Health Service Utilization Patterns Among Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: A Population-Based Study.
Ambulatory Care
/ methods
Cardiology Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ statistics & numerical data
Ethnicity
Female
Health Services Accessibility
/ statistics & numerical data
Health Services Needs and Demand
Heart Defects, Congenital
/ epidemiology
Hospitalization
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Israel
/ epidemiology
Length of Stay
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
/ ethnology
Primary Health Care
/ methods
Severity of Illness Index
Sex Factors
adult congenital heart disease
healthcare service utilization
mortality
population‐based study
Journal
Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 01 2021
19 01 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
15
10
2021
entrez:
12
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Several studies have examined hospitalizations among patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD). Few investigated other services or utilization patterns. Our aim was to study service utilization patterns and predictors among patients with ACHD. Methods and Results We identified 11 653 patients with ACHD aged ≥18 years (median, 47 years), through electronic records of 2 large Israeli healthcare providers (2007-2011). The association between patient, disease, and sociogeographic characteristics and healthcare resource utilization were modeled as recurrent events accounting for the competing death risk. Patients with ACHD had high healthcare utilization rates compared with the general population. The highest standardized service utilization ratios (SSRs) were found among patients with complex congenital heart disease including primary care visits (SSR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.47-1.58), cardiology outpatient visits (SSR, 5.17; 95% CI, 4.69-5.64), hospitalizations (SSR, 6.68; 95% CI, 5.82-7.54), and days in hospital (SSR, 15.37; 95% CI, 14.61-16.12). Adjusted resource utilization hazard increased with increasing lesion complexity. Hazard ratios (HRs) for complex versus simple disease were: primary care (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.06-1.23); cardiology outpatient visits (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.24-1.59); emergency department visits (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39); and hospitalizations (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.49-2.05). Effects attenuated with age for cardiology outpatient visits and hospitalizations and increased for emergency department visits. Female sex, geographic periphery, and ethnic minority were associated with more primary care visits, and female sex (HR versus men, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.84-0.94]) and periphery (HR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.58-0.90] for very peripheral versus very central) were associated with fewer cardiology visits. Arab minority patients also had high hospitalization rates compared with the majority group of Jewish or other patients. Conclusions Healthcare utilization rates were high among patients with ACHD. Female sex, geographic periphery, and ethnicity were associated with less optimal service utilization patterns. Further research should examine strategies to optimize service utilization in these groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33432841
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018037
pmc: PMC7955316
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e018037Références
Circulation. 2015 Dec 1;132(22):2118-25
pubmed: 26369353
Eur Heart J. 2014 Mar;35(11):725-32
pubmed: 23882067
Heart. 2008 Sep;94(9):1194-9
pubmed: 17646191
Cardiol Young. 2019 May;29(5):553-563
pubmed: 31046858
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jan 19;5(1):
pubmed: 26786543
Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12 Suppl):S410-9
pubmed: 25432136
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 27;58(14):1509-15
pubmed: 21939837
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Sep 15;195:326-33
pubmed: 26056966
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1008-19
pubmed: 17489901
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jan 19;10(2):e018037
pubmed: 33432841
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Feb;32(2):197-203
pubmed: 26341305
Heart. 2008 Mar;94(3):342-8
pubmed: 17646196
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1170-5
pubmed: 11300418
Eur Heart J. 2010 Dec;31(23):2915-57
pubmed: 20801927
Arch Dis Child. 1996 Feb;74(2):121-5
pubmed: 8660073
Congenit Heart Dis. 2018 Jan;13(1):59-64
pubmed: 29266726
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 28;54(5):460-7
pubmed: 19628123
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 27;49(8):875-82
pubmed: 17320746
Am J Cardiol. 2007 Mar 15;99(6):839-43
pubmed: 17350378
Lifetime Data Anal. 2019 Oct;25(4):681-695
pubmed: 30697652
Heart. 2010 Jun;96(11):872-8
pubmed: 20406765
Neth Heart J. 2009 Nov;17(11):414-7
pubmed: 19949709
Korean Circ J. 2015 Jan;45(1):59-66
pubmed: 25653705
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:269-274
pubmed: 27240150
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
Int J Cardiol. 2011 Aug 18;151(1):54-7
pubmed: 20570378
Circulation. 2007 Jan 16;115(2):163-72
pubmed: 17210844
Stat Med. 1982 Jan-Mar;1(1):37-9
pubmed: 7187081
Heart. 2017 Aug;103(16):1258-1263
pubmed: 28237970
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Feb 1;228:23-30
pubmed: 27863357
Heart. 1999 Jan;81(1):57-61
pubmed: 10220546
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 12;7(2):
pubmed: 29330259
Cardiol Young. 2018 Jun;28(6):844-853
pubmed: 29704902