Mandibular Reconstruction With Block Iliac Crest: An Institutional Experience.
bone
bone transplantation
graft survival
ilium
mandibular reconstruction
Journal
Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction
ISSN: 1943-3875
Titre abrégé: Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101541666
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
1
2021
pubmed:
19
1
2021
medline:
19
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mandibular reconstruction is a challenge. Several reconstructive techniques are available, and the individualization of choice for each patient leads to better results and quality of life for the individual. The aim of this study is to evaluate the characteristics and complications of cases submitted to mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone graft block of the iliac crest. Records of 45 patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction with autogenous bone graft block of the iliac crest were analyzed from January 2000 to December 2014. The data collected included age, gender, etiology and graft size, surgical approach, complications, comorbidities, and habits and addictions. Analysis of variance, chi-square test, and Fisher exact test were used for analysis of the variables with a significance level of The success rate of the 45 charts analyzed was 75.6%. No statistical differences were found between age and presence of complications, between defect size and presence or absence of complications, and between type of surgical approach and presence or absence of complications. According to our study, medical history may influence postoperative complications and require attention, though further studies should be performed to further elucidate the relationship between diseases and postoperative complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33456699
doi: 10.1177/1943387520922763
pii: 10.1177_1943387520922763
pmc: PMC7797981
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
285-289Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000 Jul;58(7):731-7; discussion 738
pubmed: 10883687
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989 Sep;84(3):391-403; discussion 404-5
pubmed: 2762397
J Am Coll Surg. 2001 Oct;193(4):407-16
pubmed: 11584969
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Aug;17(4):779-89
pubmed: 24172127
Implant Dent. 2005 Dec;14(4):357-61
pubmed: 16361886
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Oct;19(10):1074-80
pubmed: 18828825
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jul;67(7):1446-52
pubmed: 19531416
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Nov;70(11 Suppl 3):e272-309
pubmed: 23128004
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Aug;106(2):191-202
pubmed: 18547843
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;54(3):322-6
pubmed: 26805463
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Sep;23(5):1373-4
pubmed: 22948642
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):654-9
pubmed: 22137760
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;73(3):541-9
pubmed: 25683044
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 Nov;55(11):1200-6
pubmed: 9371107
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Apr;48(4):336-46; discussion 347
pubmed: 2313441
Head Neck. 1999 Jan;21(1):66-71
pubmed: 9890353
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Jul;37(7):597-605
pubmed: 18450424