Assessment of local supply chains and stock management practices for trauma care resources in Ghana: a comparative small sample cross-sectional study.
Ghana
Operations
Stock management
Supply chain
Surgery
Trauma
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2021
13 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
02
04
2020
accepted:
06
01
2021
entrez:
14
1
2021
pubmed:
15
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Injuries are a major public health problem globally. With sound planning and organization, essential trauma care can be reliably provided with relatively low-cost equipment and supplies. However, availability of these resources requires an effective and efficient supply chain and good stock management practices. Therefore, this study aimed to assess trauma care resource-related supply management structures and processes at health facilities in Ghana. By doing so, the findings may allow us to identify specific structures and processes that could be improved to facilitate higher quality and more timely care. Ten hospitals were purposively selected using results from a previously performed national trauma care capacity assessment of hospitals of all levels in Ghana. Five hospitals with low resource availability and 5 hospitals with high resource availability were assessed using the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Logistics Indicators Assessment Tool and stock ledger review. Data were described and stock management practices were correlated with resource availability. There were differences in stock management practices between low and high resource availability hospitals, including frequency of reporting and audit, number of stock-outs on day of assessment (median 9 vs 2 stock-outs, range 3-57 vs 0-9 stock-outs, respectively; p = 0.05), duration of stock-outs (median 171 vs 8 days, range 51-1268 vs 0-182 days, respectively; p = 0.02), and fewer of up-to-date stock cards (24 vs 31 up-to-date stock cards, respectively; p = 0.07). Stock-outs were common even among low-cost, essential resources (e.g., nasal cannulas and oxygen masks, endotracheal tubes, syringes, sutures, sterile gloves). Increased adherence to stock management guidelines and higher percentage of up-to-date stock cards were correlated with higher trauma resource availability scores. However, the variance in trauma resource availability scores was poorly explained by these individual factors or when analyzed in a multivariate regression model (r Good supply chain and stock management practices are correlated with high trauma care resource availability. The findings from this study demonstrate several opportunities to improve stock management practices, particularly at low resource availability hospitals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Injuries are a major public health problem globally. With sound planning and organization, essential trauma care can be reliably provided with relatively low-cost equipment and supplies. However, availability of these resources requires an effective and efficient supply chain and good stock management practices. Therefore, this study aimed to assess trauma care resource-related supply management structures and processes at health facilities in Ghana. By doing so, the findings may allow us to identify specific structures and processes that could be improved to facilitate higher quality and more timely care.
METHODS
METHODS
Ten hospitals were purposively selected using results from a previously performed national trauma care capacity assessment of hospitals of all levels in Ghana. Five hospitals with low resource availability and 5 hospitals with high resource availability were assessed using the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Logistics Indicators Assessment Tool and stock ledger review. Data were described and stock management practices were correlated with resource availability.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There were differences in stock management practices between low and high resource availability hospitals, including frequency of reporting and audit, number of stock-outs on day of assessment (median 9 vs 2 stock-outs, range 3-57 vs 0-9 stock-outs, respectively; p = 0.05), duration of stock-outs (median 171 vs 8 days, range 51-1268 vs 0-182 days, respectively; p = 0.02), and fewer of up-to-date stock cards (24 vs 31 up-to-date stock cards, respectively; p = 0.07). Stock-outs were common even among low-cost, essential resources (e.g., nasal cannulas and oxygen masks, endotracheal tubes, syringes, sutures, sterile gloves). Increased adherence to stock management guidelines and higher percentage of up-to-date stock cards were correlated with higher trauma resource availability scores. However, the variance in trauma resource availability scores was poorly explained by these individual factors or when analyzed in a multivariate regression model (r
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Good supply chain and stock management practices are correlated with high trauma care resource availability. The findings from this study demonstrate several opportunities to improve stock management practices, particularly at low resource availability hospitals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33441147
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06063-6
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-06063-6
pmc: PMC7805234
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
66Subventions
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R25TW009345
Pays : United States
Organisme : National Institutes of Health (US)
ID : D43-TW007267
Organisme : University of Washington
ID : Department of Surgery Research Reinvestment Fund
Références
Malar J. 2010 Oct 27;9:298
pubmed: 20979633
World J Surg. 2015 Oct;39(10):2428-40
pubmed: 26154575
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Dec 16;1(4):e000075
pubmed: 28588976
JAMA Surg. 2016 Feb;151(2):164-71
pubmed: 26502036
Health Policy Plan. 2007 Mar;22(2):73-82
pubmed: 17324947
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Dec 10;2(4):395-402
pubmed: 25611474
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 2;17(1):313
pubmed: 28464850
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0211498
pubmed: 30811407
J Glob Health. 2014 Dec;4(2):020406
pubmed: 25520796
Health Syst Reform. 2015 Feb 17;1(2):142-154
pubmed: 31546312
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Nov;50(11):1922-7
pubmed: 25841284
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156026
pubmed: 27227412
Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Jan;72(1):61-6
pubmed: 26900225
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Jul;19(7):791-801
pubmed: 24724617
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014 Jul 10;2(3):285-94
pubmed: 25276588
Lancet. 2015 Aug 22;386(9995):743-800
pubmed: 26063472
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016 Sep 29;4(3):359-65
pubmed: 27688714
J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):217-22
pubmed: 25277355
Injury. 2018 Nov;49(11):1969-1978
pubmed: 30195833
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54066
pubmed: 23349786
PLoS One. 2010 Oct 15;5(10):e13414
pubmed: 20976211
Malar J. 2014 Jul 28;13:290
pubmed: 25066600
Health Syst Reform. 2019;5(2):158-177
pubmed: 31194645
Annu Rev Public Health. 2017 Mar 20;38:507-532
pubmed: 28125389
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):519
pubmed: 31340833
Health Policy Plan. 2001 Sep;16(3):273-80
pubmed: 11527868
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):74-75
pubmed: 27702551