One-year follow up on post-placental IUD insertion: A randomized clinical trial.
copper intrauterine device
immediate contraception
levonorgestrel intrauterine system
post-placental
postpartum
puerperium
Journal
Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
revised:
30
12
2020
received:
05
11
2020
accepted:
03
01
2021
pubmed:
10
1
2021
medline:
29
4
2021
entrez:
9
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Our objectives were to compare the 1-year follow-up clinical performance of the TCu380A intrauterine device (TCu380A-IUD) and levonorgestrel (LNG) 52-mg intrauterine system (IUS) inserted at post-placental period. We conducted an open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial, 1:1 with pregnant women admitted for childbirth independently of the mode of birth. Our primary outcome was expulsion up to 1 year after device placement by type of IUD and mode of delivery. During the follow up (42, 90 and 365 days (±7 days) after device placement), an ultrasound was performed to evaluate the device position. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves of the TCu380A IUD and the LNG IUS. Couple-Years of Protection after insertion of both devices was calculated. One hundred and forty women were randomized to the TCu380A IUD (n = 70) or the LNG IUS (n = 70). By the end of the first year after device placement, 38 women experienced device expulsion (27.1%), most of them (33/38; 86.8%) within the first 42 days after delivery. The expulsions were significantly higher among users of TCu380A IUD (39.4%) than among users of the LNG IUS (22.2%; P = .039), and among those with vaginal delivery (43.8%) than among women with cesarean delivery (15%; P = .003). The 1-year cumulative continuation rate was 64.2%, significantly higher for LNG IUS (73.1%) than for TCu380A IUD (54.4%; P = .03), and among women with cesarean delivery (77.6%) than for vaginal delivery (52%; P = .00). The post-placental IUD insertion provided 356.4 Couple-Years of Protection. Two-thirds of women who accepted a post-placental IUD placement still used the device 1 year after childbirth. However, expulsion was the most prevalent reason for discontinuation, mainly within 42 days after device placement. The expulsion rate was significantly higher among TCu380A IUD users and among women with vaginal delivery.
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
596-603Informations de copyright
© 2021 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Allsworth JE, et al. Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:1105-1113.
Wilcox A, Levi EE, Garrett JM. Predictors of non-attendance to the postpartum follow-up visit. Matern Child Health J. 2016;20:22-27.
Jackson E, Glaiser A. Return of ovulation and menses in postpartum nonlactating women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;117:657-662.
Sok C, Sanders JN, Salzman HM, Turok DK. Sexual behavior, satisfaction, contraceptive use among postpartum women. J Midwifery Women Health. 2016;61:158-165.
Ogburn JA, Espey E, Stonehocker J. Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women. Contraception. 2005;72:426-429.
World Health Organization. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Reproductive health and research, 5th edn. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
Makins A, Taghinejadi N, Sethi M, et al. FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: complication rates across six countries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:20-27.
Averbach SH, Ermias Y, Jeng G, et al. Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):177-188.
Jatlaoui TC, Whiteman MK, Jeng G, et al. Intrauterine device expulsion after postpartum placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132:895-905.
Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Hubacher D, Stuart G, Van Vliet HAAM. Immediate postpartum insertion of intrauterine device for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(6):CD003036.
Laporte M, Marangoni M Jr, Surita F, Juliato CT, Miadaira M, Bahamondes L. Postplacental placement of intrauterine devices: a randomized clinical trial. Contraception. 2020;101:153-158.
The RESPOND Project technical meeting. New developments in the calculation and use of CYP and their implications for evaluation of family planning programs. New York: The RESPOND Project/Engender Health.
Stover J, Bertrand JT, Shelton JD. Empirically based conversion factors for calculating Couple-Years of protection. Eval Rev. 2000;24:3-46.
Madden T, McNicholas C, Zhao Q, Secura GM, Eisenberg DL, Peipert JF. Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:718-726.
Golddthwaite LM, Sheeder J, Hyer J, Tocce K, Teal SB. Postplacental intrauterine device expulsion by 12 weeks: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;21:674.e-1-674.e-8.
Hinz EK, Murthy A, Wang B, Ryan N, Ades V. A prospective cohort study comparing expulsion after postplacental insertion: the levonorgestrel versus the cooper intrauterine device. Contraception. 2019;100:101-105.
Cohen R, Sheeder J, Arango N, Teal S, Tocce K. Twelve-month contraceptive continuation and repeat pregnancy among young mothers choosing postdelivery contraceptive implants or postplacental intrauterine devices. Contraception. 2016;93:178-183.
Eggebroten JL, Sanders JN, Turok DK. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device and implant program outcomes: a prospective analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017;217:51.e1-51.e7.
Jatlaoui TC, Marcus M, Jamieson DJ, Goedken P, Cwiak C. Postplacental intrauterine device insertion at a teaching hospital. Contraception. 2014;89:528-533.
Teal SB, Sheeder J. IUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation. Contraception. 2012;85:270-274.
Washington CI, Jamshidi R, Thung SF, Nayeri UA, Caughey AB, Werner EF. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:131-137.
Kumar S, Srivastava A, Sharma S, et al. One-year continuation of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device: findings from a retrospective cohort study in India. Contraception. 2019;99:121-126.