Environmental RNAi pathways in the two-spotted spider mite.
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2021
09 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
22
11
2019
accepted:
11
12
2020
entrez:
10
1
2021
pubmed:
11
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
RNA interference (RNAi) regulates gene expression in most multicellular organisms through binding of small RNA effectors to target transcripts. Exploiting this process is a popular strategy for genetic manipulation and has applications that includes arthropod pest control. RNAi technologies are dependent on delivery method with the most convenient likely being feeding, which is effective in some animals while others are insensitive. The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, is prime candidate for developing RNAi approaches due to frequent occurrence of conventional pesticide resistance. Using a sequencing-based approach, the fate of ingested RNAs was explored to identify features and conditions that affect small RNA biogenesis from external sources to better inform RNAi design. Biochemical and sequencing approaches in conjunction with extensive computational assessment were used to evaluate metabolism of ingested RNAs in T. urticae. This chelicerae arthropod shows only modest response to oral RNAi and has biogenesis pathways distinct from model organisms. Processing of synthetic and plant host RNAs ingested during feeding were evaluated to identify active substrates for spider mite RNAi pathways. Through cataloging characteristics of biochemically purified RNA from these sources, trans-acting small RNAs could be distinguished from degradation fragments and their origins documented. Using a strategy that delineates small RNA processing, we found many transcripts have the potential to enter spider mite RNAi pathways, however, trans-acting RNAs appear very unstable and rare. This suggests potential RNAi pathway substrates from ingested materials are mostly degraded and infrequently converted into regulators of gene expression. Spider mites infest a variety of plants, and it would be maladaptive to generate diverse gene regulators from dietary RNAs. This study provides a framework for assessing RNAi technology in organisms where genetic and biochemical tools are absent and benefit rationale design of RNAi triggers for T.urticae.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
RNA interference (RNAi) regulates gene expression in most multicellular organisms through binding of small RNA effectors to target transcripts. Exploiting this process is a popular strategy for genetic manipulation and has applications that includes arthropod pest control. RNAi technologies are dependent on delivery method with the most convenient likely being feeding, which is effective in some animals while others are insensitive. The two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, is prime candidate for developing RNAi approaches due to frequent occurrence of conventional pesticide resistance. Using a sequencing-based approach, the fate of ingested RNAs was explored to identify features and conditions that affect small RNA biogenesis from external sources to better inform RNAi design.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Biochemical and sequencing approaches in conjunction with extensive computational assessment were used to evaluate metabolism of ingested RNAs in T. urticae. This chelicerae arthropod shows only modest response to oral RNAi and has biogenesis pathways distinct from model organisms. Processing of synthetic and plant host RNAs ingested during feeding were evaluated to identify active substrates for spider mite RNAi pathways. Through cataloging characteristics of biochemically purified RNA from these sources, trans-acting small RNAs could be distinguished from degradation fragments and their origins documented.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Using a strategy that delineates small RNA processing, we found many transcripts have the potential to enter spider mite RNAi pathways, however, trans-acting RNAs appear very unstable and rare. This suggests potential RNAi pathway substrates from ingested materials are mostly degraded and infrequently converted into regulators of gene expression. Spider mites infest a variety of plants, and it would be maladaptive to generate diverse gene regulators from dietary RNAs. This study provides a framework for assessing RNAi technology in organisms where genetic and biochemical tools are absent and benefit rationale design of RNAi triggers for T.urticae.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33421998
doi: 10.1186/s12864-020-07322-2
pii: 10.1186/s12864-020-07322-2
pmc: PMC7796550
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42Subventions
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : P20 GM103476
Pays : United States
Organisme : Directorate for Biological Sciences
ID : 1616725
Organisme : Mississippi IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence (US)
ID : P204M103476
Références
RNA. 2012 Feb;18(2):177-92
pubmed: 22190743
Bioinformatics. 2014 Oct;30(19):2808-10
pubmed: 24903420
Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25
pubmed: 19261174
Cell. 2004 Apr 2;117(1):69-81
pubmed: 15066283
Insect Sci. 2013 Feb;20(1):4-14
pubmed: 23955821
Pest Manag Sci. 2018 Aug;74(8):1751-1758
pubmed: 29377554
Science. 2006 Jul 21;313(5785):363-7
pubmed: 16778019
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 May 1;41(10):5503-12
pubmed: 23580554
Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Feb;81:103-116
pubmed: 28093313
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 26;6:30135
pubmed: 27456469
Mol Cell. 2016 Jul 7;63(1):125-34
pubmed: 27345150
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 22;112(38):11841-5
pubmed: 26351695
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Aug 24;107(34):15163-8
pubmed: 20699384
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 2;8(1):14687
pubmed: 30279530
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 31;106(13):5270-5
pubmed: 19251644
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008 Sep;9(9):673-8
pubmed: 18719707
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D155-D162
pubmed: 30423142
PLoS Genet. 2018 Jan 29;14(1):e1007183
pubmed: 29377900
RNA. 2018 Jul;24(7):899-907
pubmed: 29678924
Plant Physiol. 2014 Jan;164(1):384-99
pubmed: 24285850
Nature. 2011 Nov 23;479(7374):487-92
pubmed: 22113690
Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2015 Apr 1;8:111-120
pubmed: 26034705
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 27;6:36247
pubmed: 27786269
RNA Biol. 2012 Aug;9(8):1045-9
pubmed: 22858672
Cell. 2007 Mar 23;128(6):1089-103
pubmed: 17346786
RNA. 2015 May;21(5):840-50
pubmed: 25802407
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jan 1;31(1):224-8
pubmed: 12519987
PLoS Genet. 2019 Feb 19;15(2):e1007915
pubmed: 30779744
Nat Genet. 2014 Jul;46(7):707-13
pubmed: 24908249
Genome Biol. 2008;9(2):210
pubmed: 18304383
Cell. 2000 May 26;101(5):543-53
pubmed: 10850496
Life Sci Alliance. 2020 Aug 6;3(10):
pubmed: 32764103
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 8;110(2):E113-22
pubmed: 23248300
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 12;12(7):e0180654
pubmed: 28704448
Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
pubmed: 20110278
J Insect Sci. 2017 Jan 1;17(2):
pubmed: 28931155