Does time management work? A meta-analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
27
10
2020
accepted:
21
12
2020
entrez:
11
1
2021
pubmed:
12
1
2021
medline:
11
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Does time management work? We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the impact of time management on performance and well-being. Results show that time management is moderately related to job performance, academic achievement, and wellbeing. Time management also shows a moderate, negative relationship with distress. Interestingly, individual differences and contextual factors have a much weaker association with time management, with the notable exception of conscientiousness. The extremely weak correlation with gender was unexpected: women seem to manage time better than men, but the difference is very slight. Further, we found that the link between time management and job performance seems to increase over the years: time management is more likely to get people a positive performance review at work today than in the early 1990s. The link between time management and gender, too, seems to intensify: women's time management scores have been on the rise for the past few decades. We also note that time management seems to enhance wellbeing-in particular, life satisfaction-to a greater extent than it does performance. This challenges the common perception that time management first and foremost enhances work performance, and that wellbeing is simply a byproduct.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33428644
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245066
pii: PONE-D-20-33672
pmc: PMC7799745
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0245066Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist
Références
Br J Health Psychol. 2003 Feb;8(Pt 1):107-22
pubmed: 12643820
Br J Sociol. 2019 Jun;70(3):997-1024
pubmed: 29638001
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:479-502
pubmed: 9496630
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 May;45(5):688-699
pubmed: 30226411
R Soc Open Sci. 2019 Aug 21;6(8):190944
pubmed: 31598259
J Educ Psychol. 2012 May 1;104(2):439-451
pubmed: 24072936
J Psychol. 1996 May;130(3):229-36
pubmed: 8667284
J Abnorm Psychol. 1968 Oct;73(5):431-9
pubmed: 5722381
J Appl Psychol. 2018 Mar;103(3):300-312
pubmed: 29154579
Soc Forces. 1979 Sep;58(1):38-58
pubmed: 10243688
Child Dev. 2019 Mar;90(2):638-654
pubmed: 28925063
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):537-553
pubmed: 28801932
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 15;106(37):15583-7
pubmed: 19706386
J Psychol. 1994 Jul;128(4):393-6
pubmed: 7932291
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Sep 10;7:40
pubmed: 17845719
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Oct;4(10):993-1003
pubmed: 32747805
J Health Soc Behav. 2004 Jun;45(2):115-31
pubmed: 15305755
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 15;10(1):1759
pubmed: 30988286
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):665-76
pubmed: 21244125
J Psychol. 2010 Sep-Oct;144(5):429-47
pubmed: 20806849
J Occup Health Psychol. 1999 Jan;4(1):72-7
pubmed: 10100115