Race-Specific Comparisons of Antihypertensive and Metabolic Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Chlorthalidone.


Journal

The American journal of medicine
ISSN: 1555-7162
Titre abrégé: Am J Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0267200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2021
Historique:
received: 07 12 2020
accepted: 07 12 2020
pubmed: 13 1 2021
medline: 31 8 2021
entrez: 12 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Chlorthalidone is recommended over hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) as the preferred thiazide, but the supporting evidence is not robust at routinely used doses, or in whites vs blacks, in whom differences in response to thiazides are well known. We compare the efficacy and safety of HCTZ and chlorthalidone as first-line therapies for white and black hypertensive patients. We compared treatment-related outcomes between the HCTZ arm (12.5 mg for 2-3 weeks; 25 mg for additional 6 weeks) of the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR, n = 376) and chlorthalidone arm (15 mg for 2 weeks; 25 mg for additional 6 weeks) of PEAR-2 (n = 326) clinical trials, in 17-65-year-old mild-moderate uncomplicated hypertensive whites and blacks. Mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) reduction with HCTZ vs chlorthalidone: 8 ± 8/4 ± 5 vs 12 ± 9/7 ± 5 mm Hg in whites (P < 10 Compared with HCTZ, chlorthalidone showed greater blood pressure lowering and adverse metabolic effects in whites, but similar blood pressure lowering and greater adverse effects in blacks; suggesting that the recent guideline recommendations to choose chlorthalidone over HCTZ may not be warranted in blacks.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Chlorthalidone is recommended over hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) as the preferred thiazide, but the supporting evidence is not robust at routinely used doses, or in whites vs blacks, in whom differences in response to thiazides are well known. We compare the efficacy and safety of HCTZ and chlorthalidone as first-line therapies for white and black hypertensive patients.
METHODS
We compared treatment-related outcomes between the HCTZ arm (12.5 mg for 2-3 weeks; 25 mg for additional 6 weeks) of the Pharmacogenomic Evaluation of Antihypertensive Responses (PEAR, n = 376) and chlorthalidone arm (15 mg for 2 weeks; 25 mg for additional 6 weeks) of PEAR-2 (n = 326) clinical trials, in 17-65-year-old mild-moderate uncomplicated hypertensive whites and blacks.
RESULTS
Mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) reduction with HCTZ vs chlorthalidone: 8 ± 8/4 ± 5 vs 12 ± 9/7 ± 5 mm Hg in whites (P < 10
CONCLUSION
Compared with HCTZ, chlorthalidone showed greater blood pressure lowering and adverse metabolic effects in whites, but similar blood pressure lowering and greater adverse effects in blacks; suggesting that the recent guideline recommendations to choose chlorthalidone over HCTZ may not be warranted in blacks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33434556
pii: S0002-9343(21)00007-3
doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.12.015
pmc: PMC8243781
mid: NIHMS1675843
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antihypertensive Agents 0
Hydrochlorothiazide 0J48LPH2TH
Chlorthalidone Q0MQD1073Q

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

918-925.e2

Subventions

Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U01 GM074492
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000064
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000135
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000454
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Apr 1;180(4):542-551
pubmed: 32065600
Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(1):c8-16
pubmed: 22156587
Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Aug;70(2):244-251
pubmed: 28363732
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Aug;96(2):175-81
pubmed: 24637943
Hypertension. 2015 May;65(5):1041-6
pubmed: 25733245
J Hypertens. 2019 Aug;37(8):1574-1586
pubmed: 30882593
Hypertension. 2011 Apr;57(4):689-94
pubmed: 21383313
Hypertension. 2003 Dec;42(6):1206-52
pubmed: 14656957
Am J Med. 2007 Apr;120(4 Suppl 1):S10-20
pubmed: 17403377
JAMA. 2005 Apr 6;293(13):1595-608
pubmed: 15811979
Hypertension. 2010 Nov;56(5):780-800
pubmed: 20921433
Can J Cardiol. 2018 May;34(5):506-525
pubmed: 29731013
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 29;(5):CD003824
pubmed: 24869750
Hypertension. 2012 Jun;59(6):1104-9
pubmed: 22547443
Hypertension. 2006 Mar;47(3):352-8
pubmed: 16432050
Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1383-93
pubmed: 18809808
Hypertension. 2009 Nov;54(5):951-3
pubmed: 19752290
Hypertension. 2011 Apr;57(4):665-6
pubmed: 21383308
Am Heart J. 2009 Mar;157(3):442-9
pubmed: 19249413
Am J Clin Nutr. 2011 May;93(5):1087-91
pubmed: 21367942
Hypertension. 2004 Jan;43(1):4-9
pubmed: 14638621
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 30;330(26):1852-7
pubmed: 8196728
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 2;67(4):379-389
pubmed: 26821625
Am J Hypertens. 2002 Feb;15(2 Pt 1):101-4
pubmed: 11863243
Int J Prev Med. 2010 Fall;1(4):217-9
pubmed: 21566775
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jan;64(1):121-9
pubmed: 22031222
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Sep 11;160(16):2429-36
pubmed: 10979053
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 18;381(3):243-251
pubmed: 31314968
Hypertension. 2015 Feb;65(2):401-6
pubmed: 25403604
Cardiol Rev. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):51-6
pubmed: 20010338
Endocr Connect. 2018 Apr;7(4):R135-R146
pubmed: 29540487
JAMA. 2002 Dec 18;288(23):2981-97
pubmed: 12479763
JAMA. 1992 Feb 26;267(8):1083-9
pubmed: 1735925
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Apr;3(2):157-74
pubmed: 19299428
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 19;158(6):447-55
pubmed: 23552325
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115
pubmed: 29133356
Hypertension. 2009 Aug;54(2):181-7
pubmed: 19581514
Am J Hypertens. 2010 Apr;23(4):440-6
pubmed: 20111008
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2018 Jul;20(7):1104-1107
pubmed: 30003698
Am J Hypertens. 2016 Oct;29(10):1130-7
pubmed: 27048970
BMC Med. 2013 May 30;11:141
pubmed: 23721258
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Feb;17(2):134-40
pubmed: 25496048
J Hypertens. 2018 Oct;36(10):1953-2041
pubmed: 30234752
Am J Hypertens. 2018 Jan 12;31(2):133-135
pubmed: 29228096
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;165(9):663-664
pubmed: 27538129
Am J Hypertens. 2012 Mar;25(3):359-65
pubmed: 22089105

Auteurs

Lakshmi Manasa S Chekka (LMS)

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Arlene B Chapman (AB)

Division of Nephrology, University of Chicago, Illinois.

John G Gums (JG)

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Rhonda M Cooper-DeHoff (RM)

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

Julie A Johnson (JA)

Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. Electronic address: julie.johnson@ufl.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH