Analysis of Online Urologist Ratings: Are Rating Differences Associated With Subspecialty?
online physician ratings
subspecialty
urology
Journal
Journal of patient experience
ISSN: 2374-3735
Titre abrégé: J Patient Exp
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101688338
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez:
18
1
2021
pubmed:
19
1
2021
medline:
19
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients are increasingly using online rating websites to obtain information about physicians and to provide feedback. We performed an analysis of urologist online ratings, with specific focus on the relationship between overall rating and urologist subspecialty. We conducted an analysis of urologist ratings on Healthgrades.com. Ratings were sampled across 4 US geographical regions, with focus across 3 practice types (large and small private practice, academic) and 7 urologic subspecialties. Statistical analysis was performed to assess for differences among subgroup ratings. Data were analyzed for 954 urologists with a mean age of 53 (±10) years. The median overall urologist rating was 4.0 [3.4-4.7]. Providers in an academic practice type or robotics/oncology subspecialty had statistically significantly higher ratings when compared to other practice settings or subspecialties (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33457546
doi: 10.1177/2374373520951901
pii: 10.1177_2374373520951901
pmc: PMC7786750
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1062-1067Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2020.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 09;20(5):e176
pubmed: 29743150
Interact J Med Res. 2018 Apr 09;7(1):e8
pubmed: 29631992
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 16;13(4):e95
pubmed: 22088924
Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):659-64
pubmed: 19461833
Acad Med. 2005 May;80(5):458-66
pubmed: 15851459
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Jun;25(6):404-13
pubmed: 26464518
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Jul;140(7):635-8
pubmed: 24876073
Pain Physician. 2019 Sep;22(5):E477-E486
pubmed: 31561660
Acad Med. 2012 Jun;87(6):701-8
pubmed: 22534588
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Apr 08;21(4):e12521
pubmed: 30958276
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Jan;66(1):16-20
pubmed: 22171901
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Aug;63(4):899-910
pubmed: 16530904
JAMA. 1992 Oct 7;268(13):1709-14
pubmed: 1527880
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Feb 24;14(1):e38
pubmed: 22366336
Singapore Med J. 2012 Jan;53(1):52-6
pubmed: 22252184
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Sep;33(9):1680-8
pubmed: 25122562
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Jan 11;:1-4
pubmed: 30641854
Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):592-8; discussion 598-600
pubmed: 25203875
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(12):e324
pubmed: 27965191
J Patient Exp. 2017 Dec;4(4):177-184
pubmed: 29276764
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Mar 07;20(3):e76
pubmed: 29514775
JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):734-5
pubmed: 24549555
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 07;10:332
pubmed: 21138579
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar/Apr;24(2):109-114
pubmed: 29474282
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jun 15;43(12):E722-E726
pubmed: 29846366
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Jul/Aug;23(4):244-249
pubmed: 28106648
JMIR Cancer. 2019 Apr 01;5(1):e10530
pubmed: 30932863