The Case for Biocalculus: Improving Student Understanding of the Utility Value of Mathematics to Biology and Affect toward Mathematics.
Journal
CBE life sciences education
ISSN: 1931-7913
Titre abrégé: CBE Life Sci Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101269039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
entrez:
14
1
2021
pubmed:
15
1
2021
medline:
27
4
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The next generation of life science professionals will require far more quantitative skills than prior generations. Calculus is important for understanding dynamical systems in biology and, therefore, is often a required course for life science students. However, many life science students do not understand the utility value of mathematics to biology. Therefore, according to expectancy-value theory, life science students may experience lower motivation, which can impact their performance in a calculus course. This study examines how two different biocalculus courses, which integrated calculus and biological concepts and successfully halved the rates of students earning a D, F, or withdrawing (DFW), affected life science students' utility value, interest, and overall attitudes toward mathematics. Using pre and post surveys, we found that students' interest in mathematics increased by the end of the semester, and they demonstrated a more sophisticated understanding of how mathematics is used in biology. Students whose attitudes toward mathematics improved primarily attributed these changes to a better understanding of the utility of mathematics to biology, feelings of competence in mathematics, or rapport with the instructor. Thus, communicating the utility value of mathematics to biology through integrated mathematics-biology courses can contribute to improved attitudes toward mathematics that can impact students' motivation and performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33444110
doi: 10.1187/cbe.20-06-0124
pmc: PMC8108491
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
ar5Références
Science. 2009 Dec 4;326(5958):1410-2
pubmed: 19965759
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2018 Sep;17(3):rm2
pubmed: 30142053
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2014 Dec;82(6):1219-27
pubmed: 25090041
J Educ Psychol. 2018 Aug;110(6):834-849
pubmed: 30294006
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Fall;9(3):277-83
pubmed: 20810959
Motiv Sci. 2015 Mar 1;1(1):47-71
pubmed: 26495326
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Jun 1;12(2):187-205
pubmed: 23737627
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Fall;9(3):201-11
pubmed: 20810952
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2010 Fall;9(3):290-7
pubmed: 20810961
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2018 Jul 31;19(2):
pubmed: 30100952
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):70-83
pubmed: 16420119
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):745-765
pubmed: 26524001
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):13018
pubmed: 31506498
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 12;12(6):e0179559
pubmed: 28604813
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2000 Jan;25(1):68-81
pubmed: 10620382
Am Nat. 2006 Mar;167(3):410-28
pubmed: 16673349
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2):
pubmed: 28450445
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Summer;15(2):
pubmed: 27146161