The Human Factor in Automated Image-Based Nutrition Apps: Analysis of Common Mistakes Using the goFOOD Lite App.


Journal

JMIR mHealth and uHealth
ISSN: 2291-5222
Titre abrégé: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101624439

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 01 2021
Historique:
received: 21 09 2020
accepted: 30 11 2020
revised: 02 11 2020
entrez: 13 1 2021
pubmed: 14 1 2021
medline: 28 4 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Technological advancements have enabled nutrient estimation by smartphone apps such as goFOOD. This is an artificial intelligence-based smartphone system, which uses food images or video captured by the user as input and then translates these into estimates of nutrient content. The quality of the data is highly dependent on the images the user records. This can lead to a major loss of data and impaired quality. Instead of removing these data from the study, in-depth analysis is needed to explore common mistakes and to use them for further improvement of automated apps for nutrition assessment. The aim of this study is to analyze common mistakes made by participants using the goFOOD Lite app, a version of goFOOD, which was designed for food-logging, but without providing results to the users, to improve both the instructions provided and the automated functionalities of the app. The 48 study participants were given face-to-face instructions for goFOOD Lite and were asked to record 2 pictures (1 recording) before and 2 pictures (1 recording) after the daily consumption of each food or beverage, using a reference card as a fiducial marker. All pictures that were discarded for processing due to mistakes were analyzed to record the main mistakes made by users. Of the 468 recordings of nonpackaged food items captured by the app, 60 (12.8%) had to be discarded due to errors in the capturing procedure. The principal problems were as follows: wrong fiducial marker or improper marker use (19 recordings), plate issues such as a noncompatible or nonvisible plate (8 recordings), a combination of various issues (17 recordings), and other reasons such as obstacles (hand) in front of the camera or matching recording pairs (16 recordings). No other study has focused on the principal problems in the use of automatic apps for assessing nutritional intake. This study shows that it is important to provide study participants with detailed instructions if high-quality data are to be obtained. Future developments could focus on making it easier to recognize food on various plates from its color or shape and on exploring alternatives to using fiducial markers. It is also essential for future studies to understand the training needed by the participants as well as to enhance the app's user-friendliness and to develop automatic image checks based on participant feedback.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Technological advancements have enabled nutrient estimation by smartphone apps such as goFOOD. This is an artificial intelligence-based smartphone system, which uses food images or video captured by the user as input and then translates these into estimates of nutrient content. The quality of the data is highly dependent on the images the user records. This can lead to a major loss of data and impaired quality. Instead of removing these data from the study, in-depth analysis is needed to explore common mistakes and to use them for further improvement of automated apps for nutrition assessment.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to analyze common mistakes made by participants using the goFOOD Lite app, a version of goFOOD, which was designed for food-logging, but without providing results to the users, to improve both the instructions provided and the automated functionalities of the app.
METHODS
The 48 study participants were given face-to-face instructions for goFOOD Lite and were asked to record 2 pictures (1 recording) before and 2 pictures (1 recording) after the daily consumption of each food or beverage, using a reference card as a fiducial marker. All pictures that were discarded for processing due to mistakes were analyzed to record the main mistakes made by users.
RESULTS
Of the 468 recordings of nonpackaged food items captured by the app, 60 (12.8%) had to be discarded due to errors in the capturing procedure. The principal problems were as follows: wrong fiducial marker or improper marker use (19 recordings), plate issues such as a noncompatible or nonvisible plate (8 recordings), a combination of various issues (17 recordings), and other reasons such as obstacles (hand) in front of the camera or matching recording pairs (16 recordings).
CONCLUSIONS
No other study has focused on the principal problems in the use of automatic apps for assessing nutritional intake. This study shows that it is important to provide study participants with detailed instructions if high-quality data are to be obtained. Future developments could focus on making it easier to recognize food on various plates from its color or shape and on exploring alternatives to using fiducial markers. It is also essential for future studies to understand the training needed by the participants as well as to enhance the app's user-friendliness and to develop automatic image checks based on participant feedback.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33439139
pii: v9i1e24467
doi: 10.2196/24467
pmc: PMC7840289
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e24467

Informations de copyright

©Maria F Vasiloglou, Klazine van der Horst, Thomai Stathopoulou, Michael P Jaeggi, Giulia S Tedde, Ya Lu, Stavroula Mougiakakou. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 13.01.2021.

Références

Nutrition. 2005 Jun;21(6):672-7
pubmed: 15925290
Proc Nutr Soc. 2017 Aug;76(3):213-219
pubmed: 28162110
JMIR Res Protoc. 2016 Nov 02;5(4):e208
pubmed: 27806922
J Clin Med. 2019 Jul 20;8(7):
pubmed: 31330781
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Jan;110(1):74-9
pubmed: 20102830
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;20(15):
pubmed: 32752007
Nutrients. 2018 Jun 07;10(6):
pubmed: 29880772
Nutr J. 2018 Jan 09;17(1):5
pubmed: 29316930
Br J Nutr. 2009 Jul;101 Suppl 2:S73-85
pubmed: 19594967
Nutrition. 2014 Nov-Dec;30(11-12):1257-66
pubmed: 24976425
Nutrients. 2020 Jul 24;12(8):
pubmed: 32722339
J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 11;18(5):e101
pubmed: 27170498
Diabetes Care. 2017 Feb;40(2):e6-e7
pubmed: 27899490
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Apr;20(4):891-9
pubmed: 22134199
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May;9(3):507-15
pubmed: 25883163
Nutrients. 2018 Aug 10;10(8):
pubmed: 30103401
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 13;3(1):e30
pubmed: 25775506
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Apr 13;14(2):e58
pubmed: 22504018
Nutrients. 2017 Jan 18;9(1):
pubmed: 28106767

Auteurs

Maria F Vasiloglou (MF)

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Klazine van der Horst (K)

Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

Thomai Stathopoulou (T)

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Michael P Jaeggi (MP)

Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

Giulia S Tedde (GS)

Department of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

Ya Lu (Y)

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Stavroula Mougiakakou (S)

ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH