Cohesive Round Implants and the Risk of Implant Flipping.


Journal

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open
ISSN: 2169-7574
Titre abrégé: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101622231

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
received: 20 04 2020
accepted: 14 10 2020
entrez: 11 1 2021
pubmed: 12 1 2021
medline: 12 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fifth-generation, round, form-stable implants have a higher cohesive gel, a higher fill volume, and distinct anterior and posterior profiles. Due to these implant features, anterior-posterior (AP) flipping of round, form-stable implants is discernible, but little is known of this complication of implant reconstruction. Patients who underwent skin- or nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by direct-to-implant reconstruction with round, cohesive, smooth implants were included in this retrospective study. Implants were placed submuscularly or prepectorally. Incidence of flipping was retrieved from patient records. Patients were stratified by presence or absence of flipping; data on patient demographic characteristics, neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment, mastectomy characteristics, and acellular dermal matrix (ADM) type (AlloDerm or FlexHD) and coverage technique (inferior pole, tenting, or wrapping) were compared between the groups to identify risk factors associated with flipping. A total of 117 patients (230 breasts) were evaluated. Sixteen cases of implant flipping were documented for a flip rate of 7.0%, all occurring in patients with prepectoral implants. On univariate analysis, prepectoral implant placement, highly cohesive implants, use of AlloDerm, and ADM wrapping/tenting were found to be significantly associated with AP flipping. On logistic regression analyses, ADM type and ADM coverage technique were no longer significant predictors of AP flipping. Patients who undergo prepectoral implant reconstruction with highly cohesive round implants appear to be at an increased risk of AP flipping. Subpectoral reconstruction is not associated with AP flipping.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33425624
doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003321
pmc: PMC7787287
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e3321

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

Références

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jun;139(6):1367-1378
pubmed: 28538561
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul;144(1S Utilizing a Spectrum of Cohesive Implants in Aesthetic and Re):7S-12S
pubmed: 31246755
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;35(1):125-8
pubmed: 20665020
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Dec;140(6S Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction):39S-42S
pubmed: 29166346
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 Jan;46(1):34-38
pubmed: 30685939

Auteurs

Justin Jong (J)

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tenn.

Allen Gabriel (A)

Department of Plastic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, Calif.

Melissa Trekell (M)

East Tennessee Breast Center, Blount Memorial Hospital, Maryville, Tenn.

Amy S Lawser (AS)

Amelia Consulting, Amelia Island, Fla.

Eric Heidel (E)

Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tenn.

Dallas Buchanan (D)

Vivify Plastic surgery, Tampa Bay, Fla.

Joseph T Chun (JT)

Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center-Knoxville, Knoxville, Tenn.

Classifications MeSH