No significant difference between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in the gut microbiota of hospitalized patients: A pilot study.


Journal

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases
ISSN: 1878-3511
Titre abrégé: Int J Infect Dis
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9610933

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2021
Historique:
received: 27 11 2020
revised: 05 01 2021
accepted: 11 01 2021
pubmed: 17 1 2021
medline: 11 5 2021
entrez: 16 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime share a similar antibacterial spectrum and similar indications but have different pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ceftriaxone is administered once daily and 40% of its clearance is by biliary elimination, whereas cefotaxime requires three administrations per day and shows less than 10% biliary elimination. The high biliary elimination of ceftriaxone suggests a greater impact of this antibiotic on the gut microbiota than cefotaxime. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime on the gut microbiota. A prospective clinical trial was performed that included 55 patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for at least 3 days. Three fresh stool samples were collected from each patient (days 0, 3, and 7 or at the end of intravenous treatment) to assess the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, toxigenic Clostridioides difficile, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The emergence of 3GC-resistant gram-negative enteric bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae) (5.9% vs 4.7%, p > 0.99), Enterococcus spp, and non-commensal microorganisms did not differ significantly between the groups. Both antibiotics reduced the counts of total gram-negative enteric bacilli and decreased the cultivable diversity of the microbiota, but the differences between the groups were not significant. No significant difference was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in terms of the emergence of resistance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Ceftriaxone and cefotaxime share a similar antibacterial spectrum and similar indications but have different pharmacokinetic characteristics. Ceftriaxone is administered once daily and 40% of its clearance is by biliary elimination, whereas cefotaxime requires three administrations per day and shows less than 10% biliary elimination. The high biliary elimination of ceftriaxone suggests a greater impact of this antibiotic on the gut microbiota than cefotaxime. The objective of this study was to compare the impact of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime on the gut microbiota.
METHODS METHODS
A prospective clinical trial was performed that included 55 patients treated with intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/24 h) or cefotaxime (1 g/8 h) for at least 3 days. Three fresh stool samples were collected from each patient (days 0, 3, and 7 or at the end of intravenous treatment) to assess the emergence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, toxigenic Clostridioides difficile, and vancomycin-resistant enterococci.
RESULTS RESULTS
The emergence of 3GC-resistant gram-negative enteric bacilli (Enterobacteriaceae) (5.9% vs 4.7%, p > 0.99), Enterococcus spp, and non-commensal microorganisms did not differ significantly between the groups. Both antibiotics reduced the counts of total gram-negative enteric bacilli and decreased the cultivable diversity of the microbiota, but the differences between the groups were not significant.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
No significant difference was observed between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime in terms of the emergence of resistance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33453395
pii: S1201-9712(21)00035-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.01.025
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Bacterial Agents 0
Ceftriaxone 75J73V1629
Cefotaxime N2GI8B1GK7

Types de publication

Clinical Trial Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

617-623

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Benoît Pilmis (B)

Équipe Mobile de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France; Service de Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France; Institut Micalis, UMR 1319, Université Paris-Saclay INRAe, AgroParisTech, Chatenay-Malabry, France. Electronic address: bpilmis@hpsj.fr.

Olivier Jiang (O)

Service de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Assaf Mizrahi (A)

Institut Micalis, UMR 1319, Université Paris-Saclay INRAe, AgroParisTech, Chatenay-Malabry, France; Service de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Jean-Claude Nguyen Van (JC)

Service de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Julie Lourtet-Hascoët (J)

Service de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Olivier Voisin (O)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Erwan Le Lorc'h (E)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Sidonie Hubert (S)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Elodie Ménage (E)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Philippe Azria (P)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Marie-Françoise Borie (MF)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Annabelle Mahé (A)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Jean-Jacques Mourad (JJ)

Service de Médecine Interne, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Eloïse Trabattoni (E)

Service d'Accueil des Urgences, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Olivier Ganansia (O)

Service d'Accueil des Urgences, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Jean-Ralph Zahar (JR)

IAME, UMR 1137, Université Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris Cité, France; Service de Microbiologie Clinique et Unité de Contrôle et de Prévention du Risque Infectieux, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Seine Saint-Denis, AP-HP, Bobigny, France.

Alban Le Monnier (A)

Institut Micalis, UMR 1319, Université Paris-Saclay INRAe, AgroParisTech, Chatenay-Malabry, France; Service de Microbiologie Clinique, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH