Penetrating Vertebral Artery Injuries: A Literature Review and Proposed Treatment Algorithm.

Penetrating neck trauma Penetrating vertebral artery injury Systematic review Traumatic treatment algorithm Vertebral artery Vertebral artery injury

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 04 12 2020
revised: 05 01 2021
accepted: 06 01 2021
pubmed: 19 1 2021
medline: 23 7 2021
entrez: 18 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Penetrating vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) are rare but devastating trauma for which the approach to treatment varies greatly. The literature on treatment modalities is limited to case reports, case series, and 1 review, with the majority of cases being treated surgically. However, with the advent of digital subtraction angiography, treatment has shifted toward less invasive endovascular modalities that allows one to assess the flow and risks of sacrificing the vertebral artery (VA). In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic review of VAI was performed. Two case reports were also detailed. Using a multidisciplinary team, a decision algorithm was proposed for approaching penetrating VAIs. We identified 169 patients. Of the penetrating VAI, the majority were occlusions, most commonly managed conservatively. Other injuries including pseudoaneurysm, dissection, transection, and arterial-venous fistula were treated predominantly endovascularly and occasionally with the surgical exploration/ligation. Most endovascular treatments included embolization without significant stroke or complication from VA sacrifice. However, there are incidences in which VA sacrifice should be avoided and these scenarios can be better delineated with digital subtraction angiography to assess flow and anatomy. This systematic review not only details the updated treatment options but also provides a decision algorithm for the treatment of penetrating VAI. It highlights the shifting treatment options of penetrating VAI to endovascular therapy, as well as details VAI variants that may suggest stenting over embolization.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Penetrating vertebral artery injuries (VAIs) are rare but devastating trauma for which the approach to treatment varies greatly. The literature on treatment modalities is limited to case reports, case series, and 1 review, with the majority of cases being treated surgically. However, with the advent of digital subtraction angiography, treatment has shifted toward less invasive endovascular modalities that allows one to assess the flow and risks of sacrificing the vertebral artery (VA).
METHODS
In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses, a systematic review of VAI was performed. Two case reports were also detailed. Using a multidisciplinary team, a decision algorithm was proposed for approaching penetrating VAIs.
RESULTS
We identified 169 patients. Of the penetrating VAI, the majority were occlusions, most commonly managed conservatively. Other injuries including pseudoaneurysm, dissection, transection, and arterial-venous fistula were treated predominantly endovascularly and occasionally with the surgical exploration/ligation. Most endovascular treatments included embolization without significant stroke or complication from VA sacrifice. However, there are incidences in which VA sacrifice should be avoided and these scenarios can be better delineated with digital subtraction angiography to assess flow and anatomy.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review not only details the updated treatment options but also provides a decision algorithm for the treatment of penetrating VAI. It highlights the shifting treatment options of penetrating VAI to endovascular therapy, as well as details VAI variants that may suggest stenting over embolization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33460818
pii: S1878-8750(21)00042-5
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e518-e526

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Keaton Piper (K)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA. Electronic address: Keatonpiper@usf.edu.

Maximilian Rabil (M)

Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

David Ciesla (D)

Department of Trauma and Emergency General Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Sivero Agazzi (S)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Zeguang Ren (Z)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Maxim Mokin (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Waldo R Guerrero (WR)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH