Adapting MRI as a clinical outcome measure for a facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy trial of prednisone and tacrolimus: case report.
All neuromuscular disease
Case report
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD)
Muscle disease
Outcome measures
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 Jan 2021
09 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
22
07
2020
accepted:
23
12
2020
entrez:
10
1
2021
pubmed:
11
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a patchy and slowly progressive disease of skeletal muscle. MRI short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences of patient muscles often show increased hyperintensity that is hypothesized to be associated with inflammation. This is supported by the presence of inflammatory changes on biopsies of STIR-positive muscles. We hypothesized that the STIR positivity would normalize with targeted immunosuppressive therapy. 45-year-old male with FSHD type 1 was treated with 12 weeks of immunosuppressive therapy, tacrolimus and prednisone. Tacrolimus was treated to a goal serum trough of > 5 ng/mL and prednisone was tapered every month. Quantitative strength exam, functional outcome measures, and muscle MRI were performed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. The patient reported subjective worsening as reflected in quantitative strength exam. The MRI STIR signal was slightly increased from 0.02 to 0.03 of total muscle; while the T1 fat fraction was stable. Functional outcome measures also were stable. Immunosuppressive therapy in refractive autoimmune myopathy in other contexts has been shown to reverse STIR signal hyperintensity, however this treatment did not reverse STIR signal in this patient with FSHD. In fact, STIR signal slightly increased throughout the treatment period. This is the first study of using MRI STIR and T1 fat fraction to follow treatment effect in FSHD. We find that STIR might not be a dynamic marker for suppressing inflammation in FSHD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a patchy and slowly progressive disease of skeletal muscle. MRI short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences of patient muscles often show increased hyperintensity that is hypothesized to be associated with inflammation. This is supported by the presence of inflammatory changes on biopsies of STIR-positive muscles. We hypothesized that the STIR positivity would normalize with targeted immunosuppressive therapy.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
45-year-old male with FSHD type 1 was treated with 12 weeks of immunosuppressive therapy, tacrolimus and prednisone. Tacrolimus was treated to a goal serum trough of > 5 ng/mL and prednisone was tapered every month. Quantitative strength exam, functional outcome measures, and muscle MRI were performed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. The patient reported subjective worsening as reflected in quantitative strength exam. The MRI STIR signal was slightly increased from 0.02 to 0.03 of total muscle; while the T1 fat fraction was stable. Functional outcome measures also were stable.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Immunosuppressive therapy in refractive autoimmune myopathy in other contexts has been shown to reverse STIR signal hyperintensity, however this treatment did not reverse STIR signal in this patient with FSHD. In fact, STIR signal slightly increased throughout the treatment period. This is the first study of using MRI STIR and T1 fat fraction to follow treatment effect in FSHD. We find that STIR might not be a dynamic marker for suppressing inflammation in FSHD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33422031
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03910-1
pii: 10.1186/s12891-020-03910-1
pmc: PMC7797109
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prednisone
VB0R961HZT
Tacrolimus
WM0HAQ4WNM
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
56Références
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jun;57(6):905-912
pubmed: 29236297
J Clin Immunol. 2011 Apr;31(2):155-66
pubmed: 21063901
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1323-41
pubmed: 22770690
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2016 Jul;16(7):66
pubmed: 27215221
Radiographics. 2000 Oct;20 Spec No:S295-315
pubmed: 11046180
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 14;9(1):e85416
pubmed: 24454861
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Feb 1;28(3):476-486
pubmed: 30312408
Brain. 1975 Dec;98(4):637-66
pubmed: 1218371
J Neurol. 2019 May;266(5):1127-1135
pubmed: 30778707
Neurology. 2020 Sep 1;95(9):e1211-e1221
pubmed: 32611642
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183825
pubmed: 28841698
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Oct;52(4):521-6
pubmed: 25704033
Neurology. 1997 Jan;48(1):46-9
pubmed: 9008492
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Mar;55(3):441-9
pubmed: 26412808
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Sep;45(9):1171-3
pubmed: 16801330
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2012 Apr;4(2):111-20
pubmed: 22870499
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Jun;192(6):1708-16
pubmed: 19457839
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e38779
pubmed: 22719944
J Neurol. 2017 Mar;264(3):438-447
pubmed: 28000006