Evaluation of an OPEN Stewardship generated feedback intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing among primary care veterinarians in Ontario, Canada and Israel: protocol for evaluating usability and an interrupted time-series analysis.
primary care
public health
statistics & research methods
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 01 2021
15 01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
16
1
2021
pubmed:
17
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) impacts the health and well-being of animals, affects animal owners both socially and economically, and contributes to AMR at the human and environmental interface. The overuse and/or inappropriate use of antibiotics in animals has been identified as one of the most important drivers of the development of AMR in animals. Effective antibiotic stewardship interventions such as feedback can be adopted in veterinary practices to improve antibiotic prescribing. However, the provision of dedicated financial and technical resources to implement such systems are challenging. The newly developed web-based Online Platform for Expanding Antibiotic Stewardship (OPEN Stewardship) platform aims to automate the generation of feedback reports and facilitate wider adoption of antibiotic stewardship. This paper describes a protocol to evaluate the usability and usefulness of a feedback intervention among veterinarians and assess its impact on individual antibiotic prescribing. Approximately 80 veterinarians from Ontario, Canada and 60 veterinarians from Israel will be voluntarily enrolled in a controlled interrupted time-series study and their monthly antibiotic prescribing data accessed. The study intervention consists of targeted feedback reports generated using the OPEN Stewardship platform. After a 3-month preintervention period, a cohort of veterinarians (treatment cohort, n=120) will receive three feedback reports over the course of 6 months while the remainder of the veterinarians (n=20) will be the control cohort. A survey will be administered among the treatment cohort after each feedback cycle to assess the usability and usefulness of various elements of the feedback report. A multilevel negative-binomial regression analysis of the preintervention and postintervention antibiotic prescribing of the treatment cohort will be performed to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Research ethics board approval was obtained at each participating site prior to the recruitment of the veterinarians. The study findings will be disseminated through open-access scientific publications, stakeholder networks and national/international meetings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33452187
pii: bmjopen-2020-039760
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039760
pmc: PMC7813311
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e039760Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Implement Sci. 2014 Jun 19;9:77
pubmed: 24943919
J Vet Intern Med. 2017 Mar;31(2):279-294
pubmed: 28185306
JAMA. 2016 Feb 9;315(6):562-70
pubmed: 26864410
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 10;115(15):E3463-E3470
pubmed: 29581252
Vet J. 2019 May;247:8-25
pubmed: 30971357
J Hazard Mater. 2012 Oct 15;235-236:178-85
pubmed: 22868748
Virulence. 2013 Feb 15;4(2):151-7
pubmed: 23302793
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Sep;97(9):5426-36
pubmed: 24997660
Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8 Suppl 2):II2-45
pubmed: 11583120
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 May 5;112(18):5649-54
pubmed: 25792457
Epidemiol Infect. 2012 Dec;140(12):2131-41
pubmed: 22335933
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 13;10:414
pubmed: 20626873
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;36(2):142-52
pubmed: 25632996
Emerg Infect Dis. 2010 Jan;16(1):48-54
pubmed: 20031042
Rev Sci Tech. 2012 Apr;31(1):199-210
pubmed: 22849276
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009 Dec;7(10):1175-83
pubmed: 19968511
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Feb;19(2):e40-e50
pubmed: 30337260
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Feb 1;46(1):348-355
pubmed: 27283160
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001 Jul;45(7):2054-9
pubmed: 11408222
Microb Drug Resist. 2001 Summer;7(2):183-90
pubmed: 11442345
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2017 Jan;70(1):3-24
pubmed: 27353164
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;(4):CD003543
pubmed: 23633313
mBio. 2012 Feb 21;3(1):
pubmed: 22354957
Lancet. 2016 Jan 9;387(10014):e1-3
pubmed: 26603925
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Mar;95(3):1209-21
pubmed: 22365205
Can Vet J. 2019 Mar;60(3):315-318
pubmed: 30872857
Lancet Planet Health. 2017 Nov;1(8):e316-e327
pubmed: 29387833
Lancet. 2016 Jan 9;387(10014):176-87
pubmed: 26603922
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Nov;86(11):3466-72
pubmed: 14672176
Can Vet J. 2012 Mar;53(3):291-8
pubmed: 22942447
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Nov 1;95(11):764-773
pubmed: 29147057
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2002;40:443-65
pubmed: 12147767
J Vet Intern Med. 2018 May;32(3):1092-1099
pubmed: 29573053
Epidemiol Infect. 2017 May;145(7):1320-1325
pubmed: 28215193
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 29;7:10
pubmed: 32083099
J Hazard Mater. 2007 Sep 30;148(3):751-5
pubmed: 17706342
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 08;7:582
pubmed: 33102546
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 10;33(3):376-87
pubmed: 24038204
PLoS Med. 2005 Apr;2(4):e100
pubmed: 15755195
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016 Nov 11;65(6):1-12
pubmed: 27832047
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
Fam Pract. 2000 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S11-6
pubmed: 10735262
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Jun;89(6):1877-95
pubmed: 16702252