Assessment of Internet Hospitals in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic: National Cross-Sectional Data Analysis Study.
COVID-19
China
accessibility
control
cross-sectional
digital health
health care
internet hospital
prevention
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 01 2021
20 01 2021
Historique:
received:
29
09
2020
accepted:
03
12
2020
revised:
14
11
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2021
medline:
30
1
2021
entrez:
8
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Internet hospitals in China are being rapidly developed as an innovative approach to providing health services. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has triggered the development of internet hospitals that promote outpatient service delivery to the public via internet technologies. To date, no studies have assessed China's internet hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of China's internet hospitals and assess the health service capacity of these hospitals. Data on 711 internet hospitals were collected from official websites, the WeChat (Tencent Inc) platform, smartphone apps, and the Baidu search engine until July 16, 2020. As of July 16, 2020, 711 internet hospitals were developed in mainland China. More than half of these internet hospitals (421/711, 59.2%) were established during 2019 (206/711, 29%) and 2020 (215/711, 30.2%). Furthermore, about one-third (215/711, 30.2%) of internet hospitals were established at the beginning of 2020 as an emergency response to the COVID-19 epidemic. The 711 internet hospitals consisted of the following 3 types of hospitals: government-oriented (42/711, 5.91%), hospital-oriented (143/711, 20.11%), and enterprise-oriented internet hospitals (526/711, 73.98%). The vast majority of internet hospitals were traditional hospitals (526/711, 74%). Nearly 46.1% (221/711) of internet hospitals requested doctors to provide health services at a specific web clinic. Most patients (224/639, 35.1%) accessed outpatient services via WeChat. Internet hospitals' consulting methods included SMS text messaging consultations involving the use of graphics (552/570, 96.8%), video consultations (248/570, 43.5%), and telephone consultations (238/570, 41.8%). The median number of available web-based doctors was 43, and the median consultation fees of fever clinics and other outpatient clinics were ¥0 (US $0) per consultation and ¥6 (US $0.93) per consultation, respectively. Internet hospitals have provided various services during the COVID-19 pandemic, including medical prescription, drug delivery, and medical insurance services. The dramatic increase of internet hospitals in China has played an important role in the prevention and control of COVID-19. Internet hospitals provide different and convenient medical services for people in need.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Internet hospitals in China are being rapidly developed as an innovative approach to providing health services. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has triggered the development of internet hospitals that promote outpatient service delivery to the public via internet technologies. To date, no studies have assessed China's internet hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of China's internet hospitals and assess the health service capacity of these hospitals.
METHODS
Data on 711 internet hospitals were collected from official websites, the WeChat (Tencent Inc) platform, smartphone apps, and the Baidu search engine until July 16, 2020.
RESULTS
As of July 16, 2020, 711 internet hospitals were developed in mainland China. More than half of these internet hospitals (421/711, 59.2%) were established during 2019 (206/711, 29%) and 2020 (215/711, 30.2%). Furthermore, about one-third (215/711, 30.2%) of internet hospitals were established at the beginning of 2020 as an emergency response to the COVID-19 epidemic. The 711 internet hospitals consisted of the following 3 types of hospitals: government-oriented (42/711, 5.91%), hospital-oriented (143/711, 20.11%), and enterprise-oriented internet hospitals (526/711, 73.98%). The vast majority of internet hospitals were traditional hospitals (526/711, 74%). Nearly 46.1% (221/711) of internet hospitals requested doctors to provide health services at a specific web clinic. Most patients (224/639, 35.1%) accessed outpatient services via WeChat. Internet hospitals' consulting methods included SMS text messaging consultations involving the use of graphics (552/570, 96.8%), video consultations (248/570, 43.5%), and telephone consultations (238/570, 41.8%). The median number of available web-based doctors was 43, and the median consultation fees of fever clinics and other outpatient clinics were ¥0 (US $0) per consultation and ¥6 (US $0.93) per consultation, respectively. Internet hospitals have provided various services during the COVID-19 pandemic, including medical prescription, drug delivery, and medical insurance services.
CONCLUSIONS
The dramatic increase of internet hospitals in China has played an important role in the prevention and control of COVID-19. Internet hospitals provide different and convenient medical services for people in need.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33417586
pii: v23i1e21825
doi: 10.2196/21825
pmc: PMC7819672
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e21825Informations de copyright
©Xingyan Xu, Yingying Cai, Siying Wu, Jianhui Guo, Le Yang, Jieli Lan, Yi Sun, Bingbing Wang, Jieyu Wu, Tinggui Wang, Shuna Huang, Yawen Lin, Yuduan Hu, Mingjun Chen, Xuecai Gao, Xiaoxu Xie. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 20.01.2021.
Références
JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242
pubmed: 32091533
JMIR Med Inform. 2018 Dec 21;6(4):e51
pubmed: 30578195
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Apr 14;22(4):e18908
pubmed: 32250962
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Nov;107:107-119
pubmed: 29029686
Acta Biomed. 2020 Mar 19;91(1):157-160
pubmed: 32191675
J Infect. 2021 Jan;82(1):159-198
pubmed: 32730998
BMJ. 2020 Feb 19;368:m606
pubmed: 32075786
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 8;22(5):e19577
pubmed: 32349962
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 03;7(6):e10299
pubmed: 31162131
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jul 04;19(7):e239
pubmed: 28676472
BMJ. 2020 Mar 20;368:m1141
pubmed: 32198146
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Aug;3(8):e445-e446
pubmed: 26187488
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 Jan;49(3):155-160
pubmed: 32200399