A virtual-hybrid approach to launching a cardio-oncology clinic during a pandemic.
Cardio-oncology
Prevention
Telehealth
Telemedicine
Virtual care
Journal
Cardio-oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 2057-3804
Titre abrégé: Cardiooncology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101689938
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Jan 2021
13 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
06
10
2020
accepted:
08
12
2020
entrez:
14
1
2021
pubmed:
15
1
2021
medline:
15
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
As cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in cancer survivors, the new subspecialty of Cardio-Oncology has emerged to address prevention, monitoring, and management of cardiovascular toxicities to cancer therapies. During the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we developed a Virtual-Hybrid Approach to build a de novo Cardio-Oncology Clinic. We conceptualized a Virtual-Hybrid Approach including three arms: information seeking in locations with existing Cardio-Oncology clinics, information gathering at the location for a new clinic, and information sharing to report clinic-building outcomes. A retrospective review of outcomes included collection and synthesis of data from our first 3 months (at pandemic peak) on types of appointments, cancers, drugs, and cardiotoxicities. Data were presented using descriptive statistics. A de-novo Cardio-Oncology clinic was developed structured from the ground up to integrate virtual and in-person care in a hybrid and innovative model, using the three arms of the Virtual-Hybrid Approach. First, we garnered in-person and virtual preparation through hands-on experiences, training, and discussions in existing Cardio-Oncology Clinics and conferences. Next, we gleaned information through virtual inquiry and niche-building. With partners throughout the institution, a virtual referral process was established for outpatient referrals and inpatient e-consult referrals to actualize a hybrid care spectrum for our patients administered by a multidisciplinary hybrid care team of clinicians, ancillary support staff, and clinical pharmacists. Among the multi-subspecialty clinic sessions, approximately 50% were in Cardio-Oncology, 20% in Preventive Cardiology, and 30% in General Cardiology. In the hybrid model, the Heart & Vascular Center had started to re-open, allowing for 65% of our visits to be in person. In additional analyses, the most frequent cardiovascular diagnosis was cardiomyopathy (34%), the most common cancer drug leading to referral was trastuzumab (29%), and the most prevalent cancer type was breast cancer (42%). This Virtual-Hybrid Approach and retrospective review provides guidance and information regarding initiating a brand-new Cardio-Oncology Clinic during the pandemic for cancer patients/survivors. This report also furnishes virtual resources for patients, virtual tools for oncologists, cardiologists, and administrators tasked with starting new clinics during the pandemic, and innovative future directions for this digital pandemic to post-pandemic era.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
As cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death in cancer survivors, the new subspecialty of Cardio-Oncology has emerged to address prevention, monitoring, and management of cardiovascular toxicities to cancer therapies. During the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we developed a Virtual-Hybrid Approach to build a de novo Cardio-Oncology Clinic.
METHODS
METHODS
We conceptualized a Virtual-Hybrid Approach including three arms: information seeking in locations with existing Cardio-Oncology clinics, information gathering at the location for a new clinic, and information sharing to report clinic-building outcomes. A retrospective review of outcomes included collection and synthesis of data from our first 3 months (at pandemic peak) on types of appointments, cancers, drugs, and cardiotoxicities. Data were presented using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A de-novo Cardio-Oncology clinic was developed structured from the ground up to integrate virtual and in-person care in a hybrid and innovative model, using the three arms of the Virtual-Hybrid Approach. First, we garnered in-person and virtual preparation through hands-on experiences, training, and discussions in existing Cardio-Oncology Clinics and conferences. Next, we gleaned information through virtual inquiry and niche-building. With partners throughout the institution, a virtual referral process was established for outpatient referrals and inpatient e-consult referrals to actualize a hybrid care spectrum for our patients administered by a multidisciplinary hybrid care team of clinicians, ancillary support staff, and clinical pharmacists. Among the multi-subspecialty clinic sessions, approximately 50% were in Cardio-Oncology, 20% in Preventive Cardiology, and 30% in General Cardiology. In the hybrid model, the Heart & Vascular Center had started to re-open, allowing for 65% of our visits to be in person. In additional analyses, the most frequent cardiovascular diagnosis was cardiomyopathy (34%), the most common cancer drug leading to referral was trastuzumab (29%), and the most prevalent cancer type was breast cancer (42%).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This Virtual-Hybrid Approach and retrospective review provides guidance and information regarding initiating a brand-new Cardio-Oncology Clinic during the pandemic for cancer patients/survivors. This report also furnishes virtual resources for patients, virtual tools for oncologists, cardiologists, and administrators tasked with starting new clinics during the pandemic, and innovative future directions for this digital pandemic to post-pandemic era.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33441188
doi: 10.1186/s40959-020-00088-2
pii: 10.1186/s40959-020-00088-2
pmc: PMC7803880
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2Références
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):e015327
pubmed: 31960742
Heart Fail Clin. 2017 Apr;13(2):347-359
pubmed: 28279420
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Jan 10;6:187
pubmed: 31998754
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Oct 20;9(19):e017787
pubmed: 32713239
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Mar 1;112(3):256-265
pubmed: 31161223
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Sep;89(9):1287-306
pubmed: 25192616
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Jun;2(2):356-358
pubmed: 32328590
Cardiooncology. 2020 Sep 9;6:19
pubmed: 32922861
Curr Oncol. 2019 Jun;26(3):e322-e327
pubmed: 31285675
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Feb 9;67(5):476-85
pubmed: 26562047
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Dec 04;7:568720
pubmed: 33344513
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 May 28;22(6):60
pubmed: 32462289
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Jun;2(2):345-349
pubmed: 32309816
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;22(6):929-932
pubmed: 32441422
Cardiooncology. 2020 Jul 16;6:9
pubmed: 32690995
Oncol Rev. 2017 Jul 18;11(2):340
pubmed: 28781723
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 Aug 14;7:145
pubmed: 32923460
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Feb;107(3):443-50
pubmed: 17978870
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Feb 28;3(1):e000472
pubmed: 24584736
Future Cardiol. 2015 Jul;11(4):413-20
pubmed: 26238159
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Sep;27(9):911-39
pubmed: 25172399
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Jun;2(2):350-355
pubmed: 32292919
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 21;40(48):3913-3920
pubmed: 31318428
JACC CardioOncol. 2020 Jun;2(2):254-269
pubmed: 32313885