Death's Troubled Relationship With the Law.


Journal

AMA journal of ethics
ISSN: 2376-6980
Titre abrégé: AMA J Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101649265

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 12 2020
Historique:
entrez: 9 1 2021
pubmed: 10 1 2021
medline: 29 7 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Death's legal definition must be responsive to advances in technology, and it must delineate between life and death. But where to draw the line is difficult to determine. Death's current legal definition requires irreversible cessation of cardiorespiratory function or irreversible cessation of all brain function. But technology can often restore some brain functions without restoring consciousness, so brain death is often diagnosed without the irreversibility requirement being met. This article argues that the law should be updated to require

Identifiants

pubmed: 33419507
pii: amajethics.2020.1055
doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2020.1055
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

E1055-1061

Informations de copyright

© 2020 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

Auteurs

Brendan Parent (B)

Assistant professor and the director of transplant ethics and policy research in the Division of Medical Ethics at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York City.

Angela Turi (A)

Research assistant in the Division of Medical Ethics at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine in New York City.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH