Immunogenicity and safety of fractional doses of yellow fever vaccines: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 01 2021
09 01 2021
Historique:
received:
25
08
2020
revised:
28
10
2020
accepted:
04
11
2020
entrez:
10
1
2021
pubmed:
11
1
2021
medline:
6
7
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Stocks of yellow fever vaccine are insufficient to cover exceptional demands for outbreak response. Fractional dosing has shown efficacy, but evidence is limited to the 17DD substrain vaccine. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of one-fifth fractional dose compared with standard dose of four WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines produced from three substrains. We did this randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at research centres in Mbarara, Uganda, and Kilifi, Kenya. Eligible participants were aged 18-59 years, had no contraindications for vaccination, were not pregnant or lactating, had no history of yellow fever vaccination or infection, and did not require yellow fever vaccination for travel. Eligible participants were recruited from communities and randomly assigned to one of eight groups, corresponding to the four vaccines at standard or fractional dose. The vaccine was administered subcutaneously by nurses who were not masked to treatment, but participants and other study personnel were masked to vaccine allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of participants with seroconversion 28 days after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as post-vaccination neutralising antibody titres at least 4 times pre-vaccination measurement measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT Between Nov 6, 2017, and Feb 21, 2018, 1029 participants were assessed for inclusion. 69 people were ineligible, and 960 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to vaccine manufacturer and dose (120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz standard dose, 120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz fractional dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides standard dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides fractional dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar standard dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar fractional dose, 120 to Sanofi Pasteur standard dose, and 120 to Sanofi Pasteur fractional dose). 49 participants had detectable PRNT Fractional doses of all WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines were non-inferior to the standard dose in inducing seroconversion 28 days after vaccination, with no major safety concerns. These results support the use of fractional dosage in the general adult population for outbreak response in situations of vaccine shortage. The study was funded by Médecins Sans Frontières Foundation, Wellcome Trust (grant no. 092654), and the UK Department for International Development. Vaccines were donated in kind.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Stocks of yellow fever vaccine are insufficient to cover exceptional demands for outbreak response. Fractional dosing has shown efficacy, but evidence is limited to the 17DD substrain vaccine. We assessed the immunogenicity and safety of one-fifth fractional dose compared with standard dose of four WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines produced from three substrains.
METHODS
We did this randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at research centres in Mbarara, Uganda, and Kilifi, Kenya. Eligible participants were aged 18-59 years, had no contraindications for vaccination, were not pregnant or lactating, had no history of yellow fever vaccination or infection, and did not require yellow fever vaccination for travel. Eligible participants were recruited from communities and randomly assigned to one of eight groups, corresponding to the four vaccines at standard or fractional dose. The vaccine was administered subcutaneously by nurses who were not masked to treatment, but participants and other study personnel were masked to vaccine allocation. The primary outcome was proportion of participants with seroconversion 28 days after vaccination. Seroconversion was defined as post-vaccination neutralising antibody titres at least 4 times pre-vaccination measurement measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation test (PRNT
FINDINGS
Between Nov 6, 2017, and Feb 21, 2018, 1029 participants were assessed for inclusion. 69 people were ineligible, and 960 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to vaccine manufacturer and dose (120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz standard dose, 120 to Bio-Manguinhos-Fiocruz fractional dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides standard dose, 120 to Chumakov Institute of Poliomyelitis and Viral Encephalitides fractional dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar standard dose, 120 to Institut Pasteur Dakar fractional dose, 120 to Sanofi Pasteur standard dose, and 120 to Sanofi Pasteur fractional dose). 49 participants had detectable PRNT
INTERPRETATION
Fractional doses of all WHO-prequalified yellow fever vaccines were non-inferior to the standard dose in inducing seroconversion 28 days after vaccination, with no major safety concerns. These results support the use of fractional dosage in the general adult population for outbreak response in situations of vaccine shortage.
FUNDING
The study was funded by Médecins Sans Frontières Foundation, Wellcome Trust (grant no. 092654), and the UK Department for International Development. Vaccines were donated in kind.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33422245
pii: S0140-6736(20)32520-4
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32520-4
pmc: PMC7794660
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Neutralizing
0
Yellow Fever Vaccine
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02991495']
Types de publication
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119-127Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 092654
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. ;92(16):193-204
pubmed: 28429585
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2904-2911
pubmed: 27837923
Lancet Infect Dis. 2001 Aug;1(1):11-20
pubmed: 11871403
Viral Immunol. 2008 Jun;21(2):123-32
pubmed: 18476771
Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013 Jul 5;88(27):269-83
pubmed: 23909008
BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 3;18(1):548
pubmed: 30390621
Lancet. 2016 Apr 16;387(10028):1599-600
pubmed: 27116054
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2013 Apr;9(4):879-88
pubmed: 23364472
Bull World Health Organ. 1969;40(1):113-21
pubmed: 4183812
Vaccine. 2011 Aug 11;29(35):6008-16
pubmed: 21718741
Vaccine. 2017 Oct 13;35(43):5751-5752
pubmed: 28689653
Vaccine. 2010 Dec 6;28(52):8236-45
pubmed: 21055492
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Dec 4;169(11):761-765
pubmed: 30476963
Vaccine. 2018 Jun 27;36(28):4112-4117
pubmed: 29784469
J Biol Stand. 1988 Apr;16(2):77-82
pubmed: 3372545
Vaccine. 2005 Nov 1;23(45):5205-11
pubmed: 16055233
J Clin Invest. 2014 Jul;124(7):3147-58
pubmed: 24911151
N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381(5):444-454
pubmed: 29443626
Wellcome Open Res. 2019 Nov 20;4:182
pubmed: 31984244
PLoS One. 2008 Apr 23;3(4):e1993
pubmed: 18431480
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 16;379(7):603-605
pubmed: 29995585
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;14:391
pubmed: 25022840