Light transmission and bond strength of glass fiber posts submitted to different surface treatments.
Journal
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry
ISSN: 1097-6841
Titre abrégé: J Prosthet Dent
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376364
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
received:
17
09
2019
revised:
13
11
2020
accepted:
13
11
2020
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
10
4
2021
entrez:
12
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Light transmitted deep into the root canal is an important parameter to increase bonding of the cement to the post and dentin. Glass fiber posts seem to be an option to increase transmitted light, but literature on the light transmittance profile and power transmission to deep canal regions is lacking. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate light delivered by 2 types of fiberglass posts submitted to different surface treatments and to evaluate the bond strength. Whiteposts and Superposts were allocated to 4 groups: no surface treatment, surface treatment with 24% hydrogen peroxide, surface treatment with silane, and surface treatment with 24% hydrogen peroxide plus silane. The total light transmitted by the posts was measured by using an integrating sphere to collect the diffuse light. The light profile that was laterally delivered to the post was measured with a power detector equipped with an optical fiber probe. The bond strength was measured with the push-out test. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the surface treatments. The light transmission data were analyzed by using a generalized linear model and the Bonferroni test and the bond strength values were evaluated by using ANOVA and the Tukey test (α=.05). The cervical third presented the highest transmission (74.1% for Whiteposts and 74.6% for Superposts), followed by the middle (20.9% for Whiteposts and 20.4% for Superposts) and apical (5.0% for both Whiteposts and Superposts) thirds. Superposts led to higher bond strength than Whiteposts (9.73 ±5.89 and 8.48 ±4.99 MPa, respectively). Surface treatment with silane and hydrogen peroxide plus silane afforded similar bond strength (11.4 ±6.4 and 10.7 ±5.6 MPa, respectively), which was higher as compared with the bond strength obtained after surface treatment with hydrogen peroxide. For both post types, the bond strength decreased from the cervical (12.2 ±6.0 MPa) to the middle (9.7 ±5.0 MPa) and apical (6.5 ±3.6 MPa) thirds. Light transmission and bond strength decreased from the cervical to the apical third. Surface treatment impacted bond strength; light transmission through Whiteposts was slightly higher than light transmission through Superposts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33431176
pii: S0022-3913(20)30757-5
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.031
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Resin Cements
0
fiberglass
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
674.e1-674.e7Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.