Health Literacy: An Interactive Outcome Among Secondary Students in Beijing.
Journal
Health literacy research and practice
ISSN: 2474-8307
Titre abrégé: Health Lit Res Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101712185
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 01 2021
11 01 2021
Historique:
received:
11
08
2019
accepted:
01
02
2020
entrez:
12
1
2021
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
7
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Health literacy enables a person to make good decisions regarding health care, disease prevention, and health promotion to maintain and improve health. Although health literacy research in China has gained increasing attention in recent years, most existing studies focus on adults rather than adolescents. In addition, little theory-driven empirical research has been conducted to fully understand the relationship among health literacy, its influencing factors, and health outcomes scored on a skills-based health literacy instrument. This study applied Manganello's framework to investigate how health literacy was related to its antecedents and health status in secondary students in Beijing, China. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 650 students in Years 7 to 9 (age 11-17 years) from four secondary schools. Students completed a self-administered questionnaire based on Manganello's health literacy framework, which measured key upstream determinants, including health literacy and self-report health status. Health literacy was measured on an 8-item skills-based instrument that assesses a person's ability to find, understand, appraise, and communicate health information in everyday life (scores range from 0-37). Descriptive statistics and path analysis were conducted to investigate the mediating role of health literacy in predicting health status. Overall, the average scores of students' health literacy was 26.37 (±5.89). Manganello's framework was supported by the data collected (χ Adolescent health literacy is not only a person's capability to protect health, but also an interactive outcome with the broader environment. Promoting health literacy could be a useful strategy to improve health status for adolescents; however, a holistic approach is needed to increase students' self-efficacy, promote social support, and create positive school environments to achieve optimal health literacy and health outcomes. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(1):e1-e14.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We investigated how health literacy was related to its influencing factors and health status among secondary students in Years 7 to 9 in Beijing, China. Students with low self-efficacy, low social support, and low perceptions of positive school environment were more likely to have low health literacy, which in turn predicted poor health status.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Health literacy enables a person to make good decisions regarding health care, disease prevention, and health promotion to maintain and improve health. Although health literacy research in China has gained increasing attention in recent years, most existing studies focus on adults rather than adolescents. In addition, little theory-driven empirical research has been conducted to fully understand the relationship among health literacy, its influencing factors, and health outcomes scored on a skills-based health literacy instrument.
OBJECTIVE
This study applied Manganello's framework to investigate how health literacy was related to its antecedents and health status in secondary students in Beijing, China.
METHODS
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 650 students in Years 7 to 9 (age 11-17 years) from four secondary schools. Students completed a self-administered questionnaire based on Manganello's health literacy framework, which measured key upstream determinants, including health literacy and self-report health status. Health literacy was measured on an 8-item skills-based instrument that assesses a person's ability to find, understand, appraise, and communicate health information in everyday life (scores range from 0-37). Descriptive statistics and path analysis were conducted to investigate the mediating role of health literacy in predicting health status.
KEY RESULTS
Overall, the average scores of students' health literacy was 26.37 (±5.89). Manganello's framework was supported by the data collected (χ
CONCLUSIONS
Adolescent health literacy is not only a person's capability to protect health, but also an interactive outcome with the broader environment. Promoting health literacy could be a useful strategy to improve health status for adolescents; however, a holistic approach is needed to increase students' self-efficacy, promote social support, and create positive school environments to achieve optimal health literacy and health outcomes. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2021;5(1):e1-e14.] PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We investigated how health literacy was related to its influencing factors and health status among secondary students in Years 7 to 9 in Beijing, China. Students with low self-efficacy, low social support, and low perceptions of positive school environment were more likely to have low health literacy, which in turn predicted poor health status.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33433628
doi: 10.3928/24748307-20201117-01
pmc: PMC7801261
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1-e14Informations de copyright
©2021 Guo, Yu, Davis, et al.
Références
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2014 Jul;19(3):210-8
pubmed: 24612548
Health Promot Int. 2010 Dec;25(4):444-52
pubmed: 20466776
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 12;14(6):
pubmed: 28604645
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107
pubmed: 21768583
J Clin Nurs. 2011 Jan;20(1-2):190-6
pubmed: 20629822
Am J Community Psychol. 2009 Dec;44(3-4):350-62
pubmed: 19838790
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30(3):725-35
pubmed: 24482542
J Sch Health. 2012 Jan;82(1):28-36
pubmed: 22142172
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(12):2072-8
pubmed: 18952344
J Health Commun. 2011;16 Suppl 3:103-18
pubmed: 21951246
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S282-8
pubmed: 19861482
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 14;16(18):
pubmed: 31540040
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 10;19(1):300
pubmed: 31077197
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jun;99(6):1033-7
pubmed: 26809936
J Child Health Care. 2017 Mar;21(1):5-13
pubmed: 27091957
Health Educ Res. 2011 Apr;26(2):308-22
pubmed: 21321008
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:453
pubmed: 21658232
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(20):8735-40
pubmed: 25374199
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e020080
pubmed: 29903787
Health Educ Res. 2008 Oct;23(5):840-7
pubmed: 18024979
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78
pubmed: 27174304
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 21;19(1):221
pubmed: 30791882
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 12;19(1):1259
pubmed: 31510983
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2016 Jun;5(2):106-18
pubmed: 26859721
Glob Health Promot. 2017 Dec;24(4):81-89
pubmed: 27216873
Glob Health Promot. 2018 Dec;25(4):6-14
pubmed: 29638175
Pediatrics. 2009 Nov;124 Suppl 3:S262-4
pubmed: 19861479
J Adolesc Health. 2001 Aug;29(2):140-9
pubmed: 11472873
J Adolesc. 2018 Jan;62:116-127
pubmed: 29179126
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Aug 03;15(8):
pubmed: 30081465
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Aug 29;4:57
pubmed: 16939653
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):361
pubmed: 28441934
Health Educ Behav. 2010 Oct;37(5):621-44
pubmed: 20729347
Health Promot Int. 2001 Jun;16(2):197-205
pubmed: 11356758
J Sch Health. 2005 Aug;75(6):226-8
pubmed: 16014129
Arch Public Health. 2014 Apr 01;72(1):11
pubmed: 24685203