Dual Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition With Sacubitril/Valsartan Attenuates Systolic Dysfunction in Experimental Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.

anthracycline echocardiography preclinical study treatment

Journal

JACC. CardioOncology
ISSN: 2666-0873
Titre abrégé: JACC CardioOncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101761697

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez: 13 1 2021
pubmed: 14 1 2021
medline: 14 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Doxorubicin (DOX) induces cardiotoxicity in part by activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) exerts additive cardioprotective actions over renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in preclinical models of myocardial infarction and in heart failure patients. We hypothesized that Sac/Val would be more cardioprotective than Val in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, and this benefit would be associated with modulation of MMP activation. We sought to investigate the efficacy of Sac/Val for the treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity. Male Wistar rats received DOX intraperitoneally (15 mg/kg cumulative) or saline over 3 weeks. Following the first treatment, control animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), while DOX-treated animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), Val (31 mg/kg; n = 25) or Sac/Val (68 mg/kg; n = 25) for either 4 or 6 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, and 4 and 6 weeks after DOX initiation. In addition, myocardial MMP activity was assessed with Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased by 10% at 6 weeks in DOX and DOX + Val rats (both p < 0.05), while this reduction was attenuated in DOX + Sac/Val rats. MMP activity was increased at 6 weeks by 76% in DOX-alone rats, and tended to increase in DOX + Val rats (36%; p = 0.051) but was similar in DOX + Sac/Val rats as compared with time-matched control animals. Both therapies attenuated histological evidence of cellular toxicity and fibrosis (p < 0.05). Sac/Val offers greater protection against left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction compared with standard angiotensin receptor blocker therapy in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Doxorubicin (DOX) induces cardiotoxicity in part by activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val) exerts additive cardioprotective actions over renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors in preclinical models of myocardial infarction and in heart failure patients. We hypothesized that Sac/Val would be more cardioprotective than Val in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity, and this benefit would be associated with modulation of MMP activation.
OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
We sought to investigate the efficacy of Sac/Val for the treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.
METHODS METHODS
Male Wistar rats received DOX intraperitoneally (15 mg/kg cumulative) or saline over 3 weeks. Following the first treatment, control animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), while DOX-treated animals were gavaged daily with water (n = 25), Val (31 mg/kg; n = 25) or Sac/Val (68 mg/kg; n = 25) for either 4 or 6 weeks. Echocardiography was performed at baseline, and 4 and 6 weeks after DOX initiation. In addition, myocardial MMP activity was assessed with
RESULTS RESULTS
Left ventricular ejection fraction decreased by 10% at 6 weeks in DOX and DOX + Val rats (both p < 0.05), while this reduction was attenuated in DOX + Sac/Val rats. MMP activity was increased at 6 weeks by 76% in DOX-alone rats, and tended to increase in DOX + Val rats (36%; p = 0.051) but was similar in DOX + Sac/Val rats as compared with time-matched control animals. Both therapies attenuated histological evidence of cellular toxicity and fibrosis (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Sac/Val offers greater protection against left ventricular remodeling and dysfunction compared with standard angiotensin receptor blocker therapy in a rodent model of progressive DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33437965
doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.09.007
pmc: PMC7799406
mid: NIHMS1657610
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

774-787

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL098069
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Références

J Nucl Cardiol. 2016 Aug;23(4):856-84
pubmed: 27251147
Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Jun;36(6):326-48
pubmed: 25895646
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2017 Jul;108:138-148
pubmed: 28623750
Circulation. 2006 Dec 5;114(23):2474-81
pubmed: 17101852
Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):487.e1-7
pubmed: 20826257
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2018 May 30;3(3):378-390
pubmed: 30062224
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;62(12):1776-83
pubmed: 21054405
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012 Apr;33(4):459-69
pubmed: 22447222
Cardiovasc Res. 2006 Feb 1;69(2):318-28
pubmed: 16289003
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2231-47
pubmed: 19520246
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Jan 1;117(1):188-200
pubmed: 31995179
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 1;22(5):820-8
pubmed: 14990637
Cardiooncology. 2018;4:
pubmed: 29900007
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Nov 02;9:6785-6794
pubmed: 27843329
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:192-198
pubmed: 29544929
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jan 19;55(3):213-20
pubmed: 20117401
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;35(5):1924-33
pubmed: 25871735
Am J Hematol. 2010 Nov;85(11):894-6
pubmed: 20872550
Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2011 Nov;32(11):1345-50
pubmed: 21963897
J Med Chem. 2001 Aug 2;44(16):2636-60
pubmed: 11472217
Hypertens Res. 2002 Jul;25(4):597-603
pubmed: 12358147
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):13144-13149
pubmed: 27799559
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Oct;28(10):1087-93
pubmed: 19782292
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;4(4):381-91
pubmed: 21505092
Sci Rep. 2019 Apr 8;9(1):5791
pubmed: 30962467
J Clin Pharmacol. 2010 Apr;50(4):401-14
pubmed: 19934029
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2017 Dec 25;2(6):655-668
pubmed: 30062181
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25):2451-2452
pubmed: 24013048
Ann Oncol. 2001 Jul;12(7):963-6
pubmed: 11521803
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015 Apr 03;13:18
pubmed: 25889218
Circulation. 2005 Nov 15;112(20):3157-67
pubmed: 16275862

Auteurs

Nabil E Boutagy (NE)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Attila Feher (A)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Daniel Pfau (D)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Zhao Liu (Z)

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Nicole M Guerrera (NM)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Lisa A Freeburg (LA)

Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Sydney J Womack (SJ)

Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Abigail C Hoenes (AC)

Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Caroline Zeiss (C)

Section of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Lawrence H Young (LH)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Francis G Spinale (FG)

Department of Cell Biology & Anatomy, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Columbia, South Carolina, USA.

Albert J Sinusas (AJ)

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Yale Translational Research Imaging Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Classifications MeSH