Concern About Contracting COVID-19 Predicts Men's Preference for Female Facial Femininity, But Not Women's Preference for Male Facial Masculinity.
COVID-19 pandemic
Femininity and masculinity
Pathogen threat
Sexual dimorphism
Journal
Adaptive human behavior and physiology
ISSN: 2198-7335
Titre abrégé: Adapt Human Behav Physiol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101643929
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
11
10
2020
revised:
28
11
2020
accepted:
30
11
2020
pubmed:
12
1
2021
medline:
12
1
2021
entrez:
11
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Humans have evolved a behavioral system that responds to perceptual cues suggesting the existence of a pathogenic threat in other individuals and the environment. While previous investigations have reported that individuals' sexual preferences are influenced by a pathogen threat, the empirical support for face preference is mixed (i.e., the association of pathogenic threat and individuals' preferences for masculine and/or feminine faces is equivocal). The COVID-19 pandemic provides the opportunity to investigate the association of pathogenic threat and men's and women's preferences for sexual dimorphism of faces in the opposite sex in a real-world pathogenic situation. Data were collected during COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) from men and women in the United States, and women in Iran, on preferences for masculinity in men's faces using women participants, and femininity in women's faces using men. Results showed that concern about an actual pathogenic threat (i.e., contracting COVID-19) predicts men's preference for female facial femininity, but not women's preference for male facial masculinity (for both U.S. and Iranian women). By using an actual pathogenic threat, our results support previous findings that men's preferences for female faces are shifted to less feminine faces under pathogenic threat. Moreover, our results provide support for the distinction between the behavioral immune system and pathogen disgust, at least for men's preference for feminine female faces. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40750-020-00158-w.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33425662
doi: 10.1007/s40750-020-00158-w
pii: 158
pmc: PMC7785912
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
17-27Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of InterestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):103-22
pubmed: 19586243
Trends Cogn Sci. 1999 Dec;3(12):452-460
pubmed: 10562724
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Aug 7;277(1692):2405-10
pubmed: 20236978
J Sex Res. 2012;49(2-3):227-43
pubmed: 22380590
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 8;12(6):e0178206
pubmed: 28594843
Biol Lett. 2014 Apr 30;10(4):20130850
pubmed: 24789138
Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307
pubmed: 30894741
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 12;366(1583):3375-88
pubmed: 22042915
Biol Psychol. 2013 Feb;92(2):233-40
pubmed: 23182875
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 12;366(1583):3418-26
pubmed: 22042918
Biol Lett. 2013 Mar 27;9(3):20130050
pubmed: 23536442
Hum Nat. 1993 Sep;4(3):237-69
pubmed: 24214366
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):400-7
pubmed: 25761395
Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384-7
pubmed: 7123238
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Aug 7;270 Suppl 1:S93-5
pubmed: 12952647
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 4;9(1):3387
pubmed: 30833635
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 27;5(10):e13585
pubmed: 21048972