cancer diagnosis (60-119 months: adjusted RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.26-1.89; P = .48; 120-239 months: adjusted RR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.09-4.70; P = .03; 240-360 months: adjusted RR, 11.84; 95% CI, 2.18-64.33; P = .004). The 10-year overall survival among patients with radiotherapy-associated cancer of the uterine corpus was significantly lower than that among matched patients with primary cancer of the uterine corpus (21.5% vs 33.6%; P = .01). Radiotherapy for rectal cancer was associated with an increased risk of cancer of the uterine corpus and ovarian cancer. Special attention should be paid to reduce radiotherapy-associated SGMNs and improve their prognosis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33416884
pii: 2774717
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31661
pmc: PMC7794669
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2031661Références
Radiat Res. 2007 Jul;168(1):1-64
pubmed: 17722996
BMJ. 2016 Mar 02;352:i851
pubmed: 26936410
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct 28;24(40):4586-4595
pubmed: 30386108
Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20
pubmed: 19269519
Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug;30(4):333-9
pubmed: 17762431
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6126-31
pubmed: 16135478
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Apr;123(1):139-146
pubmed: 28285840
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Apr;12(4):353-60
pubmed: 21454129
Cancer Treat Rev. 2018 Jul;68:136-144
pubmed: 29957373
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):319-328
pubmed: 30293908
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Sep 1;72(1):58-68
pubmed: 18374503
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Mar 7;104(5):357-70
pubmed: 22312134
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Feb;19(2):464-74
pubmed: 20142245
Ann Oncol. 2017 Mar 1;28(3):535-540
pubmed: 27993790
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 20;30(30):3734-45
pubmed: 23008293
J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 20;33(15):1640-6
pubmed: 25534376
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun;140(6):949-55
pubmed: 24663823
N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):638-46
pubmed: 11547717
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 1;29(34):4510-5
pubmed: 22025166
Br J Surg. 2017 Feb;104(3):278-287
pubmed: 27802358
Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985 Mar-Apr;24(2):145-51
pubmed: 2988277
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33
pubmed: 22529255