Formaldehyde Emissions from Wooden Toys: Comparison of Different Measurement Methods and Assessment of Exposure.

EN 717-3 emission test chamber flask method formaldehyde microchamber wooden toys

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 19 11 2020
revised: 22 12 2020
accepted: 31 12 2020
entrez: 12 1 2021
pubmed: 13 1 2021
medline: 13 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Formaldehyde is considered as carcinogenic and is emitted from particleboards and plywood used in toy manufacturing. Currently, the flask method is frequently used in Europe for market surveillance purposes to assess formaldehyde release from toys, but its concordance to levels measured in emission test chambers is poor. Surveillance laboratories are unable to afford laborious and expensive emission chamber testing to comply with a new amendment of the European Toy Directive; they need an alternative method that can provide reliable results. Therefore, the application of miniaturised emission test chambers was tested. Comparisons between a 1 m

Identifiants

pubmed: 33430314
pii: ma14020262
doi: 10.3390/ma14020262
pmc: PMC7825799
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung
ID : 1322-559
Organisme : Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung
ID : 1322-631

Références

Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Mar;387(5):1907-19
pubmed: 17225110
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2011 Jun;61(6):689-95
pubmed: 21751584
Data Brief. 2018 Nov 24;22:400-435
pubmed: 30596137
Front Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;7:202
pubmed: 31475125
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Nov;24(31):24156-24166
pubmed: 28884255
Chem Rev. 2010 Apr 14;110(4):2536-72
pubmed: 20067232
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Apr 19;13(4):431
pubmed: 27104547
J Hazard Mater. 2008 Apr 1;152(2):669-76
pubmed: 17854990
Indoor Air. 2020 Jan;30(1):40-48
pubmed: 31544292
Indoor Air. 1999 Dec;9(4):268-72
pubmed: 10649860

Auteurs

Morgane Even (M)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Division 4.2-Materials and Air Pollutants, Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Königin-Luise-Strasse 2-4, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Olaf Wilke (O)

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Division 4.2-Materials and Air Pollutants, Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany.

Sabine Kalus (S)

Bundesanstalt für Materialforschung und -prüfung (BAM), Division 4.2-Materials and Air Pollutants, Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany.

Petra Schultes (P)

Chemical and Veterinary Analytical Institute Münsterland-Emscher-Lippe (CVUA-MEL), Joseph-König-Str. 40, 48147 Münster, Germany.

Christoph Hutzler (C)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.

Andreas Luch (A)

German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Department of Chemical and Product Safety, Max-Dohrn-Strasse 8-10, 10589 Berlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Biology, Chemistry, Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, Königin-Luise-Strasse 2-4, 14195 Berlin, Germany.

Classifications MeSH