Digital Intervention With Lifestyle Coach Support to Target Dietary and Physical Activity Behaviors of Adults With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Systematic Development Process of VITALISE Using Intervention Mapping.
diet
internet-based intervention
lifestyle
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
physical activity
weight loss
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 01 2021
15 01 2021
Historique:
received:
18
06
2020
accepted:
28
10
2020
revised:
05
10
2020
entrez:
15
1
2021
pubmed:
16
1
2021
medline:
1
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is linked to excessive calorie consumption, physical inactivity, and being overweight. Patients with NAFLD can halt or decelerate progression and potentially reverse their condition by changing their lifestyle behavior. International guidelines recommend the use of lifestyle interventions; however, there remains a discordance between published guidelines and clinical practice. This is primarily due to a lack of NAFLD-specific interventions to support weight loss and improve liver function. This study aims to use intervention mapping to systematically develop a digital intervention to support patients with NAFLD to initiate and maintain changes in their dietary and physical activity behavior to promote weight loss. Intervention mapping consisted of 6 steps: step 1 involved a needs assessment with primary and secondary health care professionals (HCPs) and patients with NAFLD; step 2 involved identification of the social cognitive determinants of change and behavioral outcomes of the intervention; step 3 involved linking social cognitive determinants of behavioral outcomes with behavior change techniques to effectively target dietary and physical activity behavior; step 4 involved the development of a prototype digital intervention that integrated the strategies from step 3, and the information content was identified as important for improving knowledge and skills from steps 1 and 2; step 5 involved the development of an implementation plan with a digital provider of lifestyle behavior change programs to patients with NAFLD using their delivery platform and lifestyle coaches; and step 6 involved piloting the digital intervention with patients to obtain data on access, usability, and content. A digital intervention was developed, consisting of 8 modules; self-regulatory tools; and provision of telephone support by trained lifestyle coaches to help facilitate behavioral intention, enactment, and maintenance. A commercial provider of digital lifestyle behavior change programs enrolled 16 patients with NAFLD to the prototype intervention for 12 consecutive weeks. A total of 11 of the 16 participants successfully accessed the intervention and continued to engage with the content following initial log-in (on average 4 times over the piloting period). The most frequently accessed modules were welcome to the program, understanding NAFLD, and food and NAFLD. Goal setting and self-monitoring tools were accessed on 22 occasions (4 times per tool on average). A total of 3 out of 11 participants requested access to a lifestyle coach. Intervention mapping provided a systematic methodological framework to guide a theory- and evidence-informed co-design intervention development process for patients and HCPs. The digital intervention with remote support by a lifestyle coach was acceptable to patients with NAFLD and feasible to deliver. Issues with initial access, optimization of information content, and promoting the value of remote lifestyle coach support require further development ahead of future research to establish intervention effectiveness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is linked to excessive calorie consumption, physical inactivity, and being overweight. Patients with NAFLD can halt or decelerate progression and potentially reverse their condition by changing their lifestyle behavior. International guidelines recommend the use of lifestyle interventions; however, there remains a discordance between published guidelines and clinical practice. This is primarily due to a lack of NAFLD-specific interventions to support weight loss and improve liver function.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to use intervention mapping to systematically develop a digital intervention to support patients with NAFLD to initiate and maintain changes in their dietary and physical activity behavior to promote weight loss.
METHODS
Intervention mapping consisted of 6 steps: step 1 involved a needs assessment with primary and secondary health care professionals (HCPs) and patients with NAFLD; step 2 involved identification of the social cognitive determinants of change and behavioral outcomes of the intervention; step 3 involved linking social cognitive determinants of behavioral outcomes with behavior change techniques to effectively target dietary and physical activity behavior; step 4 involved the development of a prototype digital intervention that integrated the strategies from step 3, and the information content was identified as important for improving knowledge and skills from steps 1 and 2; step 5 involved the development of an implementation plan with a digital provider of lifestyle behavior change programs to patients with NAFLD using their delivery platform and lifestyle coaches; and step 6 involved piloting the digital intervention with patients to obtain data on access, usability, and content.
RESULTS
A digital intervention was developed, consisting of 8 modules; self-regulatory tools; and provision of telephone support by trained lifestyle coaches to help facilitate behavioral intention, enactment, and maintenance. A commercial provider of digital lifestyle behavior change programs enrolled 16 patients with NAFLD to the prototype intervention for 12 consecutive weeks. A total of 11 of the 16 participants successfully accessed the intervention and continued to engage with the content following initial log-in (on average 4 times over the piloting period). The most frequently accessed modules were welcome to the program, understanding NAFLD, and food and NAFLD. Goal setting and self-monitoring tools were accessed on 22 occasions (4 times per tool on average). A total of 3 out of 11 participants requested access to a lifestyle coach.
CONCLUSIONS
Intervention mapping provided a systematic methodological framework to guide a theory- and evidence-informed co-design intervention development process for patients and HCPs. The digital intervention with remote support by a lifestyle coach was acceptable to patients with NAFLD and feasible to deliver. Issues with initial access, optimization of information content, and promoting the value of remote lifestyle coach support require further development ahead of future research to establish intervention effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33448929
pii: v23i1e20491
doi: 10.2196/20491
pmc: PMC7846439
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e20491Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : CAT CL-2013-04-010
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
©Kate Hallsworth, Stuart McPherson, Quentin M Anstee, Darren Flynn, Laura Haigh, Leah Avery. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 15.01.2021.
Références
Transl Behav Med. 2019 Nov 25;9(6):1122-1130
pubmed: 31287897
Ann Behav Med. 2006 Jun;31(3):205-23
pubmed: 16700634
J Hepatol. 2016 Jun;64(6):1388-402
pubmed: 27062661
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):328-357
pubmed: 28714183
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Jan;21(4):1-62
pubmed: 28122658
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
JHEP Rep. 2019 Nov 05;1(6):468-479
pubmed: 32039399
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jun;10(6):330-44
pubmed: 23507799
J Hepatol. 2017 Oct;67(4):829-846
pubmed: 28545937
Hepatology. 2010 Jan;51(1):121-9
pubmed: 19827166
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
Prev Med. 2008 Jul;47(1):3-16
pubmed: 18403003
Transl Behav Med. 2020 Oct 8;10(4):1016-1030
pubmed: 31120519
Gastroenterology. 2015 Aug;149(2):367-78.e5; quiz e14-5
pubmed: 25865049
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 21;10(9):e036382
pubmed: 32958484
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Sep 30;9(3):e26
pubmed: 17942388
J Med Internet Res. 2004 Nov 10;6(4):e40
pubmed: 15631964
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jun;17(7):1364-1371.e3
pubmed: 30391437
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):123-133
pubmed: 28802062
J Hepatol. 2015 May;62(5):1148-55
pubmed: 25477264
Hepatology. 2012 Jun;55(6):2005-23
pubmed: 22488764
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Dec;15(12):1968-1971
pubmed: 28624648
Health Promot Int. 2011 Jun;26(2):148-62
pubmed: 20739325