Risk prediction of atrial fibrillation in the community combining biomarkers and genetics.
Atrial fibrillation
Biomarkers
Community
Epidemiology
Genetics
Polygenic risk score
Risk Prediction
Journal
Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-2092
Titre abrégé: Europace
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883649
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 05 2021
21 05 2021
Historique:
received:
02
08
2020
accepted:
08
10
2020
pubmed:
19
1
2021
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
18
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Classical cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs), biomarkers, and common genetic variation have been suggested for risk assessment of atrial fibrillation (AF). To evaluate their clinical potential, we analysed their individual and combined ability of AF prediction. In N = 6945 individuals of the FINRISK 1997 cohort, we assessed the predictive value of CVRF, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and 145 recently identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) combined in a developed polygenic risk score (PRS) for incident AF. Over a median follow-up of 17.8 years, n = 551 participants (7.9%) developed AF. In multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, NT-proBNP [hazard ratio (HR) of log transformed values 4.77; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.66-6.22; P < 0.001] and the PRS (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.88-2.53; P < 0.001) were significantly related to incident AF. The discriminatory ability improved asymptotically with increasing numbers of SNPs. Compared with a clinical model, AF risk prediction was significantly improved by addition of NT-proBNP and the PRS. The C-statistic for the combination of CVRF, NT-proBNP, and the PRS reached 0.83 compared with 0.79 for CVRF only (P < 0.001). A replication in the Dutch Prevention of REnal and Vascular ENd-stage Disease (PREVEND) cohort revealed similar results. Comparing the highest vs. lowest quartile, NT-proBNP and the PRS both showed a more than three-fold increased AF risk. Age remained the strongest risk factor with a 16.7-fold increased risk of AF in the highest quartile. The PRS and the established biomarker NT-proBNP showed comparable predictive ability. Both provided incremental predictive value over standard clinical variables. Further improvements for the PRS are likely with the discovery of additional SNPs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33458771
pii: 6103216
doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa334
pmc: PMC8139818
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Peptide Fragments
0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
674-681Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44(3):303-8
pubmed: 24372567
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1234-1239
pubmed: 30061737
Lancet. 2015 Jul 11;386(9989):154-62
pubmed: 25960110
Nat Genet. 2017 Jun;49(6):946-952
pubmed: 28416818
Can J Cardiol. 2016 Nov;32(11):1300-1305
pubmed: 27094126
PLoS Genet. 2016 Sep 02;12(9):e1006284
pubmed: 27589061
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40922
pubmed: 22848412
Heart. 2017 Aug;103(16):1271-1277
pubmed: 28255099
Circulation. 2018 Mar 6;137(10):1027-1038
pubmed: 29129827
Clin Chem. 2009 Feb;55(2):305-12
pubmed: 19095726
Europace. 2014 Oct;16(10):1426-33
pubmed: 25037055
Circulation. 2017 Apr 4;135(14):1311-1320
pubmed: 27793994
Circulation. 2017 Oct 24;136(17):1588-1597
pubmed: 29038167
Nat Genet. 2018 Sep;50(9):1225-1233
pubmed: 29892015
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2274-84
pubmed: 23563134
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015 Feb;8(1):25-31
pubmed: 25567478
Clin Chem. 2009 May;55(5):923-9
pubmed: 19299545
Eur Heart J. 2013 May;34(19):1424-31
pubmed: 23470495
PLoS Med. 2018 Mar 13;15(3):e1002525
pubmed: 29534064
Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(29):2243-51
pubmed: 23444395