Effects of Invisalign (G5) with virtual bite ramps for skeletal deep overbite malocclusion correction in adults.
Adult
Clear aligners
Deep bite
Fixed appliances
Journal
The Angle orthodontist
ISSN: 1945-7103
Titre abrégé: Angle Orthod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370550
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2021
01 03 2021
Historique:
accepted:
01
10
2020
received:
01
07
2020
pubmed:
13
1
2021
medline:
23
3
2021
entrez:
12
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Invisalign's G5 protocol with virtual bite ramps in the treatment of adults with skeletal deep bites. This retrospective study was conducted on consecutively treated adults presenting with skeletal deep bites as defined by the Overbite Depth Indicator (ODI). Subjects were divided into 2 groups: Invisalign group (n = 24) treated with the Invisalign G5 protocol and a full fixed appliance (FFA) group (n = 24) treated with edgewise FFAs and matched to the Invisalign group by ODI, sex, type of malocclusion, and non-extraction treatment. Pretreatment (T1) and post-comprehensive treatment (T2) lateral cephalograms were obtained and analyzed. Both the Invisalign and FFA groups showed significant changes from T1 to T2 in ODI and other skeletal and dentoalveolar measurements. The mean change in ODI was -1.5° (P < .001) for the Invisalign group and -2.0° (P < .001) for the FFA group. The mean decrease in overbite was 1.3 mm (P < .001) and 2.0 mm (P < .001) for the Invisalign and FFA groups, respectively. The mean increase in mandibular plane angle (Sn-GoGn) was 0.65° (P = .003) for the Invisalign group and 1.15° (P < .001) for the FFA group. When the groups were compared with each other, both ODI (P = .03) and overbite (P = .003) were significantly different in addition to other measurements. Although FFA treatment had more apparent skeletal changes for deep bite adult patients when compared with Invisalign, both systems were effective in opening deep bites at dentoalveolar and skeletal levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33434276
pii: 450971
doi: 10.2319/072220-646.1
pmc: PMC8028480
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
164-170Informations de copyright
© 2021 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
Références
J Clin Orthod. 2005 Apr;39(4):245-58
pubmed: 15888956
Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Jan;41(1):67-87
pubmed: 9023063
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jan;95(1):72-8
pubmed: 2910029
J Dent Educ. 2008 Aug;72(8):948-67
pubmed: 18676803
J World Fed Orthod. 2012 Sep 1;1(3):e89-e86
pubmed: 23630651
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Sep;144(3):414-9
pubmed: 23992814
Am J Orthod. 1974 Jun;65(6):586-611
pubmed: 4524490
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Apr;107(4):382-93
pubmed: 7709903
Aust Orthod J. 2009 May;25(1):34-40
pubmed: 19634462
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):292-8; discussion 298
pubmed: 16168325
Eur J Orthod. 1983 Feb;5(1):75-83
pubmed: 6572597
J Clin Orthod. 2010 Jan;44(1):28-35
pubmed: 20503653
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):691-699.e2
pubmed: 28364892
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Oct;100(4):370-5
pubmed: 1927988
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Jul;142(1):75-82
pubmed: 22748993
Am J Orthod. 1980 Jan;77(1):1-13
pubmed: 6928081