Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after discontinuation for grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events in patients with cancer.
autoimmunity
immunotherapy
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2020
12 2020
Historique:
accepted:
27
11
2020
entrez:
11
1
2021
pubmed:
12
1
2021
medline:
21
9
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Safety of rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) leading to ICI discontinuation remains unclear. All adverse drug reactions involving at least one ICI reported up to December 31, 2019 were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database. Patients were included if they experienced at least one grade ≥2 irAE resulting in ICI discontinuation, with subsequent ICI rechallenge. The primary outcome was the recurrence of at least one grade ≥2 irAE in these patients after ICI rechallenge. We included 180 patients: 61.1% were men (median age of 66 years), 43.9% had melanoma and 78.9% were receiving anti-programmed cell death 1. First ICI discontinuation was related to 191 irAEs. After ICI rechallenge, 38.9% of the patients experienced at least one grade ≥2 irAE. Among them, 70.0% experienced the same irAE, 25.7% a distinct irAE, and 4.3% both the same and a distinct irAE. Lower recurrence rates of irAEs were associated with rechallenge with the same ICI treatment (p=0.02) or first endocrine irAEs (p=0.003). Gastrointestinal irAEs were more likely to recur (p=0.007). The median duration from ICI discontinuation to rechallenge and the severity of the initial irAE did not predict recurrent irAEs after ICI rechallenge (p=0.53 and p=0.40, respectively). In this study, 61.1% of the patients who discontinued ICI treatment for grade ≥2 irAEs experienced no recurrent grade ≥2 irAEs after ICI rechallenge. Although ICI rechallenge appears to be safe under close monitoring, it should always be discussed balancing usefulness of rechallenge, patient comorbidities and risk of recurrence of first irAE(s). Due to inherent bias associated with pharmacovigilance studies, further prospective studies are needed to assess risk factors that may influence patient outcomes after ICI rechallenge.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Safety of rechallenge of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after grade ≥2 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) leading to ICI discontinuation remains unclear.
METHODS
All adverse drug reactions involving at least one ICI reported up to December 31, 2019 were extracted from the French pharmacovigilance database. Patients were included if they experienced at least one grade ≥2 irAE resulting in ICI discontinuation, with subsequent ICI rechallenge. The primary outcome was the recurrence of at least one grade ≥2 irAE in these patients after ICI rechallenge.
RESULTS
We included 180 patients: 61.1% were men (median age of 66 years), 43.9% had melanoma and 78.9% were receiving anti-programmed cell death 1. First ICI discontinuation was related to 191 irAEs. After ICI rechallenge, 38.9% of the patients experienced at least one grade ≥2 irAE. Among them, 70.0% experienced the same irAE, 25.7% a distinct irAE, and 4.3% both the same and a distinct irAE. Lower recurrence rates of irAEs were associated with rechallenge with the same ICI treatment (p=0.02) or first endocrine irAEs (p=0.003). Gastrointestinal irAEs were more likely to recur (p=0.007). The median duration from ICI discontinuation to rechallenge and the severity of the initial irAE did not predict recurrent irAEs after ICI rechallenge (p=0.53 and p=0.40, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, 61.1% of the patients who discontinued ICI treatment for grade ≥2 irAEs experienced no recurrent grade ≥2 irAEs after ICI rechallenge. Although ICI rechallenge appears to be safe under close monitoring, it should always be discussed balancing usefulness of rechallenge, patient comorbidities and risk of recurrence of first irAE(s). Due to inherent bias associated with pharmacovigilance studies, further prospective studies are needed to assess risk factors that may influence patient outcomes after ICI rechallenge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33428586
pii: jitc-2020-001622
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-001622
pmc: PMC7768965
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3924-3933
pubmed: 29023213
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jan;120(1):3-5
pubmed: 30413824
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Mar;18(3):312-322
pubmed: 28131785
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1714-1768
pubmed: 29442540
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 6;:
pubmed: 31169866
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 20;37(30):2738-2745
pubmed: 31163011
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jun 1;6(6):865-871
pubmed: 32297899
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv264-iv266
pubmed: 29917046
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 20;37(36):3563-3564
pubmed: 31596635
Drug Saf. 2009;32(1):19-31
pubmed: 19132802
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 11;378(2):158-168
pubmed: 29320654
Ann Oncol. 2016 Apr;27(4):559-74
pubmed: 26715621
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1182-1191
pubmed: 28734759
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 27;382(9):810-821
pubmed: 32101663
Cancer Immunol Res. 2018 Sep;6(9):1093-1099
pubmed: 29991499
Ann Oncol. 2020 Feb;31(2):310-317
pubmed: 31959349
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Feb;54:139-148
pubmed: 26765102
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4156-4167
pubmed: 32673417
Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):385-96
pubmed: 16689555
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2496-2502
pubmed: 28961828
Therapie. 1985 Mar-Apr;40(2):111-8
pubmed: 4002188
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Oct 20;37(30):2714-2718
pubmed: 31461381
Drug Saf. 1999 Feb;20(2):109-17
pubmed: 10082069
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 17;381(16):1535-1546
pubmed: 31562797
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Feb;8(1):
pubmed: 32066646
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):250-255
pubmed: 29045547