The power of informal cancer caregivers' writings: results from a thematic and narrative analysis.
Expressive writing
Informal caregiver
Narrative analysis
Narrative medicine
Neoplasms
Patient engagement
Storytelling
Thematic analysis
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Aug 2021
Historique:
received:
10
07
2020
accepted:
16
11
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2021
medline:
24
7
2021
entrez:
9
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cancer is a disease that disrupts not only the patient's life, but that of the entire family as well, from a care, organizational, and emotional perspective. Patients share their experience of illness frequently with their informal caregiver (IC), a partner, son/daughter, friend, volunteer, or any other person in the family or social network who offers to support them during their clinical journey. The purpose of this study was to investigate ICs' still unknown cancer experiences through the stories of IC participants in a Literary Artistic Competition the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCSS organized, and understand the themes that emerged from their texts and hence, the power of expressive writing. A qualitative study was carried out on literary texts using Mishler's three levels of narrative analysis: thematic (to detect themes and subthemes); structural (to support the thematic level), and performative (to understand the narratives' meaning). In addition, the narratives were classified based on Kleinman and Frank's models. A particular focus was placed on the language of the narratives to identify figures of speech, e.g., metaphors related to cancer. Seven main themes emerged from the 40 stories' thematic analysis: perceptions of the disease; biographical breakdown; relationships; transformation of the sick body; IC's role; encounter with death; and strength of memory. The ICs' stories also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the patient's clinical pathway. ICs are a resource not only for the patient, who, thanks to them, is assured of continuous assistance but also for the healthcare organization, above all because they serve a relational role as a "bridge" between patients and healthcare workers. ICs have important messages to offer to healthcare organizations. If involved adequately, they can provide a strategic strength in supporting patients and healthcare workers themselves. The in-depth analysis of the themes and subthemes in this study led the authors to hypothesize that expressive writing benefit ICs with respect to the possibility of sharing their experiences with others and giving evidence of their role. Their stories are a testimony that can help those who face a similar experience.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Cancer is a disease that disrupts not only the patient's life, but that of the entire family as well, from a care, organizational, and emotional perspective. Patients share their experience of illness frequently with their informal caregiver (IC), a partner, son/daughter, friend, volunteer, or any other person in the family or social network who offers to support them during their clinical journey. The purpose of this study was to investigate ICs' still unknown cancer experiences through the stories of IC participants in a Literary Artistic Competition the Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCSS organized, and understand the themes that emerged from their texts and hence, the power of expressive writing.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
A qualitative study was carried out on literary texts using Mishler's three levels of narrative analysis: thematic (to detect themes and subthemes); structural (to support the thematic level), and performative (to understand the narratives' meaning). In addition, the narratives were classified based on Kleinman and Frank's models. A particular focus was placed on the language of the narratives to identify figures of speech, e.g., metaphors related to cancer.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Seven main themes emerged from the 40 stories' thematic analysis: perceptions of the disease; biographical breakdown; relationships; transformation of the sick body; IC's role; encounter with death; and strength of memory. The ICs' stories also highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of the patient's clinical pathway. ICs are a resource not only for the patient, who, thanks to them, is assured of continuous assistance but also for the healthcare organization, above all because they serve a relational role as a "bridge" between patients and healthcare workers. ICs have important messages to offer to healthcare organizations. If involved adequately, they can provide a strategic strength in supporting patients and healthcare workers themselves. The in-depth analysis of the themes and subthemes in this study led the authors to hypothesize that expressive writing benefit ICs with respect to the possibility of sharing their experiences with others and giving evidence of their role. Their stories are a testimony that can help those who face a similar experience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33420531
doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05901-3
pii: 10.1007/s00520-020-05901-3
pmc: PMC8236437
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4381-4388Subventions
Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : Ricerca Corrente
Références
Qual Health Res. 2015 Mar;25(3):348-59
pubmed: 25246328
Lancet. 2008 Mar 22;371(9617):980-1
pubmed: 18363204
Palliat Support Care. 2013 Jun;11(3):231-52
pubmed: 23046977
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jul;56(1):98-106
pubmed: 29604380
Sociol Health Illn. 2015 Sep;37(7):1055-71
pubmed: 25923981
JAMA. 2004 Jan 28;291(4):483-91
pubmed: 14747506
CMAJ. 2004 Jun 8;170(12):1795-801
pubmed: 15184333
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Jun;13(3):555-65
pubmed: 24477169
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Sep 1;46(5):617-630
pubmed: 31424447
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2006 Sep;10(4):294-303
pubmed: 16443392
Transl Med UniSa. 2019 Jan 06;19:54-59
pubmed: 31360668
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 5;20(1):1115
pubmed: 32753040
Recenti Prog Med. 2017 Nov;108(11):455-475
pubmed: 29149163
J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care. 2013;9(1):74-95
pubmed: 23438646
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Feb;13(Pt 1):73-6
pubmed: 17958930
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;79(1):64-74
pubmed: 21261435
J Clin Nurs. 2009 May;18(10):1379-93
pubmed: 18624779
Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):345-50
pubmed: 26200577
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Sep;48(3):385-99.e1-2
pubmed: 24291294
J Cancer Educ. 2016 Jun;31(2):405-12
pubmed: 25773134
Can Fam Physician. 2007 Aug;53(8):1265-7
pubmed: 17872831
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;96:78-85
pubmed: 24034954
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2012 Jul;5(3):207-15
pubmed: 22716653
Psychol Health. 2013;28(3):250-66
pubmed: 22928621
J Palliat Care. 2019 Sep 02;:825859719871538
pubmed: 31476955
Palliat Support Care. 2015 Dec;13(6):1735-44
pubmed: 26062657