Patch Testing With Carmine 2.5% in Petrolatum by the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 2011-2012.


Journal

Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug
ISSN: 2162-5220
Titre abrégé: Dermatitis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101207335

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed: 15 1 2021
medline: 5 11 2021
entrez: 14 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Carmine is a natural red dye that may cause allergic contact dermatitis. The aim of this study was to analyze patch test reactions to carmine (2.5% in petrolatum) and characterize carmine-positive patients. This study conducted a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data compiled between 2011 and 2012. Of 4240 patients patch tested to carmine, 132 (3.1%) had reactions with a final interpretation of "allergic" (positive). Carmine-positive patients were significantly more likely to be female (77.7% vs 68.3%; P = 0.0237) and have a final primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (74.8% vs 47.2%; P < 0.0001). As compared with carmine-negative patients, carmine-positive patients were significantly more likely to have involvement of all facial sites combined (48.1% vs 29.9%; P < 0.0001) and the lips (7.6% vs 3.6%; P = 0.0166). At final reading, most carmine reactions were weak (+; 64.9%). Approximately half (53.4%) were currently clinically relevant; identified sources were primarily personal care products (77.1%), especially makeup (31.4%) and lip products (8.6%). Weak patch test reactions to carmine should be interpreted with caution. Allergic contact dermatitis to carmine should be suspected in women with facial and/or lip dermatitis, especially those using carmine-containing cosmetics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Carmine is a natural red dye that may cause allergic contact dermatitis.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to analyze patch test reactions to carmine (2.5% in petrolatum) and characterize carmine-positive patients.
METHODS METHODS
This study conducted a retrospective analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group data compiled between 2011 and 2012.
RESULTS RESULTS
Of 4240 patients patch tested to carmine, 132 (3.1%) had reactions with a final interpretation of "allergic" (positive). Carmine-positive patients were significantly more likely to be female (77.7% vs 68.3%; P = 0.0237) and have a final primary diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis (74.8% vs 47.2%; P < 0.0001). As compared with carmine-negative patients, carmine-positive patients were significantly more likely to have involvement of all facial sites combined (48.1% vs 29.9%; P < 0.0001) and the lips (7.6% vs 3.6%; P = 0.0166). At final reading, most carmine reactions were weak (+; 64.9%). Approximately half (53.4%) were currently clinically relevant; identified sources were primarily personal care products (77.1%), especially makeup (31.4%) and lip products (8.6%).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Weak patch test reactions to carmine should be interpreted with caution. Allergic contact dermatitis to carmine should be suspected in women with facial and/or lip dermatitis, especially those using carmine-containing cosmetics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33443377
doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000643
pii: 01206501-900000000-99516
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0
Coloring Agents 0
Cosmetics 0
Petrolatum 8009-03-8
Carmine CID8Z8N95N

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

94-100

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.

Références

National Center for Biotechnology Information. Carmine, CID=14950. PubChem database. Available at: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Carmine. Accessed April 23, 2020.
de Groot AC. Monographs of chemicals and substances in cosmetics that have caused allergic contact dermatitis (CI 75470). In: Monographs in Contact Allergy. Volume 1, Part I. Non-Fragrance Allergens in Cosmetics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2017:294–296.
Dapson R. The history, chemistry and modes of action of carmine and related dyes. Biotech Histochem 2007;82(4–5):173–187.
Portillo MI, Vigueras AL. A review on the cochineal species in Mexico, hosts and natural enemies. Acta Hortic 2006;(728):249–256.
Greenhawt MJ, Baldwin JL. Carmine dye and cochineal extract: hidden allergens no more. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009;103(1):73–75.
Borges ME, Tejera RL, Díaz L, et al. Natural dyes extraction from cochineal (Dactylopius coccus). New extraction methods. Food Chem 2012;132(4):1855–1860.
Shaw DW. Allergic contact dermatitis from carmine. Dermatitis 2009;20(5):292–295.
Rundle CW, Jacob SE, Machler BC. Carmine update. Dermatologist 2018;26(6). Available at: https://www.the-dermatologist.com/article/carmine-update. Accessed April 1, 2020.
US Food and Drug Administration. Small entity compliance guide: declaration by name on the label of all foods and cosmetic products that contain cochineal extract and carmine. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/small-entity-compliance-guide-declaration-name-label-all-foods-and-cosmetic-products-contain. Accessed March 31, 2020.
Brown SR, Baraza W, Din S, et al. Chromoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for the detection of polyps in the colon and rectum. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;4:CD006439.
Luketic L, Murji A. Options to evaluate ureter patency at cystoscopy in a world without indigo carmine. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23(6):878–885.
Rundle CW, Jacob SE, Machler BC. Contact dermatitis to carmine. Dermatitis 2018;29(5):244–249.
Kimber I, Dearman RJ. Chemical respiratory allergens and the contact urticaria syndrome. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI eds. Contact Urticaria Syndrome. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1997:45–53.
Faghri de la Feld S, Helms SE. Food additives and dyes. In: Fowler JF, Zirwas MJ, eds. Fisher's Contact Dermatitis. Phoenix, AZ: Contact Dermatitis Institute; 2019:507–540.
Sarkany I, Meara R, Everall J. Cheilitis due to carmine in lip salve. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 1961;46:39–40.
Yamamoto A, Kono T, Kato A, et al. Contact dermatitis due to cochineal carmine. Environ Dermatol 1999;6(3):185–189.
Endo Y, Onozawa N, Tamura A, et al. Positive patch test reaction to carmine in lipstick. Environ Dermatol 2003;10:75–78.
Suzuki K, Hirokawa K, Yagami A, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis from carmine in cosmetic blush. Dermatitis 2011;22(6):348–349.
Ferris GJ, Wat M, Nedorost S. Multifactorial dermatitis with probable systemic contact dermatitis to carmine. Dermatitis 2017;28(4):293–294.
Machler BC, Jacob SE. Carmine red: a potentially overlooked allergen in children. Dermatitis 2018;29(2):92–93.
Ohgiya Y, Arakawa F, Akiyama H, et al. Molecular cloning, expression, and characterization of a major 38-kD cochineal allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;123(5):1157–1162.e4.
Warshaw EM, Maibach HI, Taylor JS, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 2011–2012. Dermatitis 2015;26(1):49–59.
DeKoven JG, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2013–2014. Dermatitis 2017;28(1):33–46.
Schnuch A, Geier J, Uter W, et al. National rates and regional differences in sensitization to allergens of the standard series. Contact Dermatitis 1997;37(5):200–209.
Zug KA, Pham AK, Belsito DV, et al. Patch testing in children from 2005 to 2012. Dermatitis 2014;25(6):345–355.
Catli G, Bostanci I, Ozmen S, et al. Is patch testing with food additives useful in children with atopic eczema? Pediatr Dermatol 2015;32(5):684–689.
Yu J, Atwater AR, Brod B, et al. Pediatric baseline patch test series. Dermatitis 2018;29(4):206–212.
Environmental Working Group. Products Containing Carmine. Available at: https://www.ewg.org/skindeep/browse/ingredients/701120-CARMINE/. Accessed April 3, 2020.
US Food and Drug Administration. Title 21—food and drugs chapter I—Food and Drug Administration Department of Health and Human Services subchapter G—cosmetics. Code of Federal Regulations. (volume 7). Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=701.3. Accessed April 1, 2020.
Rubin CB, Brod B. Natural does not mean safe—the dirt on clean beauty products [published online September 25, 2019]. JAMA Dermatol 2019. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.2724.
Kelly C. Starbucks and the great beetle extract controversy. The Washington Post. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/all-we-can-eat/post/starbucks-and-the-great-beetle-extract-controversy/2012/03/30/gIQA7QAylS_blog.html. Accessed April 2, 2020.
Cheng A. Why you should care about vegan beauty. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/26/style/why-you-should-care-about-vegan-beauty.html. Accessed April 2, 2020.
What vegans need to know about carmine. Ethical Elephant. Available at: https://ethicalelephant.com/carmine-vegan/. Accessed April 3, 2020.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Makeup enthusiasts: stop smearing dead bugs on your face. Available at: https://www.peta.org/living/personal-care-fashion/carmine-makeup/ Accessed April 1, 2020.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals. You may be putting vomit and crushed beetles on your face. Available at: https://www.peta.org/living/personal-care-fashion/may-putting-vomit-crushed-beetles-face/. Accessed April 1, 2020.
Miyakawa M, Inomata N, Sagawa N, et al. Anaphylaxis due to carmine-containing foods induced by epicutaneous sensitization to red eye-liner. J Dermatol 2017;44(1):96–97.
Greenhawt M, McMorris M, Baldwin J. Carmine hypersensitivity masquerading as azithromycin hypersensitivity. Allergy Asthma Proc 2009;30(1):95–101.
Kagi M. Campari-orange anaphylaxis due to carmine allergy. Lancet 1994;344(8914):60–61.
Wüthrich B, Kägi MK, Stücker W. Anaphylactic reactions to ingested carmine (E120). Allergy 1997;52(11):1133–1137.
Yamakawa Y, Oosuna H, Yamakawa T, et al. Cochineal extract–induced immediate allergy. J Dermatol 2009;36(1):72–74.
Beaudouin E, Kanny G, Lambert H, et al. Food anaphylaxis following ingestion of carmine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995;74(5):427–430.
Chung K, Baker JR, Baldwin JL, et al. Identification of carmine allergens among three carmine allergy patients. Allergy 2001;56(1):73–77.
Baldwin JL, Chou AH, Solomon WR. Popsicle-induced anaphylaxis due to carmine dye allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1997;79(5):415–419.
Añíbarro B, Seoane J, Vila C, et al. Occupational asthma induced by inhaled carmine among butchers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2003;16(2):133–137. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12926405.
Ferrer Ð, Marco FM, Andreu C, et al. Occupational asthma to carmine in a butcher. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2005;138(3):243–250.
Quirce S, Cuevas M, Olaguibel J, et al. Occupational asthma and immunologic responses induced by inhaled carmine among employees at a factory making natural dyes. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1994;93(1):44–52.
Acero S, Tabar AI, Alvarez MJ, et al. Occupational asthma and food allergy due to carmine. Allergy 1998;53(9):897–901.

Auteurs

Joel G DeKoven (JG)

Division of Dermatology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

James S Taylor (JS)

Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, OH.

Amber R Atwater (AR)

Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Margo J Reeder (MJ)

Department of Dermatology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison.

Jonathan I Silverberg (JI)

Department of Dermatology, The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

Howard I Maibach (HI)

Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco.

Kathryn A Zug (KA)

Department of Dermatology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

Denis Sasseville (D)

Division of Dermatology, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.

Joseph F Fowler (JF)

Division of Dermatology, University of Louisville, KY.

Melanie D Pratt (MD)

Division of Dermatology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Anthony F Fransway (AF)

Associates in Dermatology, Fort Myers, FL.

Donald V Belsito (DV)

Department of Dermatology, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Vincent A DeLeo (VA)

Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH