Assessing the play and learning environments of children under two years in peri-urban Lima, Peru: a formative research study.
Early child development
Formative research
Learning environment
Mixed methods
Peri-urban
Peru
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 01 2021
09 01 2021
Historique:
received:
21
05
2020
accepted:
22
12
2020
entrez:
10
1
2021
pubmed:
11
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Home-based interventions have potential for improving early child development (ECD) in low-resource settings. The design of locally acceptable strategies requires an in-depth understanding of the household context. In this formative research study, we aimed to characterize the home play and learning environments of children 6-23 months of age from low-income households in peri-urban Lima, Peru. Drawing on the developmental niche framework, we used quantitative and qualitative methods to understand children's physical and social settings, childcare practices, and caregiver perspectives. We conducted interviews, unstructured video-recorded observations, and spot-checks with 30 randomly selected caregiver-child dyads, 10 from each child age group of 6-11, 12-17, and 18-23 months of age, as well as key informant interviews with 12 daycare instructors. We analyzed the data for key trends and themes using Stata and ATLAS.ti and employed an adapted version of the Indicator of Parent-Child Interaction to evaluate the observations. Children's social settings were characterized by multi-generational homes and the presence of siblings and cousins as play partners. Access to books and complex hand-eye coordination toys (e.g., puzzles, building blocks) in the home was limited (30.0 and 40.0%, respectively). Caregivers generally demonstrated low or inconsistent levels of interaction with their children; they rarely communicated using descriptive language or introduced novel, stimulating activities during play. Reading and telling stories to children were uncommon, yet 93.3% of caregivers reported singing to children daily. On average, caregivers ascribed a high learning value to reading books and playing with electronic toys (rated 9.7 and 9.1 out of 10, respectively), and perceived playing with everyday objects in the home as less beneficial (rated 6.8/10). Daycare instructors reinforced the problems posed by limited caregiver-child interaction and supported the use of songs for promoting ECD. The features of the home learning environments highlighted here indicate several opportunities for intervention development to improve ECD. These include encouraging caregivers to communicate with children using full sentences and enhancing the use of everyday objects as toys. There is also great potential for leveraging song and music to encourage responsive caregiver-child interactions within the home setting.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Home-based interventions have potential for improving early child development (ECD) in low-resource settings. The design of locally acceptable strategies requires an in-depth understanding of the household context. In this formative research study, we aimed to characterize the home play and learning environments of children 6-23 months of age from low-income households in peri-urban Lima, Peru.
METHODS
Drawing on the developmental niche framework, we used quantitative and qualitative methods to understand children's physical and social settings, childcare practices, and caregiver perspectives. We conducted interviews, unstructured video-recorded observations, and spot-checks with 30 randomly selected caregiver-child dyads, 10 from each child age group of 6-11, 12-17, and 18-23 months of age, as well as key informant interviews with 12 daycare instructors. We analyzed the data for key trends and themes using Stata and ATLAS.ti and employed an adapted version of the Indicator of Parent-Child Interaction to evaluate the observations.
RESULTS
Children's social settings were characterized by multi-generational homes and the presence of siblings and cousins as play partners. Access to books and complex hand-eye coordination toys (e.g., puzzles, building blocks) in the home was limited (30.0 and 40.0%, respectively). Caregivers generally demonstrated low or inconsistent levels of interaction with their children; they rarely communicated using descriptive language or introduced novel, stimulating activities during play. Reading and telling stories to children were uncommon, yet 93.3% of caregivers reported singing to children daily. On average, caregivers ascribed a high learning value to reading books and playing with electronic toys (rated 9.7 and 9.1 out of 10, respectively), and perceived playing with everyday objects in the home as less beneficial (rated 6.8/10). Daycare instructors reinforced the problems posed by limited caregiver-child interaction and supported the use of songs for promoting ECD.
CONCLUSIONS
The features of the home learning environments highlighted here indicate several opportunities for intervention development to improve ECD. These include encouraging caregivers to communicate with children using full sentences and enhancing the use of everyday objects as toys. There is also great potential for leveraging song and music to encourage responsive caregiver-child interactions within the home setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33422022
doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10119-3
pii: 10.1186/s12889-020-10119-3
pmc: PMC7796591
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI108695
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD020007
Pays : United States
Références
Dev Sci. 2012 Sep;15(5):659-73
pubmed: 22925514
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):77-90
pubmed: 27717614
Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53:371-99
pubmed: 11752490
Adv Child Dev Behav. 1994;25:241-88
pubmed: 7847171
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003 Aug;45(8):536-41
pubmed: 12882532
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1071-83
pubmed: 26048887
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jun;33(5):727-735
pubmed: 30407068
Lancet. 2007 Jan 13;369(9556):145-57
pubmed: 17223478
Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2049-59
pubmed: 26477328
Pediatrics. 2019 Jan;143(1):
pubmed: 30509931
Child Dev. 2012 Jan-Feb;83(1):76-91
pubmed: 22277008
J Music Ther. 2009 Spring;46(1):32-52
pubmed: 19256731
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:433-57
pubmed: 25196276
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan;244:112324
pubmed: 31189492
Psychol Sci. 2013 Nov 1;24(11):2143-52
pubmed: 24022649
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Feb 4;5(2):e002314
pubmed: 32133201
Infant Ment Health J. 2012 Sep 1;33(5):439-458
pubmed: 24644374
J Hum Resour. 2015 Spring;50(2):446-463
pubmed: 25983344
Child Dev. 2001 May-Jun;72(3):748-67
pubmed: 11405580
Dev Psychobiol. 1990 Nov;23(7):727-40
pubmed: 2286300
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Jun;18(6):276-8
pubmed: 24684854
Child Dev. 2015 Sep-Oct;86(5):1351-70
pubmed: 26283023
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Jul;159(7):619-25
pubmed: 15996993
J Nutr. 2004 Jun;134(6):1417-23
pubmed: 15173406
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 17;9:1152
pubmed: 30065679
Lancet. 2007 Jan 20;369(9557):229-42
pubmed: 17240290
Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;27(Pt 1):27-45
pubmed: 19972661
Lancet. 2011 Oct 8;378(9799):1339-53
pubmed: 21944378
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;159:73-82
pubmed: 27173743
Lancet. 2007 Jan 6;369(9555):60-70
pubmed: 17208643
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Nov;58(11):1264-1275
pubmed: 28543426
J Marriage Fam. 2012 Oct 1;74(5):913-930
pubmed: 24653527
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Dec;61(4):343-65
pubmed: 20832781
Lancet Glob Health. 2016 Jun;4(6):e414-26
pubmed: 27198845
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Jan;38(2):217-26
pubmed: 8140448
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109 Suppl 2:17273-80
pubmed: 23045688
Am Psychol. 2001 Jan;56(1):5-15
pubmed: 11242988
Child Dev. 2012 Sep-Oct;83(5):1762-74
pubmed: 22716950
Child Dev. 2017 Sep;88(5):1513-1526
pubmed: 28650107
Pediatrics. 2016 Apr;137(4):
pubmed: 26977079
J Pediatr. 2007 Oct;151(4):364-8
pubmed: 17889070
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Jun;163(6):554-8
pubmed: 19487612
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Feb;170(2):132-7
pubmed: 26720437
J Health Psychol. 2008 Mar;13(2):226-38
pubmed: 18375628
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
J Nutr. 2013 Jun;143(6):885-93
pubmed: 23616511
Front Psychol. 2015 Oct 15;6:1559
pubmed: 26528217
Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1806-20
pubmed: 15566381
Lancet. 2017 Jan 7;389(10064):91-102
pubmed: 27717615