Prolactin receptor-driven combined luminal and epithelial differentiation in breast cancer restricts plasticity, stemness, tumorigenesis and metastasis.
Journal
Oncogenesis
ISSN: 2157-9024
Titre abrégé: Oncogenesis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101580004
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jan 2021
14 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
27
07
2020
accepted:
11
12
2020
revised:
09
12
2020
entrez:
15
1
2021
pubmed:
16
1
2021
medline:
16
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dedifferentiation increased cellular plasticity and stemness are established derivers of tumor heterogeneity, metastasis and therapeutic failure resulting in incurable cancers. Therefore, it is essential to decipher pro/forward-differentiation mechanisms in cancer that may serve as therapeutic targets. We found that interfering with expression of the receptor for the lactogenic hormone prolactin (PRLR) in breast cancer cells representative of the luminal and epithelial breast cancer subtypes (hormone receptor positive (HR+) and HER2-enriched (HER2-E) resulted in loss of their differentiation state, enriched for stem-like cell subpopulations, and increased their tumorigenic capacity in a subtype-specific manner. Loss of PRLR expression in HR+ breast cancer cells caused their dedifferentiation generating a mesenchymal-basal-like phenotype enriched in CD44+ breast cancer stem-like cells (BCSCs) showing high tumorigenic and metastatic capacities and resistance to anti-hormonal therapy. Whereas loss of PRLR expression in HER2-E breast cancer cells resulted in loss of their luminal differentiation yet enriched for epithelial ALDH+ BCSC population showing elevated HER2-driven tumorigenic, multi-organ metastatic spread, and resistance to anti-HER2 therapy. Collectively, this study defines PRLR as a driver of precise luminal and epithelial differentiation limiting cellular plasticity, stemness, and tumorigenesis and emphasizing the function of pro/forward-differentiation pathways as a foundation for the discovery of anti-cancer therapeutic targets.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33446633
doi: 10.1038/s41389-020-00297-5
pii: 10.1038/s41389-020-00297-5
pmc: PMC7809050
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
10Références
Fitzmaurice, C. et al. Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol. 3, 524–548 (2017).
pubmed: 27918777
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
Ginsburg, O. et al. The global burden of women’s cancers: a grand challenge in global health. Lancet Oncol. 389, 847–860 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31392-7
Anderson, R. L. et al. A framework for the development of effective anti-metastatic agents. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 16, 185–204 (2019).
pubmed: 30514977
doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0134-8
Kalinowski, L., Saunus, J. M., Reed, A. E. M. & Lakhani, S. R. in Breast Cancer Metastasis and Drug Resistance 75–104 (Springer, 2019).
Gupta, P. B., Pastushenko, I., Skibinski, A., Blanpain, C. & Kuperwasser, C. Phenotypic plasticity: driver of cancer initiation, progression, and therapy resistance. Cell Stem Cell 24, 65–78 (2019).
Pece, S. et al. Biological and molecular heterogeneity of breast cancers correlates with their cancer stem cell content. Cell 140, 62–73 (2010).
pubmed: 20074520
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.007
Meacham, C. E. & Morrison, S. J. J. N. Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 501, 328 (2013).
pubmed: 24048065
pmcid: 4521623
doi: 10.1038/nature12624
Sachs, L. Control of normal cell differentiation and the phenotypic reversion of malignancy in myeloid leukaemia. Nature 274, 535 (1978).
pubmed: 307692
doi: 10.1038/274535a0
Leszczyniecka, M., Roberts, T., Dent, P., Grant, S. & Fisher, P. B. Differentiation therapy of human cancer: basic science and clinical applications. Pharmacol. Therap. 90, 105–156 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(01)00132-2
Lo-Coco, F. et al. Retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide for acute promyelocytic leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 111–121 (2013).
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300874
pubmed: 23841729
Beug, H. J. C. Breast cancer stem cells: eradication by differentiation therapy? Cell 138, 623–625 (2009).
pubmed: 19703390
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.007
de Thé, H. Differentiation therapy revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18, 117 (2018).
pubmed: 29192213
doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.103
Hennighausen, L. & Robinson, G. W. Information networks in the mammary gland. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 715 (2005).
pubmed: 16231422
doi: 10.1038/nrm1714
Akers, R. M. A 100-year review: mammary development and lactation. J. dairy Sci. 100, 10332–10352 (2017).
pubmed: 29153168
doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12983
Saleem, M., Martin, H. & Coates, P. Prolactin biology and laboratory measurement: an update on physiology and current analytical issues. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 39, 3 (2018).
pubmed: 30072818
pmcid: 6069739
Vonderhaar, B. K. Prolactin involvement in breast cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 6, 389–404 (1999).
pubmed: 10516853
doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0060389
Ben-Jonathan, N., Liby, K., McFarland, M. & Zinger, M. Prolactin as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor in human cancer. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 13, 245–250 (2002).
pubmed: 12128285
doi: 10.1016/S1043-2760(02)00603-3
Carver, K. C., Arendt, L. M. & Schuler, L. A. Complex prolactin crosstalk in breast cancer: new therapeutic implications. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 307, 1–7 (2009).
pubmed: 19524120
pmcid: 3190192
doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2009.03.014
Agarwal, N. et al. Phase I study of the prolactin receptor antagonist LFA102 in metastatic breast and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Oncologist 21, 535–536i (2016).
pubmed: 27091421
pmcid: 4861370
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0502
O’Sullivan, C. C. & Bates, S. E. Targeting prolactin receptor (PRLR) signaling in PRLR-positive breast and prostate cancer. Oncologist 21, 523–526 (2016).
pubmed: 27107001
pmcid: 4861375
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0108
Nouhi, Z. et al. Defining the role of prolactin as an invasion suppressor hormone in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66, 1824–1832 (2006).
pubmed: 16452244
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2292
Moamer, A. et al. A role for kinesin-1 subunits KIF5B/KLC1 in regulating epithelial mesenchymal plasticity in breast tumorigenesis. EBioMedicine 45, 92–107 (2019).
pubmed: 31204277
pmcid: 6642081
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.06.009
Lopez-Ozuna, V. M., Hachim, I. Y., Hachim, M. Y., Lebrun, J. J. & Ali, S. Prolactin pro-differentiation pathway in triple negative breast cancer: impact on prognosis and potential therapy. Sci. Rep. 6, 30934 (2016).
pubmed: 27480353
pmcid: 4969612
doi: 10.1038/srep30934
Manhes, C. et al. Local over-expression of prolactin in differentiating mouse mammary gland induces functional defects and benign lesions, but no carcinoma. J. Endocrinol. 190, 271–285 (2006).
pubmed: 16899561
doi: 10.1677/joe.1.06829
Nitze, L. M. et al. Reevaluation of the proposed autocrine proliferative function of prolactin in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 142, 31–44 (2013).
pubmed: 24146212
pmcid: 3825490
doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2731-7
López-Ozuna, V. M., Hachim, I. Y., Hachim, M. Y., Lebrun, J.-J. & Ali, S. Prolactin modulates TNBC aggressive phenotype limiting tumorigenesis. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 26, 321–337 (2019).
Hachim, I. Y., Lopez-Ozuna, V. M., Hachim, M. Y., Lebrun, J. J. & Ali, S. Prolactin hormone exerts anti-tumorigenic effects in HER-2 overexpressing breast cancer cells through regulation of stemness. Stem Cell Res. 40, 101538 (2019).
pubmed: 31450192
doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101538
Galsgaard, E. D. et al. Re-evaluation of the prolactin receptor expression in human breast cancer. J. Endocrinol. 201, 115–128 (2009).
pubmed: 19153125
doi: 10.1677/JOE-08-0479
Faupel-Badger, J. M. et al. Prolactin receptor expression and breast cancer: relationships with tumor characteristics among pre- and post-menopausal women in a population-based case-control study from Poland. Hormones Cancer 5, 42–50 (2014).
pubmed: 24249584
doi: 10.1007/s12672-013-0165-7
Hachim, I. Y., Hachim, M. Y., Lopez, V. M., Lebrun, J. J. & Ali, S. Prolactin receptor expression is an Independent favorable prognostic marker in human breast cancer. Appl. Immunohistochem. Mol. Morphol. 24, 238–245 (2016).
pubmed: 26317306
doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000178
Hachim, I. Y., Shams, A., Lebrun, J. J. & Ali, S. A Favorable role of prolactin in human breast cancer reveals novel pathway based gene signatures indicative of tumor differentiation and favorable patient outcome: prolactin-induced mammary differentiation program in breast cancer prognosis. Hum. Pathol., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2016.02.010 (2016).
Prat, A. & Perou, C. M. Mammary development meets cancer genomics. Nat. Med. 15, 842 (2009).
pubmed: 19661985
doi: 10.1038/nm0809-842
Guiu, S. et al. Molecular subclasses of breast cancer: how do we define them? The IMPAKT 2012 Working Group Statement. Ann. Oncol. 23, 2997–3006 (2012).
pubmed: 23166150
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds586
Bole-Feysot, C., Goffin, V., Edery, M., Binart, N. & Kelly, P. A. J. Er Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr. Rev. 19, 225–268 (1998).
pubmed: 9626554
doi: 10.1210/edrv.19.3.0334
D’Amato, V. et al. Mechanisms of lapatinib resistance in HER2-driven breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev. 41, 877–883 (2015).
pubmed: 26276735
doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.08.001
Charafe-Jauffret, E. et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1-positive cancer stem cells mediate metastasis and poor clinical outcome in inflammatory breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 45–55 (2010).
pubmed: 20028757
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1630
Charafe-Jauffret, E. et al. Breast cancer cell lines contain functional cancer stem cells with metastatic capacity and a distinct molecular signature. Cancer Res. 69, 1302–1313 (2009).
pubmed: 19190339
pmcid: 2819227
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2741
Ginestier, C. et al. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell 1, 555–567 (2007).
pubmed: 18371393
pmcid: 2423808
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014
Rodriguez-Torres, M. & Allan, A. L. Aldehyde dehydrogenase as a marker and functional mediator of metastasis in solid tumors. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 33, 97–113 (2016).
pubmed: 26445849
doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9755-9
Croker, A. K. & Allan, A. L. Inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity reduces chemotherapy and radiation resistance of stem-like ALDH hi CD44+ human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 133, 75–87 (2012).
pubmed: 21818590
doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1692-y
Comşa, Ş., Cimpean, A. M. & Raica, M. The story of MCF-7 breast cancer cell line: 40 years of experience in research. Anticancer Res. 35, 3147–3154 (2015).
pubmed: 26026074
Klos, K. S. et al. ErbB2 increases vascular endothelial growth factor protein synthesis via activation of mammalian target of rapamycin/p70S6K leading to increased angiogenesis and spontaneous metastasis of human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66, 2028–2037 (2006).
pubmed: 16489002
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4559
Neve, R. M. et al. A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. Cancer Cell 10, 515–527 (2006).
pubmed: 17157791
pmcid: 2730521
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.10.008
Liu, X. et al. Somatic loss of BRCA1 and p53 in mice induces mammary tumors with features of human BRCA1-mutated basal-like breast cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12111–12116 (2007).
pubmed: 17626182
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702969104
pmcid: 1924557
Olsson, H. Cell of origin of breast cancer: an updated hypothesis merging epidemiological data with molecular biology. J. Carcinog. Mutagen. 4, 139 (2013).
doi: 10.4172/2157-2518.1000139
Molyneux, G. et al. BRCA1 basal-like breast cancers originate from luminal epithelial progenitors and not from basal stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 7, 403–417 (2010).
pubmed: 20804975
doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2010.07.010
Honeth, G. et al. The CD44+/CD24-phenotype is enriched in basal-like breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R53 (2008).
pubmed: 18559090
pmcid: 2481503
doi: 10.1186/bcr2108
Wright, M. H. et al. Brca1 breast tumors contain distinct CD44+/CD24- and CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics. Breast Cancer Res. 10, R10 (2008).
pubmed: 18241344
pmcid: 2374965
doi: 10.1186/bcr1855
Jones, R. A. et al. RB1 deficiency in triple-negative breast cancer induces mitochondrial protein translation. J. Clin. Investig. 126, 3739–3757 (2016).
pubmed: 27571409
doi: 10.1172/JCI81568
pmcid: 5096803
Korkaya, H., Paulson, A., Iovino, F. & Wicha, M. S. J. O. HER2 regulates the mammary stem/progenitor cell population driving tumorigenesis and invasion. Oncogene 27, 6120 (2008).
pubmed: 18591932
pmcid: 2602947
doi: 10.1038/onc.2008.207
Borcherding, N. et al. Re-evaluating E-Cadherin and β-catenin: a pan-cancer proteomic approach with an emphasis on breast cancer. Am. J. Pathol. 188, 1910–1920 (2018).
pubmed: 29879416
pmcid: 6119824
doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.05.003
Aceto, N. et al. Circulating tumor cell clusters are oligoclonal precursors of breast cancer metastasis. Cell 158, 1110–1122 (2014).
pubmed: 25171411
pmcid: 4149753
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.013
Campbell, K. & Casanova, J. J. Nc A role for E-cadherin in ensuring cohesive migration of a heterogeneous population of non-epithelial cells. Nat. Commun. 6, 7998 (2015).
pubmed: 26272476
doi: 10.1038/ncomms8998
Fulga, V. et al. Differential expression of E-cadherin in primary breast cancer and corresponding lymph node metastases. Anticancer Res. 35, 759–765 (2015).
pubmed: 25667455
Hollestelle, A. et al. Loss of E-cadherin is not a necessity for epithelial to mesenchymal transition in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 138, 47–57 (2013).
pubmed: 23338761
doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2415-3
Jolly, M. K., Mani, S. A. & Levine, H. Hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype (s): the ‘fittest’for metastasis? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1870, 151–157 (2018).
Cejalvo, J. M. et al. Intrinsic subtypes and gene expression profiles in primary and metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 77, 2213–2221 (2017).
pubmed: 28249905
pmcid: 5822682
doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2717
Lluch, A. et al. Dynamic clonal remodelling in breast cancer metastases is associated with subtype conversion. Eur. J. Cancer 120, 54–64 (2019).
pubmed: 31491604
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.003
Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O. & Zhang, F. Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783 (2014).
pubmed: 25075903
pmcid: 4486245
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3047
Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
pubmed: 24336571
doi: 10.1126/science.1247005
Tashima, R. et al. Evaluation of an optimal cut-off point for the Ki-67 index as a prognostic factor in primary breast cancer: a retrospective study. PLoS ONE 10, e0119565 (2015).
pubmed: 26177501
pmcid: 4503758
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119565
Colpaert, C. et al. Inflammatory breast cancer shows angiogenesis with high endothelial proliferation rate and strong E-cadherin expression. Br. J. Cancer 88, 718 (2003).
pubmed: 12618881
pmcid: 2376338
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600807
Khramtsov, A. I. et al. Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is enriched in basal-like breast cancers and predicts poor outcome. Am. J. Pathol. 176, 2911–2920 (2010).
pubmed: 20395444
pmcid: 2877852
doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.091125
Johnson, S., Chen, H. & Lo, P.-K. In vitro tumorsphere formation assays. Bio Protoc. 3, e325 (2013).
pubmed: 27500184
doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.325