Applying the economic concept of profitability to leaves.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 01 2021
Historique:
received: 13 08 2020
accepted: 07 12 2020
entrez: 9 1 2021
pubmed: 10 1 2021
medline: 10 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Economic principles can be extended to biological organisms as they optimize the use of resources, but their use in biology has been limited. We applied concepts from traditional economics to the main production unit of plants, the leaf. We quantified the profitability (profit/cost of investment) of leaves from seven biomes worldwide and compared those to the profitability of companies. Here we demonstrate for the first time key similarities and differences between leaf and human economics. First, there was a weak, but positive relationship between profitability and size, both for leaves and companies. Second, environment has a strong effect on profitability, with high values in leaves from biomes with short growth periods and, for companies associated with innovation. Third, shorter longevity of productive units was related to higher profitability. In summary, by comparing economic behaviours of plants and humans there is potential to develop new perspectives on plant ecological strategies and plant evolution.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33420171
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79709-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-020-79709-w
pmc: PMC7794281
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

49

Références

Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2017 May;19(3):386-395
pubmed: 28054449
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(2):355-71
pubmed: 16303828
AoB Plants. 2019 Apr 16;11(3):plz024
pubmed: 31093323
New Phytol. 2009;182(3):565-88
pubmed: 19434804
Nature. 2004 Apr 22;428(6985):821-7
pubmed: 15103368
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(2):409-19
pubmed: 22066906
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 22;104(21):8891-6
pubmed: 17502616
Ecol Lett. 2014 Jan;17(1):82-91
pubmed: 24215231
Oecologia. 1989 Mar;80(1):53-8
pubmed: 23494345
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 03;8(12):e81873
pubmed: 24312595
New Phytol. 2012 Jan;193(1):30-50
pubmed: 22085245
Science. 2017 Sep 1;357(6354):917-921
pubmed: 28860384
Plant Physiol. 1990 Oct;94(2):621-7
pubmed: 16667757
Am Nat. 2006 Sep;168(3):373-83
pubmed: 16947112
Am Nat. 2000 May;155(5):649-656
pubmed: 10777437
Oecologia. 1990 Jul;83(4):553-559
pubmed: 28313192
Am Nat. 2003 Jan;161(1):98-111
pubmed: 12650465
Oecologia. 1986 May;69(2):296-304
pubmed: 28311374
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):167-71
pubmed: 26700811
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 7;274(1622):2109-14
pubmed: 17591590
New Phytol. 2006;171(1):91-104
pubmed: 16771985
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Jan;14(1):11-16
pubmed: 10234241

Auteurs

Rafael Villar (R)

Area de Ecología, Dpto de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain. rafael.villar@uco.es.

Manuel Olmo (M)

Area de Ecología, Dpto de Botánica, Ecología y Fisiología Vegetal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain.

Pedro Atienza (P)

Departamento de Economía e Historia Económica, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Antonio J Garzón (AJ)

Departamento de Economía e Historia Económica, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Ian J Wright (IJ)

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Hendrik Poorter (H)

Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Plant Sciences (IBG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany.

Luis A Hierro (LA)

Departamento de Economía e Historia Económica, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.

Classifications MeSH