Adherence, persistence and efficacy of dasatinib and nilotinib in the treatment of patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic phase: an Italian multicenter study over two years in real life.
Dasatinib
chronic myeloid leukaemia
drug used study
effectiveness
medication adherence
nilotinib
persistence
Journal
Current medical research and opinion
ISSN: 1473-4877
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Res Opin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0351014
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2021
03 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
19
1
2021
medline:
16
10
2021
entrez:
18
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The use of dasatinib and nilotinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia represents a valid therapeutic option for patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. In this multicentre study, adherence, persistence and efficacy in real life over two years of treatment were evaluated. Adherence to treatment was calculated as the ratio between the dose received and the prescribed dose. The dose received was calculated using pharmacy refill data. The persistence with treatment was calculated as the difference between the end and the beginning of the treatment. Efficacy was assigned as Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Events-Free Survival (EFS) and represented through the Kaplan-Meier curve. The number of patients analysed was 117, 70 treated with dasatinib and 47 with nilotinib. Adherence to treatment for dasatinib and nilotinib at two years was 0.91 and 0.82 respectively. Persistence at two years was 77% while the PFS was 92% for both drugs in the study. Adherence to the treatment calculated over two years showed a superiority of dasatinib over nilotinib. Nevertheless, the efficacy in terms of PFS and EFS is superimposable between the two drugs in the study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The use of dasatinib and nilotinib in the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia represents a valid therapeutic option for patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib. In this multicentre study, adherence, persistence and efficacy in real life over two years of treatment were evaluated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Adherence to treatment was calculated as the ratio between the dose received and the prescribed dose. The dose received was calculated using pharmacy refill data. The persistence with treatment was calculated as the difference between the end and the beginning of the treatment. Efficacy was assigned as Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Events-Free Survival (EFS) and represented through the Kaplan-Meier curve.
RESULTS
The number of patients analysed was 117, 70 treated with dasatinib and 47 with nilotinib. Adherence to treatment for dasatinib and nilotinib at two years was 0.91 and 0.82 respectively. Persistence at two years was 77% while the PFS was 92% for both drugs in the study.
CONCLUSION
Adherence to the treatment calculated over two years showed a superiority of dasatinib over nilotinib. Nevertheless, the efficacy in terms of PFS and EFS is superimposable between the two drugs in the study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33459083
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1876006
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Pyrimidines
0
Thiazoles
0
Imatinib Mesylate
8A1O1M485B
nilotinib
F41401512X
Dasatinib
RBZ1571X5H
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM