Group experiences of cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) in Tanzania: a qualitative study.
Cognitive stimulation
Dementia and Cognitive Disorders
Group Therapy
Low-resource Mental Health Interventions
Tanzania
Journal
Aging & mental health
ISSN: 1364-6915
Titre abrégé: Aging Ment Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9705773
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
19
1
2021
medline:
26
4
2022
entrez:
18
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Tanzania is a low-income country in which medication for dementia is largely unavailable. Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) is a group-based psychological treatment for people with dementia (PwD), shown to improve cognition and quality of life (QoL). It has previously been culturally adapted and piloted in Tanzania, shown to produce similar outcomes. UK research into CST suggests processes inherent to the group nature are key to its success. This study sought to identify group processes within CST in Tanzania and understand their impact on CST principles and outcomes. Data collection took place in rural Hai District, through qualitative semi-structured interviews. Sixteen PwD and four facilitators were recruited through convenience sampling and interviewed about their experiences of CST. Interviews were audio-recorded, translated, transcribed and analysed by thematic analysis. Two main themes emerged: 'Positive group experiences' and 'Negative group experiences'. From this, a number of group processes were identified, such as helping behaviours and feeling understood by the group. Positive processes supported CST principles and participant improvement. Facilitators were influential over group dynamics. The group processes identified impacted CST principles and treatment outcomes. This is the first study on group mechanisms of CST in Tanzania. It provides deeper insight into participants' experiences of CST, thus identifying specific processes underlying the quantitatively measured positive outcomes of CST in Tanzania by previous studies. It also reveals further cultural barriers to implementation, enabling amendments for optimization of treatment efficacy.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Tanzania is a low-income country in which medication for dementia is largely unavailable. Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (CST) is a group-based psychological treatment for people with dementia (PwD), shown to improve cognition and quality of life (QoL). It has previously been culturally adapted and piloted in Tanzania, shown to produce similar outcomes. UK research into CST suggests processes inherent to the group nature are key to its success. This study sought to identify group processes within CST in Tanzania and understand their impact on CST principles and outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
Data collection took place in rural Hai District, through qualitative semi-structured interviews. Sixteen PwD and four facilitators were recruited through convenience sampling and interviewed about their experiences of CST. Interviews were audio-recorded, translated, transcribed and analysed by thematic analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Two main themes emerged: 'Positive group experiences' and 'Negative group experiences'. From this, a number of group processes were identified, such as helping behaviours and feeling understood by the group. Positive processes supported CST principles and participant improvement. Facilitators were influential over group dynamics. The group processes identified impacted CST principles and treatment outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study on group mechanisms of CST in Tanzania. It provides deeper insight into participants' experiences of CST, thus identifying specific processes underlying the quantitatively measured positive outcomes of CST in Tanzania by previous studies. It also reveals further cultural barriers to implementation, enabling amendments for optimization of treatment efficacy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33459046
doi: 10.1080/13607863.2021.1872489
pmc: PMC8959386
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
688-697Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/S004009/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Dementia (London). 2018 May;17(4):515-530
pubmed: 27328694
Neurobiol Aging. 1991 Jul-Aug;12(4):317-24
pubmed: 1755879
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Oct;23(10):1377-1381
pubmed: 30246561
Age Ageing. 2013 Jan;42(1):124-8
pubmed: 23027519
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;20(4):332-43
pubmed: 18925482
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Nov;29(11):1869-1878
pubmed: 28701238
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Jun;29(6):990
pubmed: 28367785
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;188:574-80
pubmed: 16738349
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Sep;183:248-54
pubmed: 12948999
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Nov;15(8):945-9
pubmed: 21722044
Aging Ment Health. 2006 May;10(3):219-26
pubmed: 16777649
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Oct;23(10):1400-1404
pubmed: 30444133
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Jun;25(6):991-998
pubmed: 32272849
BMC Geriatr. 2015 Apr 25;15:53
pubmed: 25908439
Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:1-26
pubmed: 16318587
Dementia (London). 2017 Nov;16(8):985-1003
pubmed: 26787748
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15;(2):CD005562
pubmed: 22336813
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;33(6):841-848
pubmed: 29717527
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Jul;28(7):728-37
pubmed: 22996739
PLoS Med. 2017 Mar 28;14(3):e1002269
pubmed: 28350796
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):669-70
pubmed: 26692985
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;31(11):1199-1207
pubmed: 26833889