Periosteal expansion osteogenesis using an innovative, shape-memory polyethylene terephthalate membrane: An experimental study in rabbits.
Absorbable Implants
Animals
Bone Screws
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
/ chemistry
Durapatite
/ chemistry
Humans
Osteogenesis
Osteogenesis, Distraction
Periosteum
Polyethylene Terephthalates
/ chemistry
Rabbits
Skull
Surgical Mesh
Tissue Engineering
Tissue Scaffolds
/ chemistry
Titanium
/ chemistry
bone augmentation
distraction osteogenesis
hydroxy(1)lapatite
periosteum
polyethylene terephthalate
Journal
Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials
ISSN: 1552-4981
Titre abrégé: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101234238
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2021
09 2021
Historique:
revised:
05
12
2020
received:
03
08
2020
accepted:
27
12
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
entrez:
8
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Periosteal expansion osteogenesis (PEO) results in the formation of new bone in the gap between periosteum and original bone. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) membrane as an activation device. A dome-shaped PET membrane coated with hydroxyapatite/gelatin on the inner side was inserted between the elevated periosteum and bone at the rabbit calvaria. In the experimental group, the membrane was pushed, bent, and attached to the bone surface and fixed with a titanium screw. In control group, the membrane was only inserted and fixed with titanium screw at original shape under the periosteum. After 7 days, the screw was removed and the mesh was activated in the experimental group. Three animals per group with or without setting a latency period for activation were sacrificed at 3 and 5 weeks after surgery. Bone formation was evaluated via micro-computed tomography and determined by histomorphometric methods and histological evaluation. No PET membrane-associated complications were observed during this study. The quantitative data by the area and the occupation of newly formed bone indicated that the experimental group had a higher volume of new bone than the control group at 3 weeks after surgery. Histologically, bone formation progressed to areas adjacent to the cortical perforations; many sinusoidal vessels ran from the perforations to overlying fibrous tissue via the new bone. No bone or obvious inflammatory cells were observed over the membrane. The PET membrane has biocompatible device for PEO that induces a natural osteogenic response at the gap between the original bone and periosteum.
Substances chimiques
Coated Materials, Biocompatible
0
Polyethylene Terephthalates
0
Durapatite
91D9GV0Z28
Titanium
D1JT611TNE
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1327-1333Informations de copyright
© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Sethi A, Kaus T. Ridge augmentation using mandibular block bone grafts: preliminary results of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:378-388.
Triplett RG, Schow SR. Autologous bone grafts and endosseous implants: complementary techniques. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:486-494.
Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1. 1989;239:263-285.
Chin M, Toth BA. Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;54:45-53.
Takahashi T, Funaki K, Shintani H, Haruoka T. Use of horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement in a narrow alveolar ridge: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:291-294.
Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Nogami S, Kataoka Y, Miyamoto I, Funaki K. Horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant: long-term results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24:563-568.
Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Tanaka K, et al. Selfactivated mesh device using shape memory alloy for periosteal expansion osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2013;101:736-742.
Kessler P, Bumiller L, Schlegel A, Birkholz T, Neukam FW, Wiltfang J. Dynamic periosteal elevation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;45:284-287.
Schmidt BL, Kung L, Jones C, Casap N. Induced osteogenesis by periosteal distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;60:1170-1175.
Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Funaki K, Yamashita Y. Periosteal expansion osteogenesis using highly purified beta-tricalcium phosphate blocks: a pilot study in dogs. J Periodontol. 2008;79:999-1005.
Yamauchi K, Takahashi T, Funaki K, Hamada Y, Yamashita Y. Histological and histomorphometrical comparative study of b-tricalcium phosphate block grafts and periosteal expansion osteogenesis for alveolar bone augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;39:1000-1006.
Yamauchi K, Nogami S, Cruz G, et al. Timed-release system for periosteal expansion osteogenesis using NiTi mesh and absorbable metal in the rabbit calvaria. J Oral Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 2016;44:1366-1372.
Krudwig WK. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using alloplastic ligament of polyethylene terephthalate (PET-Trevira-Hochfest): follow up study. Bio-Med Matter Eng. 2002;12:59-67.
Ma Z, Kotaki M, Yong T, He W, Ramakrishna S. Surface engineering of electrospun polyethylene terephthalate (PET) nanofibers towards development of a new material for blood vessel engineering. Biomaterials. 2005;26:2527-2536.
Furusawa T, Sato M, Okudera T, Matsushima Y, Unuma H. Proliferation and calcification of MC3T3-E1 cells on surface-modified poly (ethyleneterephtalate) with gelatin and calcium phosphate. J Jpn Soc Oral Implant. 2012;25:699-707.
Maruyama K, Ogiso M, Mineno S, Ono W, Izumi Y. Histological changes in alveolar bone after on lay augmentation using the casing method. Anat Rec. 2018;301:1148-1158.
Zakaria O, Kon K, Kasugai S. Evaluation of a biodegradable novel periosteal distractor. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012;100:882-889.
Zakaria O, Madi M, Kasugai S. Induced osteogenesis using a new periosteal distractor. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:225-234.
Zakaria O, Madi M, Kasugai S. Introduction of a novel guided bone regeneration memory shape based device. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020;108:460-467.
Oda T, Kinoshita K, Ueda M. Effects of cortical bone perforation on periosteal distraction: an experimental study in the rabbit mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(7):1478-1485.
Sencimen M, Aydintug Y, Ortakoglu K, Karslioglu Y, Gunhan O, Gunaydin Y. Histomorphometrical analysis of new bone obtained by distraction osteogenesis and osteogenesis by periosteal distraction in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(3):235-242.
Saulacic N, Nakahara K, Iizuka T, Haga-Tsujimura M, Hofstetter W, Scolozzi P. Comparison of two protocols of periosteal distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit calvaria model. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016;104(6):1121-1131. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.33461.
Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Role of periosteum in the formation of jaw bone: an experiment in the rat. J Clin Periodontol. 1995;22:247-254.
Weng D, Hürzeler MB, Quiñones CR, Ohlms A, Caffesse RG. Contribution of the periosteum to bone formation in guided bone regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11(6):546-554.
Nijweide PJ, Burger EH, Feyen JH. Cells of bone: proliferation, differentiation, and hormonal regulation. Physiol Rev. 1986;66:855-886.