Conceptualizing and Fostering the Quality of CES Through a Dutch National Network on CES (NEON).
Clinical ethics support
Learning
Quality
Responsive evaluation methodology
Journal
HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues
ISSN: 1572-8498
Titre abrégé: HEC Forum
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8917455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2022
Jun 2022
Historique:
accepted:
04
12
2020
pubmed:
16
1
2021
medline:
1
6
2022
entrez:
15
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The prevalence of Clinical ethics support (CES) services is increasing. Yet, questions about what quality of CES entails and how to foster the quality of CES remain. This paper describes the development of a national network (NEON), which aimed to conceptualize and foster the quality of CES in the Netherlands simultaneously. Our methodology was inspired by a responsive evaluation approach which shares some of our key theoretical presuppositions of CES. A responsive evaluation methodology engages stakeholders in developing quality standards of a certain practice, instead of evaluating a practice by predefined standards. In this paper, we describe the relationship between our theoretical viewpoint on CES and a responsive evaluation methodology. Then we describe the development of the network (NEON) and focus on three activities that exemplify our approach. In the discussion, we reflect on the similarities and differences between our approach and other international initiatives focusing on the quality of CES.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33449233
doi: 10.1007/s10730-020-09432-6
pii: 10.1007/s10730-020-09432-6
pmc: PMC9142414
doi:
Substances chimiques
Neon
4VB4Y46AHD
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
169-186Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Med Health Care Philos. 2019 Sep;22(3):427-438
pubmed: 30684092
Bioethics. 2011 May;25(4):220-7
pubmed: 19860746
BMJ. 2004 Apr 17;328(7445):950-2
pubmed: 15087349
J Med Ethics. 2013 Nov;39(11):681-5
pubmed: 23328983
Am J Bioeth. 2016;16(3):3-14
pubmed: 26913651
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Aug 26;21(1):79
pubmed: 32847572
HEC Forum. 2012 Sep;24(3):187-201
pubmed: 22886154
Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov;16(4):761-74
pubmed: 23709338
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(5):38-51
pubmed: 25970392
Bioethics. 2009 Oct;23(8):460-9
pubmed: 18549426
Ther Umsch. 2008 Jul;65(7):359-65
pubmed: 18622918
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Nov 8;17(1):70
pubmed: 27825344
Bioethics. 2011 Sep;25(7):354-60
pubmed: 21790689
J Med Ethics. 2009 Mar;35(3):147-52
pubmed: 19251963
Bioethics. 2010 Jun;24(5):242-55
pubmed: 20500761
HEC Forum. 2008 Mar;20(1):49-60
pubmed: 18425590
Clin Med (Lond). 2010 Feb;10(1):30-3
pubmed: 20408302
J Clin Ethics. 2012 Fall;23(3):234-40
pubmed: 23256404
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):22-32
pubmed: 34270390
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Nov 1;20(1):78
pubmed: 31675970
HEC Forum. 2014 Jun;26(2):95-109
pubmed: 24078268
Health Care Anal. 2009 Sep;17(3):217-35
pubmed: 19139992
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2011 Jul;20(3):389-95
pubmed: 21676326
J Med Ethics. 2005 Feb;31(2):73-7
pubmed: 15681669
Eval Health Prof. 2005 Mar;28(1):90-109
pubmed: 15677389
J Med Ethics. 2002 Jun;28(3):177-82
pubmed: 12042404
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):985-991
pubmed: 26403297