Blood-based kinase activity profiling: a potential predictor of response to immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic cancer.


Journal

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2020
Historique:
accepted: 15 11 2020
pubmed: 12 1 2021
medline: 21 9 2021
entrez: 11 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Many cancer patients do not obtain clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Checkpoint blockade targets T cells, suggesting that tyrosine kinase activity profiling of baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cells may predict clinical outcome. Here a total of 160 patients with advanced melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1), were divided into five discovery and cross-validation cohorts. The kinase activity profile was generated by analyzing phosphorylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysates in a microarray comprising of 144 peptides derived from sites that are substrates for protein tyrosine kinases. Binary grouping into patients with or without clinical benefit was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Predictive models were trained using partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), performance of the models was evaluated by estimating the correct classification rate (CCR) using cross-validation. The kinase phosphorylation signatures segregated responders from non-responders by differences in canonical pathways governing T-cell migration, infiltration and co-stimulation. PLS-DA resulted in a CCR of 100% and 93% in the anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 melanoma discovery cohorts, respectively. Cross-validation cohorts to estimate the accuracy of the predictive models showed CCRs of 83% for anti-CTLA-4 and 78% or 68% for anti-PD-1 in melanoma or NSCLC, respectively. Blood-based kinase activity profiling for response prediction to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma and NSCLC revealed increased kinase activity in pathways associated with T-cell function and led to a classification model with a highly accurate classification rate in cross-validation groups. The predictive value of kinase activity profiling is prospectively verified in an ongoing trial.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Many cancer patients do not obtain clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Checkpoint blockade targets T cells, suggesting that tyrosine kinase activity profiling of baseline peripheral blood mononuclear cells may predict clinical outcome.
METHODS
Here a total of 160 patients with advanced melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA-4) or anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1), were divided into five discovery and cross-validation cohorts. The kinase activity profile was generated by analyzing phosphorylation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell lysates in a microarray comprising of 144 peptides derived from sites that are substrates for protein tyrosine kinases. Binary grouping into patients with or without clinical benefit was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Predictive models were trained using partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), performance of the models was evaluated by estimating the correct classification rate (CCR) using cross-validation.
RESULTS
The kinase phosphorylation signatures segregated responders from non-responders by differences in canonical pathways governing T-cell migration, infiltration and co-stimulation. PLS-DA resulted in a CCR of 100% and 93% in the anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD1 melanoma discovery cohorts, respectively. Cross-validation cohorts to estimate the accuracy of the predictive models showed CCRs of 83% for anti-CTLA-4 and 78% or 68% for anti-PD-1 in melanoma or NSCLC, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Blood-based kinase activity profiling for response prediction to immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma and NSCLC revealed increased kinase activity in pathways associated with T-cell function and led to a classification model with a highly accurate classification rate in cross-validation groups. The predictive value of kinase activity profiling is prospectively verified in an ongoing trial.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33427690
pii: jitc-2020-001607
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001607
pmc: PMC7757459
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: EMEV and SHvdB hold a patent on the assay to predict clinical response to checkpoint blockade therapy. RdW, LH, DMAvdH, RR, HMP and JPG are employees of PamGene International BV and MPL have research funds from Roche and Novartis for projects outside the submitted work. RD has intermittent, project focused consulting and/or advisory relationships with Novartis, MSD, BMS, Roche, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre, Sun Pharma, Sanofi, Catalym, Second Genome, Regeneron and Alligator outside the submitted work. RHJM reports grants from Astellas, Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim, Cristal Therapeutics, Pamgene, Novartis, Servier, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi, outside the submitted work, and has a patent biomarker for immunotherapy pending. JGJVA reports personal fees from MSD, BMS, Amphera, Eli-Lilly, Takeda, Bayer, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work, and has a patent allogenic tumor cell lysate licensed to Amphera, a patent combination immunotherapy in cancer and a patent biomarker for immunotherapy pending. HMP has an advisory relationship with Qurin Diagnostics, VitrOmics HealthCare Holding and Experimental Biotherapeutics. The authors declare that there are no other conflicts of interest.

Références

Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 19;8(1):592
pubmed: 28928380
Science. 2015 Apr 3;348(6230):124-8
pubmed: 25765070
Biol Reprod. 1996 Jul;55(1):207-16
pubmed: 8793077
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 2;8(40):68599-68613
pubmed: 28978141
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):563-7
pubmed: 25428504
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Jun 8;7(1):149
pubmed: 31176366
J Immunol. 2006 Oct 1;177(7):4262-6
pubmed: 16982858
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):2908-18
pubmed: 26787752
Cancer Discov. 2016 Feb;6(2):202-16
pubmed: 26645196
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Sep 15;19(18):4917-24
pubmed: 23868869
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Mar;13(3):377-386
pubmed: 29233789
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 May 9;114(19):4993-4998
pubmed: 28446615
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Mar;73:61-70
pubmed: 28167454
Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 May;16(5):275-87
pubmed: 27079802
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Sep;5(18):376
pubmed: 29057236
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5487-5496
pubmed: 27185375
Cell Res. 2015 Feb;25(2):208-24
pubmed: 25582080
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2015 Jul;95(1):114-24
pubmed: 25624177
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 30;8(8):e72692
pubmed: 24023633
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30
pubmed: 25399552
Nat Med. 2018 Feb;24(2):144-153
pubmed: 29309059
Biomark Res. 2017 Mar 15;5:12
pubmed: 28331612
Nature. 2014 Nov 27;515(7528):568-71
pubmed: 25428505
Front Immunol. 2019 Jul 19;10:1719
pubmed: 31379886
Science. 2017 Mar 31;355(6332):1428-1433
pubmed: 28280247
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 22;373(17):1627-39
pubmed: 26412456
Cancers (Basel). 2019 May 31;11(6):
pubmed: 31159331
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 31;378(22):2093-2104
pubmed: 29658845
Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):732-8
pubmed: 26802161
Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 28;9:1474
pubmed: 30002656
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Oct 1;78(2):555-62
pubmed: 20675069
Cell Syst. 2018 Sep 26;7(3):347-350.e1
pubmed: 30172842
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Nov;67(6):472-492
pubmed: 29028110
Immunity. 2017 Feb 21;46(2):197-204
pubmed: 28228279
Cancer. 2020 Jan 15;126(2):260-270
pubmed: 31691957
Cell Death Differ. 2016 Jun;23(6):1004-15
pubmed: 27082453
Cancer Immunol Res. 2019 Sep;7(9):1472-1484
pubmed: 31266785
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 9;373(2):123-35
pubmed: 26028407
Science. 2011 Apr 29;332(6029):600-3
pubmed: 21474713
Lung Cancer. 2017 Apr;106:1-7
pubmed: 28285682
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2018 May;67(5):713-727
pubmed: 29423649
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2020 May;69(5):771-777
pubmed: 32047958

Auteurs

Daan P Hurkmans (DP)

Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands d.hurkmans@erasmusmc.nl shvdburg@lumc.nl.
Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Els M E Verdegaal (EME)

Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Sabrina A Hogan (SA)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Rik de Wijn (R)

PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Lies Hovestad (L)

PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Dianne M A van den Heuvel (DMA)

PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Rob Ruijtenbeek (R)

PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Marij J P Welters (MJP)

Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Mandy van Brakel (M)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Edwin A Basak (EA)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Herbert M Pinedo (HM)

PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Cor H J Lamers (CHJ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Harmen J G van de Werken (HJG)

Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cancer Computational Biology Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

John P Groten (JP)

PamGene International B.V, HH 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

Reno Debets (R)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Mitchell P Levesque (MP)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Reinhard Dummer (R)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Ellen Kapiteijn (E)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Ron H J Mathijssen (RHJ)

Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Joachim G J V Aerts (JGJV)

Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Sjoerd H van der Burg (SH)

Department of Medical Oncology, Oncode Institute, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands d.hurkmans@erasmusmc.nl shvdburg@lumc.nl.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH