Amplicon Sequencing-Based Bipartite Network Analysis Confirms a High Degree of Specialization and Modularity for Fungi and Prokaryotes in Deadwood.


Journal

mSphere
ISSN: 2379-5042
Titre abrégé: mSphere
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674533

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 01 2021
Historique:
entrez: 14 1 2021
pubmed: 15 1 2021
medline: 20 8 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fungi and prokaryotes are dominant colonizers of wood and mediate its decomposition. Much progress has been achieved to unravel these communities and link them to specific wood properties. However, comparative studies considering both groups of organisms and assessing their relationships to wood resources are largely missing. Bipartite interaction networks provide an opportunity to investigate this colonizer-resource relationship more in detail and aim to directly compare results between different biotic groups. The main questions were as follows. Are network structures reflecting the trophic relationship between fungal and prokaryotic colonizers and their resources? If so, do they reflect the critical role of these groups, especially that of fungi, during decomposition? We used amplicon sequencing data to analyze fungal and prokaryotic interaction networks from deadwood of 13 temperate tree species at an early to middle stage of decomposition. Several diversity- and specialization-related indices were determined and the observed network structures were related to intrinsic wood traits. We hypothesized nonrandom bipartite networks for both groups and a higher degree of specialization for fungi, as they are the key players in wood decomposition. The results reveal highly modular and specialized interaction networks for both groups of organisms, demonstrating that many fungi and prokaryotes are resource-specific colonizers. However, as the level of specialization of fungi significantly surpassed that of prokaryotes, our findings reflect the strong association between fungi and their host. Our novel approach shows that the application of bipartite interaction networks is a useful tool to explore, quantify, and compare the deadwood-colonizers relationship based on sequencing data.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33441408
pii: 6/1/e00856-20
doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00856-20
pmc: PMC7845612
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Moll et al.

Références

ISME J. 2019 Nov;13(11):2778-2788
pubmed: 31300724
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 26;12(10):e0185056
pubmed: 29073143
AoB Plants. 2016 Jul 11;8:
pubmed: 27255514
ISME J. 2017 Oct 31;:
pubmed: 29087376
Environ Microbiol. 2018 Oct;20(10):3744-3756
pubmed: 30109768
Mol Ecol. 2016 Jul;25(13):3242-57
pubmed: 27136380
Nat Commun. 2014 Oct 20;5:5273
pubmed: 25327887
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016 Nov;92(11):
pubmed: 27559028
BMC Ecol. 2006 Aug 14;6:9
pubmed: 16907983
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2019 Feb 1;95(2):
pubmed: 30496397
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 17;8(12):e83241
pubmed: 24358265
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 12;14(4):e0214920
pubmed: 30978221
Ecol Lett. 2014 Mar;17(3):340-9
pubmed: 24354432
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004 Nov;70(5 Pt 2):056131
pubmed: 15600716
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 05;9(2):e88141
pubmed: 24505405
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 14;14(2):e0212120
pubmed: 30763365
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Dec;82(3):666-77
pubmed: 22738186
PeerJ. 2018 Dec 12;6:e6090
pubmed: 30581677
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
Science. 2012 Jun 29;336(6089):1715-9
pubmed: 22745431
Sci Rep. 2015 Apr 08;5:9456
pubmed: 25851097
Nat Commun. 2018 Aug 2;9(1):3033
pubmed: 30072764
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 May 17;284(1854):
pubmed: 28469020
AoB Plants. 2015 Jul 10;7:
pubmed: 26162897
Sci Rep. 2020 May 15;10(1):8025
pubmed: 32415174
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1611-5
pubmed: 23449999
Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):853-6
pubmed: 20705861
New Phytol. 2016 Dec;212(4):1072-1082
pubmed: 27659274
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jun 15;28(12):1647-9
pubmed: 22543367
Int Microbiol. 2005 Sep;8(3):195-204
pubmed: 16200498
Microorganisms. 2019 Nov 10;7(11):
pubmed: 31717669
Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;11(12):3166-78
pubmed: 19671076

Auteurs

Julia Moll (J)

Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle (Saale), Germany julia.moll@ufz.de anna.heintz-buschart@ufz.de.

Anna Heintz-Buschart (A)

Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle (Saale), Germany julia.moll@ufz.de anna.heintz-buschart@ufz.de.
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany.

Claus Bässler (C)

Department of Biodiversity Conservation, Institute for Ecology, Evolution and Diversity, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany.

Martin Hofrichter (M)

Department of Bio- and Environmental Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden - International Institute (IHI), Zittau, Germany.

Harald Kellner (H)

Department of Bio- and Environmental Sciences, Technische Universität Dresden - International Institute (IHI), Zittau, Germany.

François Buscot (F)

Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Halle (Saale), Germany.
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany.

Björn Hoppe (B)

Institute for National and International Plant Health, Julius Kühn-Institut, Braunschweig, Germany.

Articles similaires

Genome, Chloroplast Phylogeny Genetic Markers Base Composition High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
Populus Soil Microbiology Soil Microbiota Fungi
Coal Metagenome Phylogeny Bacteria Genome, Bacterial

Classifications MeSH