Discovering the association between the pre- and post-operative 3D spinal curve patterns in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
3D classification
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Axial rotation
Sagittal profile
Surgical outcomes
Journal
Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2021
07 2021
Historique:
received:
20
09
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
pubmed:
15
1
2021
medline:
19
11
2021
entrez:
14
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The advantage of considering the three-dimensional curve patterns, including the patterns of the vertebral position and alignment, in classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and whether such classification system relates to the surgical outcomes are not fully determined. A total of 371 AIS patients who received posterior spinal fusion surgery with 2-year follow-up were included retrospectively and consecutively. The 3D positions and orientations of the T1-L5 vertebrae were calculated from the 3D reconstructions of the spines at pre-operative and 2-year follow-up, a total of 102 variables per patient. A probabilistic clustering method was used to cluster the pre-operative and 2-year follow-up 3D spinal curve patterns separately. The distributions of the Lenke types and 3D pre-operative clusters in the post-operative clusters were determined. A total of nine pre-operative clusters including, four right thoracic types, three left thoracolumbar/lumbar types, one low apex right thoracic/thoracolumbar, and one left thoracic/right lumbar were determined. Three post-operative 3D curve patterns were Type 1 with higher residual proximal Cobb angle, Type 2 with lower T5-T12 kyphosis and highest pelvic incidence-lordosis mismatch, and Type 3 with larger lumbar curve magnitude and rotation compared to the other two groups. More than 50% of patients in each of the 3D pre-operative clusters had the same post-operative group. We developed a 3D classification of the AIS patients before and two-year after spinal fusion surgery. The link between the pre- and post-operative clusters lends itself to application of this classification system in developing predictive models of the AIS surgical outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The advantage of considering the three-dimensional curve patterns, including the patterns of the vertebral position and alignment, in classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients and whether such classification system relates to the surgical outcomes are not fully determined.
METHODS
A total of 371 AIS patients who received posterior spinal fusion surgery with 2-year follow-up were included retrospectively and consecutively. The 3D positions and orientations of the T1-L5 vertebrae were calculated from the 3D reconstructions of the spines at pre-operative and 2-year follow-up, a total of 102 variables per patient. A probabilistic clustering method was used to cluster the pre-operative and 2-year follow-up 3D spinal curve patterns separately. The distributions of the Lenke types and 3D pre-operative clusters in the post-operative clusters were determined.
RESULTS
A total of nine pre-operative clusters including, four right thoracic types, three left thoracolumbar/lumbar types, one low apex right thoracic/thoracolumbar, and one left thoracic/right lumbar were determined. Three post-operative 3D curve patterns were Type 1 with higher residual proximal Cobb angle, Type 2 with lower T5-T12 kyphosis and highest pelvic incidence-lordosis mismatch, and Type 3 with larger lumbar curve magnitude and rotation compared to the other two groups. More than 50% of patients in each of the 3D pre-operative clusters had the same post-operative group.
CONCLUSION
We developed a 3D classification of the AIS patients before and two-year after spinal fusion surgery. The link between the pre- and post-operative clusters lends itself to application of this classification system in developing predictive models of the AIS surgical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33442848
doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00276-1
pii: 10.1007/s43390-020-00276-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1053-1062Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R21 AR075971
Pays : United States
Organisme : national institute of health
ID : R21AR075971
Informations de copyright
© 2021. Scoliosis Research Society.
Références
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, Bridwell KH, Clements DH, Lowe TG, Blanke K (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1169–1181
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00006
King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, Winter RB (1983) The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1302–1313
doi: 10.2106/00004623-198365090-00012
Pasha S (2019) 3D spinal and rib cage predictors of brace effectiveness in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:384. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2754-2
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2754-2
pubmed: 31438927
pmcid: 6706918
Duong L, Mac-Thiong JM, Cheriet F, Labelle H (2009) Three-dimensional subclassification of Lenke type 1 scoliotic curves. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816845bc
doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31816845bc
pubmed: 19342936
Ferrero E, Bocahut N, Lefevre Y, Roussouly P, Pesenti S, Lakhal W, Odent T, Morin C, Clement JL, Compagnon R, de Gauzy JS, Jouve JL, Mazda K, Abelin-Genevois K, Ilharreborde B, (GES) GdEslS (2018) Proximal junctional kyphosis in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and compensatory mechanisms in a multicenter national cohort. Eur Spine J 27:2241–2250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5640-y
doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5640-y
pubmed: 29959554
Pasha S, Mac-Thiong JM (2019) Defining criteria for optimal lumbar curve correction following the selective thoracic fusion surgery in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: developing a decision tree. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-019-02596-z
doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02596-z
pubmed: 31760495
Qin X, He Z, Yin R, Qiu Y, Zhu Z (2020) Selecting the last substantially touching vertebra as lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 2A-R and 2A-L curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 45:309–318. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003254
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003254
Skaggs DL, Seehausen DA, Yamaguchi KT, Hah RJ, Wright ML, Bumpass DB, Kim HJ, Andras LM, Vitale MG, Lenke LG (2016) Assessment of lowest instrumented vertebra tilt on radiographic measurements in Lenke “C” modifier curves undergoing selective thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 4:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.08.006
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.08.006
pubmed: 27927544
Lonner BS, Ren Y, Newton PO, Shah SA, Samdani AF, Shufflebarger HL, Asghar J, Sponseller P, Betz RR, Yaszay B (2017) Risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis-the pelvis and other considerations. Spine Deform 5:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2016.10.003
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.10.003
pubmed: 28449961
Crawford CH, Lenke LG, Sucato DJ, Richards BS, Emans JB, Vitale MG, Erickson MA, Sanders JO (2013) Selective thoracic fusion in Lenke 1C curves: prevalence and criteria. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1380–1385. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182987360
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182987360
Lenke LG, Betz RR, Haher TR, Lapp MA, Merola AA, Harms J, Shufflebarger HL (2001) Multisurgeon assessment of surgical decision-making in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: curve classification, operative approach, and fusion levels. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:2347–2353
doi: 10.1097/00007632-200111010-00011
Homans JF, Kruyt MC, Schlösser TPC, Colo D, Rogers K, Shah SA, Flynn JM, Castelein RM, Pasha S (2020) Changes in the position of the junctional vertebrae after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: implication in risk assessment of proximal junctional kyphosis development. J Pediatr Orthop 40:e84–e90. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001400
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001400
pubmed: 31095012
Schulz J, Asghar J, Bastrom T, Shufflebarger H, Newton PO, Sturm P, Betz RR, Samdani AF, Yaszay B, Group HS (2014) Optimal radiographical criteria after selective thoracic fusion for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a C lumbar modifier: does adherence to current guidelines predict success? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:E1368-1373. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000580
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000580
Pasha S, Cahill PJ, Flynn JM, Sponseller P, Newton PO, Group aHS (2018) Relationships between the axial derotation of the lower instrumented vertebra and uninstrumented lumbar curve correction: radiographic outcome in Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Pediatr Orthop 38:e194–e201. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001136
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001136
pubmed: 29360660
Chang KW, Leng X, Zhao W, Chen YY, Chen TC, Chang KI (2011) Broader curve criteria for selective thoracic fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:1658–1664. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318215fa73
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318215fa73
Pasha S, Baldwin K (2019) Surgical outcome differences between the 3D subtypes of right thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06145-4
doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06145-4
pubmed: 31552536
Cho RH, Yaszay B, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Newton PO (2012) Which Lenke 1A curves are at the greatest risk for adding-on... and why? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1384–1390. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824bac7a
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824bac7a
Sangole AP, Aubin CE, Labelle H, Stokes IA, Lenke LG, Jackson R, Newton P (2009) Three-dimensional classification of thoracic scoliotic curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:91–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181877bbb
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181877bbb
Shen J, Kadoury S, Labelle H, Parent S (2016) Geometric torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a surgical outcomes study of Lenke type 1 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41:1903–1907. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001651
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001651
Pasha S, Hassanzadeh P, Ecker M, Ho V (2019) A hierarchical classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: identifying the distinguishing features in 3D spinal deformities. PLoS ONE 14:e0213406. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213406
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213406
pubmed: 30893327
pmcid: 6426223
Pasha S, Flynn J (2018) Data-driven classification of the 3D spinal curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with an applications in surgical outcome prediction. Sci Rep 8:16296. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34261-6
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34261-6
pubmed: 30389972
pmcid: 6214965
Kadoury S, Shen J, Parent S (2014) Global geometric torsion estimation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Med Biol Eng Comput 52:309–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1132-8
doi: 10.1007/s11517-013-1132-8
pubmed: 24370854
Louer C, Yaszay B, Cross M, Bartley CE, Bastrom TP, Shah SA, Lonner B, Cahill PJ, Samdani A, Upasani VV, Newton PO (2019) Ten-year outcomes of selective fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 101:761–770. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01013
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01013
pubmed: 31045663
Pasha S, Cahill PJ, Dormans JP, Flynn JM (2016) Characterizing the differences between the 2D and 3D measurements of spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 25:3137–3145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4582-5
doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4582-5
pubmed: 27146809
Pasha S, Schlösser T, Zhu X, Castelein R, Flynn J (2019) Application of low-dose stereoradiography in in vivo vertebral morphologic measurements: comparison with computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop 39:487–494. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000001043
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001043
pubmed: 31503238
Pasha S (2019) 3D deformation patterns of s shaped elastic rods as a pathogenesis model for spinal deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Sci Rep 9:1
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53068-7
Stokes IA, Sangole AP, Aubin CE (2009) Classification of scoliosis deformity three-dimensional spinal shape by cluster analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:584–590. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318190b914
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318190b914
Shen J, Parent S, Wu J, Aubin C, Mac-Thiong JM, Kadoury S, Newton P, Lenke LG, Lafage V, Barchi S, Labelle H (2020) Towards a new 3D classification for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-020-00051-2
doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00051-2
pubmed: 32705449
Arginteanu T, DeTurck D, Pasha S (2020) Application of Călugăreanu–white–fuller theorem in classification of pediatric spinal deformity. Med Biol Eng Comput 58:2963
doi: 10.1007/s11517-020-02259-w
DeFrancesco CJ, Pasha S, Miller DJ, Betz RR, Clements DH, Fletcher ND, Glotzbecker MG, Hwang SW, Kelly MP, Lehman RA, Lonner BS, Newton PO, Roye BD, Sponseller PD, Upasani VV, Cahill PJ, Group HS (2018) Agreement between manual and computerized designation of neutral vertebra in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 6:644–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.03.001
pubmed: 30348338
Pasha S, Ho-Fung V, Ecker M, Nossov S, Francavilla M (2020) Three-dimensional classification of the Lenke 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using coronal and lateral spinal radiographs: a validation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 21:1
doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03798-x
Alam M, Newton PO, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP, Group HS (2013) Are thoracic curves with a low apex (T11 or T11/T12) really thoracic curves? Spine Deform 1:139–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2012.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2012.12.004
pubmed: 27927430
Pasha S, Shah S, Newton P (2020) Machine learning predicts the 3D outcomes of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery using patient-surgeon specific parameters. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003795
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003795