Coculture with hemicellulose-fermenting microbes reverses inhibition of corn fiber solubilization by Clostridium thermocellum at elevated solids loadings.
Journal
Biotechnology for biofuels
ISSN: 1754-6834
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jan 2021
18 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
04
09
2020
accepted:
24
12
2020
entrez:
19
1
2021
pubmed:
20
1
2021
medline:
20
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The cellulolytic thermophile Clostridium thermocellum is an important biocatalyst due to its ability to solubilize lignocellulosic feedstocks without the need for pretreatment or exogenous enzyme addition. At low concentrations of substrate, C. thermocellum can solubilize corn fiber > 95% in 5 days, but solubilization declines markedly at substrate concentrations higher than 20 g/L. This differs for model cellulose like Avicel, on which the maximum solubilization rate increases in proportion to substrate concentration. The goal of this study was to examine fermentation at increasing corn fiber concentrations and investigate possible reasons for declining performance. The rate of growth of C. thermocellum on corn fiber, inferred from CipA scaffoldin levels measured by LC-MS/MS, showed very little increase with increasing solids loading. To test for inhibition, we evaluated the effects of spent broth on growth and cellulase activity. The liquids remaining after corn fiber fermentation were found to be strongly inhibitory to growth on cellobiose, a substrate that does not require cellulose hydrolysis. Additionally, the hydrolytic activity of C. thermocellum cellulase was also reduced to less-than half by adding spent broth. Noting that > 15 g/L hemicellulose oligosaccharides accumulated in the spent broth of a 40 g/L corn fiber fermentation, we tested the effect of various model carbohydrates on growth on cellobiose and Avicel. Some compounds like xylooligosaccharides caused a decline in cellulolytic activity and a reduction in the maximum solubilization rate on Avicel. However, there were no relevant model compounds that could replicate the strong inhibition by spent broth on C. thermocellum growth on cellobiose. Cocultures of C. thermocellum with hemicellulose-consuming partners-Herbinix spp. strain LL1355 and Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum-exhibited lower levels of unfermented hemicellulose hydrolysis products, a doubling of the maximum solubilization rate, and final solubilization increased from 67 to 93%. This study documents inhibition of C. thermocellum with increasing corn fiber concentration and demonstrates inhibition of cellulase activity by xylooligosaccharides, but further work is needed to understand why growth on cellobiose was inhibited by corn fiber fermentation broth. Our results support the importance of hemicellulose-utilizing coculture partners to augment C. thermocellum in the fermentation of lignocellulosic feedstocks at high solids loading.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The cellulolytic thermophile Clostridium thermocellum is an important biocatalyst due to its ability to solubilize lignocellulosic feedstocks without the need for pretreatment or exogenous enzyme addition. At low concentrations of substrate, C. thermocellum can solubilize corn fiber > 95% in 5 days, but solubilization declines markedly at substrate concentrations higher than 20 g/L. This differs for model cellulose like Avicel, on which the maximum solubilization rate increases in proportion to substrate concentration. The goal of this study was to examine fermentation at increasing corn fiber concentrations and investigate possible reasons for declining performance.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The rate of growth of C. thermocellum on corn fiber, inferred from CipA scaffoldin levels measured by LC-MS/MS, showed very little increase with increasing solids loading. To test for inhibition, we evaluated the effects of spent broth on growth and cellulase activity. The liquids remaining after corn fiber fermentation were found to be strongly inhibitory to growth on cellobiose, a substrate that does not require cellulose hydrolysis. Additionally, the hydrolytic activity of C. thermocellum cellulase was also reduced to less-than half by adding spent broth. Noting that > 15 g/L hemicellulose oligosaccharides accumulated in the spent broth of a 40 g/L corn fiber fermentation, we tested the effect of various model carbohydrates on growth on cellobiose and Avicel. Some compounds like xylooligosaccharides caused a decline in cellulolytic activity and a reduction in the maximum solubilization rate on Avicel. However, there were no relevant model compounds that could replicate the strong inhibition by spent broth on C. thermocellum growth on cellobiose. Cocultures of C. thermocellum with hemicellulose-consuming partners-Herbinix spp. strain LL1355 and Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum-exhibited lower levels of unfermented hemicellulose hydrolysis products, a doubling of the maximum solubilization rate, and final solubilization increased from 67 to 93%.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study documents inhibition of C. thermocellum with increasing corn fiber concentration and demonstrates inhibition of cellulase activity by xylooligosaccharides, but further work is needed to understand why growth on cellobiose was inhibited by corn fiber fermentation broth. Our results support the importance of hemicellulose-utilizing coculture partners to augment C. thermocellum in the fermentation of lignocellulosic feedstocks at high solids loading.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33461608
doi: 10.1186/s13068-020-01867-w
pii: 10.1186/s13068-020-01867-w
pmc: PMC7814735
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
24Références
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009 Jun 08;2(1):11
pubmed: 19505292
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2011 Jan 5;48(1):54-60
pubmed: 22112771
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 23;7:43355
pubmed: 28230109
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982 May;43(5):1125-32
pubmed: 16346009
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Sep;66(3):506-77, table of contents
pubmed: 12209002
Sci China C Life Sci. 2004 Feb;47(1):18-24
pubmed: 15382672
Biochem J. 2012 Mar 1;442(2):241-52
pubmed: 22329798
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 Nov 30;10:233
pubmed: 29213307
Can J Microbiol. 2019 Apr;65(4):296-307
pubmed: 30608879
J Bacteriol. 1983 Nov;156(2):828-36
pubmed: 6195146
Biotechnol Bioeng. 1989 Jun 20;34(2):223-33
pubmed: 18588096
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jan;103(1):293-9
pubmed: 22055095
Bioresour Technol. 2014;152:384-92
pubmed: 24316482
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014 Jul;111(7):1341-53
pubmed: 24522973
J Bacteriol. 2013 Feb;195(4):733-9
pubmed: 23204466
Nat Commun. 2020 Apr 22;11(1):1937
pubmed: 32321909
FEBS J. 2015 Jun;282(11):2167-77
pubmed: 25765184
Methods Enzymol. 2012;510:317-30
pubmed: 22608734
Annu Rev Biochem. 2010;79:655-81
pubmed: 20373916
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;100(6):2907-15
pubmed: 26762388
J Proteome Res. 2011 Sep 2;10(9):3871-9
pubmed: 21761931
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Dec;77(23):8288-94
pubmed: 21965408
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;39(6):943-7
pubmed: 22350066
Anal Biochem. 1984 Apr;138(1):141-3
pubmed: 6731838
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Apr 1;96(5):862-70
pubmed: 16865734
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Nov 18;7(1):136
pubmed: 25426163
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020 Jan 21;86(3):
pubmed: 31704686
Bioresour Technol. 2017 Dec;245(Pt A):511-517
pubmed: 28898851
Nat Methods. 2007 Nov;4(11):923-5
pubmed: 17952086
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Oct 21;7(1):155
pubmed: 25379055
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 1999 Feb;76(2):65-77
pubmed: 15304728
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Sep 21;6(1):135
pubmed: 24053778
Nat Methods. 2016 Nov 29;13(12):964-966
pubmed: 27898063
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 05;2(2):e1501254
pubmed: 26989779
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017 Jun;45:202-211
pubmed: 28528086
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012 Jun;23(3):396-405
pubmed: 22176748
J Proteome Res. 2008 Feb;7(2):731-40
pubmed: 18183947
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015 Nov 26;8:195
pubmed: 26617670
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020 Mar 10;13:40
pubmed: 32175007
J Biol Eng. 2012 May 11;6(1):5
pubmed: 22578246
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Dec;101(24):9624-30
pubmed: 20708404