Use of advanced statistical techniques to predict all-cause mortality in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.
Hypertension
Mortality
SPRINT
U curves
Journal
International Journal of Cardiology. Hypertension
ISSN: 2590-0862
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol Hypertens
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101773659
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
revised:
11
09
2020
accepted:
17
09
2020
entrez:
15
1
2021
pubmed:
16
1
2021
medline:
16
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was conducted in patients with hypertension and additional risk for cardiovascular disease who were randomized to the intensive blood pressure group targeting systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 120 mm Hg and to the standard group where the target was less than 140 mm Hg. Analyses were done in the matched group of participants with the same gender, same age (±2 years) and same SBP (±3 mm Hg) at three months of treatment regardless of initial randomization to intensive or standard group (shaded area in Figure 1). During 3.26 years of follow-up, intensive group participants had 14.8 mm Hg lower SBP and received on average one more (2.8 vs. 1.8) blood pressure lowering medications. This was associated with lower all-cause mortality in the intensive treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.90, p = 0.003). The effect on SBP was achieved at 3 months and remained unchanged thereafter. This paper addresses two questions with respect to all-cause mortality in SPRINT in the matched set. 1) What is the effect of receiving more than one drug on all-cause mortality. Conditional logistic regression for all-cause mortality with respect to number of drugs indicated that during the 3.26 years of follow-up persons who received more than one drug were more likely to die (coefficient = 0.5039, OR = 1.6552, p = 0.0322) than patients who received one drug. 2) Was there a U curve relationship between on treatment SBP and all-cause mortality? A U curve fitting a quadratic equation (parabola) of SBP and all-cause death was observed. This was seen in the patients randomized to the standard target group in unadjusted analyses as well as in analyses adjusted for demographics or all covariates (p < 0.001 for all). The U curves in the combined group and the intensive treatment group were less pronounced. SPRINT participants who were matched for gender, age, and SBP at 3 months, and received more than one drug had higher all-cause mortality during the 3.26 years of follow-up. Those who were randomized to standard treatment target had a U curve relationship between SBP at three months and all-cause mortality. The U curves in the combined group and the intensive treatment group were less pronounced.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was conducted in patients with hypertension and additional risk for cardiovascular disease who were randomized to the intensive blood pressure group targeting systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 120 mm Hg and to the standard group where the target was less than 140 mm Hg. Analyses were done in the matched group of participants with the same gender, same age (±2 years) and same SBP (±3 mm Hg) at three months of treatment regardless of initial randomization to intensive or standard group (shaded area in Figure 1).
METHODS AND RESULTS
RESULTS
During 3.26 years of follow-up, intensive group participants had 14.8 mm Hg lower SBP and received on average one more (2.8 vs. 1.8) blood pressure lowering medications. This was associated with lower all-cause mortality in the intensive treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.90, p = 0.003). The effect on SBP was achieved at 3 months and remained unchanged thereafter. This paper addresses two questions with respect to all-cause mortality in SPRINT in the matched set. 1) What is the effect of receiving more than one drug on all-cause mortality. Conditional logistic regression for all-cause mortality with respect to number of drugs indicated that during the 3.26 years of follow-up persons who received more than one drug were more likely to die (coefficient = 0.5039, OR = 1.6552, p = 0.0322) than patients who received one drug. 2) Was there a U curve relationship between on treatment SBP and all-cause mortality? A U curve fitting a quadratic equation (parabola) of SBP and all-cause death was observed. This was seen in the patients randomized to the standard target group in unadjusted analyses as well as in analyses adjusted for demographics or all covariates (p < 0.001 for all). The U curves in the combined group and the intensive treatment group were less pronounced.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
SPRINT participants who were matched for gender, age, and SBP at 3 months, and received more than one drug had higher all-cause mortality during the 3.26 years of follow-up. Those who were randomized to standard treatment target had a U curve relationship between SBP at three months and all-cause mortality. The U curves in the combined group and the intensive treatment group were less pronounced.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33447775
doi: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100053
pii: S2590-0862(20)30030-6
pmc: PMC7803049
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100053Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
JAMA. 1996 May 22-29;275(20):1557-62
pubmed: 8622246
Eur Heart J. 2017 Oct 7;38(38):2897-2899
pubmed: 29019617
Lancet. 2015 Dec 5;386(10010):2287-323
pubmed: 26364544
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 04;9(8):e103169
pubmed: 25090617
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 10;9(1):13070
pubmed: 31506550
Circulation. 2015 Jan 27;131(4):e29-322
pubmed: 25520374
Lancet. 1979 Apr 21;1(8121):861-5
pubmed: 86103
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):e13-e115
pubmed: 29133356
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Oct;17(10):81
pubmed: 26323874
Curr Hypertens Rev. 2014;10(1):41-8
pubmed: 25392143
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2012 Apr;14(2):124-9
pubmed: 22396196
Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1505-17
pubmed: 24255596
IARC Sci Publ. 1980;(32):5-338
pubmed: 7216345
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16
pubmed: 26551272
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 May 1;104(5):1575-1584
pubmed: 30903690
BMJ. 2016 Aug 09;354:i4098
pubmed: 27511067
J Hypertens Suppl. 1992 Apr;10(2):S17-23
pubmed: 1593299
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 23;18(1):398
pubmed: 29566684
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Dec 11-25;166(22):2437-45
pubmed: 17159008
N Engl J Med. 2008 Apr 10;358(15):1547-59
pubmed: 18378520