Utility of Flow Cytometry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Follow-up Monitoring of Plasma Cell Myeloma.
Aged
Antibodies, Monoclonal
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Cohort Studies
Female
Flow Cytometry
/ methods
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
/ methods
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple Myeloma
/ diagnosis
Neoplasm, Residual
/ diagnosis
Retrospective Studies
FISH
Flow cytometry
Follow-up
Minimal residual disease
Plasma cell myeloma
Journal
American journal of clinical pathology
ISSN: 1943-7722
Titre abrégé: Am J Clin Pathol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370470
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 07 2021
06 07 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
14
1
2021
medline:
27
8
2021
entrez:
13
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to investigate the clinical utility of flow cytometry (FC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the workup of myeloma. We retrospectively reviewed the reports of bone marrow biopsies received for myeloma evaluation between October 2015 and January 2019. A total of 1,708 biopsy specimens from 469 myeloma patients (mean age, 64.5 years [SD, 9.3]; female, 41.4%) were reviewed. Both FC and FISH had comparable detection rates at the time of initial diagnosis (97.6% vs 98.8%) and for follow-up cases (28.6% vs 28.2%). FC and FISH results were concordant in 98.8% of the initial diagnosis cases and 89.6% of the follow-up cases. The FISH-positive (FISH+)/FC-negative (FC-) discordance and FISH-/FC+ discordance occurred among 81 (5.0%) and 87 (5.4%) follow-up cases. In comparison with all concordant cases, FISH+/FC- discordant cases were more likely to have received treatment with daratumumab (P < .05). Plasma cell-enriched FISH and FC have comparable abnormal plasma cell detection rates, and approximately 10% of the follow-up cases have discordant FISH and FC results in which residual disease is detected by only one of these modalities. FISH testing should be considered for cases with negative FC, especially in patients who have received treatment with daratumumab or in cases in which there is concern about specimen adequacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33437993
pii: 6092407
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa224
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal
0
Antineoplastic Agents
0
daratumumab
4Z63YK6E0E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
198-204Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.