Is endoscopic radial artery harvesting open for business?
coronary artery bypass grafting
coronary artery disease
endoscopic harvesting
open harvesting
radial artery
Journal
Journal of cardiac surgery
ISSN: 1540-8191
Titre abrégé: J Card Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8908809
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Sep 2020
Historique:
entrez:
15
1
2021
pubmed:
16
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
With the resurgence of the radial artery in coronary artery bypass grafting, the debate on the optimal harvesting technique continues. Here, we comment on a randomized series in which the authors conclude that endoscopic harvesting techniques offer the benefit of improved cosmetic outcomes and decreased neurological complications with comparable graft-related outcomes when compared with open harvesting. We conclude that although this study is well designed and conducted, there are several areas of concern including surgical technique and statistical power.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2155-2157Informations de copyright
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Tamim M, Alexiou C, Al‐Hassan D, Al‐Faraidy K. Prospective randomized trial of endoscopic vs open radial artery harvest for CABG: clinical outcome, patient satisfaction and mid‐term RA graft patency [published online]. J Card Surg. 2020.
Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. Radial‐artery or saphenous‐vein grafts in coronary‐artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(22):2069‐2077. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, et al. Long‐term patency of 1108 radial arterial‐coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88(1):23‐29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.086
Patel AN, Henry AC, Hunnicutt C, Cockerham CA, Willey B, Urschel HC. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting is better than the open technique. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(1):149‐153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.03.001
Bisleri G, Giroletti L, Hrapkowicz T, et al. Five‐year clinical outcome of endoscopic versus open radial artery harvesting: a propensity score analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(4):1253‐1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.04.006
Navia JL, Brozzi N, Chiu J, et al. Endoscopic versus open radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;53(2):257‐263.
Desai ND, Naylor CD, Kiss A, et al. Impact of patient and target‐vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation. 2007;115(6):684‐691. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.567495
Gaudino MF, Lorusso R, Ohmes LB, et al. Open radial artery harvesting better preserves endothelial function compared to the endoscopic approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019;29(4):561‐567. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivz129
Lopes RD, Hafley GE, Allen KB, et al. Endoscopic versus open vein‐graft harvesting in coronary‐artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(3):235‐244. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0900708
Zenati MA, Shroyer AL, Collins JF, et al. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;141(2):338‐344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004
Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101(2):801‐809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100
Deb S, Cohen EA, RAPS Investigators, et al. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(1):28‐35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.037
Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE, Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency Trial Investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five‐year angiographic follow‐up. Circulation. 2008;117(22):2859‐2864. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.736215
Hayward PAR, Gordon IR, Hare DL, et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(1):60‐65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.09.043
Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, et al. Patency rates of endoscopically harvested radial arteries one year after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134(3):649‐656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.04.008
Burns DJP, Swinamer SA, Fox SA, et al. Long‐term patency of endoscopically harvested radial arteries: from a randomized controlled trial. Innovations. 2015;10(2):77‐84. https://doi.org/10.1097/imi.0000000000000133
Greene MA, Malias MA. Arm complications after radial artery procurement for coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(1):126‐128. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)02680-7
Siminelakis S, Karfis E, Anagnostopoulos C, Toumpoulis I, Katsaraki A, Drossos G. Harvesting radial artery and neurologic complications. J Card Surg. 2004;19(6):505‐510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0886-0440.2004.04090.x
Dick F, Hristic A, Roost‐Krähenbühl E, et al. Persistent sensitivity disorders at the radial artery and saphenous vein graft harvest sites: a neglected side effect of coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40(1):221‐226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.020
Reyes AT, Frame R, Brodman RF. Technique for harvesting the radial artery as a coronary artery bypass graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59(1):118‐126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)00673-U
Simek M, Marcian P, Gwozdziewicz M, Ivo F, Tobbia P, Lonsky V. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. A single center evolving experience. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2013;157(1):64‐69. https://doi.org/10.5507/bp.2012.032
Shapira OM, Eskenazi B, Murphy R, et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: initial clinical experience. Heart Surg Forum. 2004;7(5):E411‐E415. https://doi.org/10.1532/HSF98.20041049
Holman WL, Davies JE, Lin JY, et al. Consequences of radial artery harvest: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. JAMA Surg. 2013:1020‐1023. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3721
Ikizler M, Ozkan S, Dernek S, et al. Does radial artery harvesting for coronary revascularization cause neurological injury in the forearm and hand? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;28(3):420‐424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.06.004
Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, et al. Neurologic sequelae of the donor arm after endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvesting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(3):681‐687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.02.067