Efficient measurements for the dynamic range of human lightness perception.
Dynamic range of lightness perception
Hemeralopia
Nyctalopia
Photophobia
Visual adaptation
Journal
Japanese journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1613-2246
Titre abrégé: Jpn J Ophthalmol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 0044652
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
received:
05
06
2020
accepted:
23
10
2020
pubmed:
10
1
2021
medline:
19
8
2021
entrez:
9
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with an eye disease often report nyctalopia, hemianopia, and/or photophobia. We hypothesized that such symptoms are related to the disease impacting the dynamic range of lightness perception (DRL). However, there is currently no standardized approach for measuring DRL for clinical use. We developed an efficient measurement method to estimate DRL. Clinical trial METHODS: Fifty-five photophobic patients with eye disease and 46 controls participated. Each participant judged the appearance of visual stimuli, a thick bar with luminance that gradually changed from maximum to minimum was displayed on uniform background. On different trials the background luminance changed pseudo-randomly between three levels. The participants repeatedly tapped a border on the bar that divided the appearance of grayish white/black and perfect white/black. We defined the DRL as the ratio between the luminance values at the tapped point of the border between gray and white/black. The mean DRL of the patients was approximately 15 dB, significantly smaller than that of the controls (20 dB). The center of each patient's DRL shift depending on background luminance, which we named index of contextual susceptibility (iCS), was significantly larger than controls. The DRL of retinitis pigmentosa was smaller than controls for every luminance condition. Only the iCS of glaucoma was significantly larger than controls. This measurement technique detects an abnormality of the DRL. The results support our hypothesis that the DRL abnormality characterizes lightness-relevant symptoms that may elucidate the causes of nyctalopia, hemeralopia, and photophobia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33420857
doi: 10.1007/s10384-020-00808-2
pii: 10.1007/s10384-020-00808-2
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
432-438Subventions
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : JP18K16939
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
ID : 15dk0310013h0003
Références
Dowling JE, Wald G. Vitamin a Deficiency and Night Blindness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1958;44:648–61.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.44.7.648
Kawamura S, Murakami M. Calcium-dependent regulation of cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase by a protein from frog retinal rods. Nature. 1991;349:420–3.
doi: 10.1038/349420a0
Yau KW. Phototransduction mechanism in retinal rods and cones. The Friedenwald Lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:9–32.
pubmed: 7507907
Vessey JP, Stratis AK, Daniels BA, Da Silva N, Jonz MG, Lalonde MR, et al. Proton-mediated feedback inhibition of presynaptic calcium channels at the cone photoreceptor synapse. J Neurosci. 2005;25:4108–17.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5253-04.2005
Barnes S, Merchant V, Mahmud F. Modulation of trasmission gain by protons at the photoreceptor output synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:10081–5.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10081
Rieke F. Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells. J Neurosci. 2001;21:9445–54.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-23-09445.2001
Kim KJ, Rieke F. Temporal contrast adaptation in the input and output signals of salamander retinal ganglion cells. J Neurosci. 2001;21:287–99.
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-00287.2001
Manookin MB, Demb JB. Presynaptic mechanism for slow contrast adaptation in mammalian retinal ganglion cells. Neuron. 2006;50:453–64.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.039
Brown SP, Masland RH. Spatial scale and cellular substrate of contrast adaptation by retinal ganglion cells. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:44–51.
doi: 10.1038/82888
Ohzawa I, Sclar G, Freeman RD. Contrast gain control in the cat’s visual system. J Neurophysiol. 1985;54:651–67.
doi: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.3.651
Solomon SG, Peirce JW, Dhruv NT, Lennie P. Profound contrast adaptation early in the visual pathway. Neuron. 2004;42:155–62.
doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00178-3
Gardner JL, Sun P, Waggoner RA, Ueno K, Tanaka K, Cheng K. Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex. Neuron. 2005;47:607–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.016
van den Berg TJ. On the relation between glare and straylight. Doc Ophthalmol. 1991;78:177–81.
doi: 10.1007/BF00165678
Heckaman R, Fairchild M, in 17th Color and Imaging Conference Final Program and Proceedings. (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2009), 7:8–14.
Xiao F, DiCarlo J, Catrysse P, Wandell B, in 10th Color and Imaging Conference Final Program and Proceedings. (Society for Imaging Science and Technology, 2002), vol. 6, pp. 337–42.
Radonjic A, Allred SR, Gilchrist AL, Brainard DH. The dynamic range of human lightness perception. Curr Biol. 2011;21:1931–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.013
Gilchrist A, Kossyfidis C, Bonato F, Agostini T, Cataliotti J, Li X, et al. An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychol Rev. 1999;106:795–834.
doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.795
Wandell B, Foundations of Vision. Sinauer Presss, Sunderland, MA: pp.287–339
Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006;368:1795–809.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69740-7
Lindberg CR, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Vasquez V. Contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981;65:855–8.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.65.12.855
Dul M, Ennis R, Radner S, Lee B, Zaidi Q. Retinal adaptation abnormalities in primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:1329–34.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15725
Bierings R, de Boer MH, Jansonius NM. Visual performance as a function of luminance in glaucoma: the de Vries-Rose, Weber’s, and Ferry-Porter’s law. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018;59:3416–23.
doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22497