Energetic efficiency of foraging mediates bee niche partitioning.
body size
competitive exclusion
energetics
functional traits
niche partitioning
optimal foraging
realized niche/bees
Journal
Ecology
ISSN: 1939-9170
Titre abrégé: Ecology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0043541
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2021
04 2021
Historique:
revised:
08
12
2020
received:
23
07
2020
accepted:
11
01
2021
pubmed:
20
1
2021
medline:
27
4
2021
entrez:
19
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Revitalizing our understanding of species distributions and assembly in community ecology requires greater use of functional (physiological) approaches based on quantifiable factors such as energetics. Here, we explore niche partitioning between bumble and honey bees by comparing a measure of within-patch foraging efficiency, the ratio of flower visitation rate (proportional to energy gain) to body mass (energy cost). This explained a remarkable 74% of the variation in the proportions of bumble to honey bees across 22 plant species and was confirmed using detailed energy calculations. Bumble bees visited flowers at a greater rate (realizing greater energy benefits) than honey bees, but were heavier (incurring greater energy costs) and predominated only on plant species where their benefit : cost ratio was higher than for honey bees. Importantly, the competition between honey bees and bumble bees had no consistent winner, thus highlighting the importance of plant diversity to the coexistence of competing bees. By contrast, tongue : corolla-tube-length ratio explained only 7% of the variation (non-significant). Our results confirm the importance of energetics in understanding community ecology and bee foraging niche and highlight the energetic tightrope navigated by foraging bees, since approximately half the nectar energy gained was expended in its collection.
Substances chimiques
Plant Nectar
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e03285Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors. Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Ecological Society of America.
Références
Balfour, N. J. 2011. Floral choice in bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea): Do honeybees prefer borage (Borago officinalis) and bumblebees lavender (Lavandula spp.)? Dissertation. Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park, Imperial College, London, UK.
Balfour, N. J., K. A. Fensome, E. E. Samuelson, and F. L. Ratnieks. 2015b. Following the dance: ground survey of flowers and flower-visiting insects in a summer foraging hotspot identified via honey bee waggle dance decoding. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 213:265-271.
Balfour, N. J., S. Gandy, and F. L. Ratnieks. 2015a. Exploitative competition alters bee foraging and flower choice. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69:1731-1738.
Balfour, N. J., M. Garbuzov, and F. L. W. Ratnieks. 2013. Longer tongues and swifter handling: why do more bumble bees (Bombus spp.) than honey bees (Apis mellifera) forage on lavender (Lavandula spp.)? Ecological Entomology 38:323-329.
Balfour, N. J., J. Ollerton, M. C. Castellanos, and F. L. Ratnieks. 2018. British phenological records indicate high diversity and extinction rates among late-summer-flying pollinators. Biological Conservation 222:278-283.
Bertsch, A. 1984. Foraging in male bumblebees (Bombus lucorum L.): maximizing energy or minimizing water load? Oecologia 62:325-336.
Blonder, B. 2017. Hypervolume concepts in niche- and trait-based ecology. Ecography 41:1441-1455.
Brown, J. H., J. F. Gillooly, A. P. Allen, V. M. Savage, and G. B. West. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771-1789.
Charlton, N. L., and A. I. Houston. 2010. What currency do bumble bees maximize? PLoS ONE 5:e12186.
Corbet, S. A., N. M. Saville, M. Fussell, O. E. Prŷs-Jones, and D. M. Unwin. 1995. The competition box: a graphical aid to forecasting pollinator performance. Journal of Applied Ecology 32:707-719.
Couvillon, M. J., C. M. Walter, E. M. Blows, T. J. Czaczkes, K. L. Alton, and F. L. W. Ratnieks. 2015. Busy bees: variation in insect flower-visiting rates across multiple plant species. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology 134630.
Eklöf et al. 2013. The dimensionality of ecological networks. Ecology Letters 16:577-583.
Full, R. J. 1997. Invertebrate locomotor systems. Handbook of physiology-comparative physiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Garbuzov, M., and F. L. W. Ratnieks. 2013. Quantifying variation among garden plants in attractiveness to bees and other flower-visiting insects. Functional Ecology 28:364-374.
González-Gómez, P. L., R. A. Vásquez, and F. Bozinovic. 2011. Flexibility of foraging behavior in hummingbirds: the role of energy constraints and cognitive abilities. Auk 128:36-42.
Greenleaf, S. S., N. M. Williams, R. Winfree, and C. Kremen. 2007. Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia 153:589-596.
Hansen, D. M., J. M. Olesen, and C. G. Jones. 2002. Trees, birds and bees in Mauritius: exploitative competition between introduced honey bees and endemic nectarivorous birds? Journal of Biogeography 29:721-734.
Harder, L. D. 1985. Morphology as a predictor of flower choice by bumble bees. Ecology 66:198-210.
Heinrich, B. 1979. Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, London, UK.
Huryn, V. M. B. 1997. Ecological impacts of introduced honey bees. Quarterly Review of Biology 72:275-297.
Keasar, T., A. Sadeh, and A. Shmida. 2008. Variability in nectar production and standing crop, and their relation to pollinator visits in a Mediterranean shrub. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 2:117-123.
Kéfi, S., V. Miele, E. A. Wieters, S. A. Navarrete, and E. L. Berlow. 2016. How structured is the entangled bank? The surprisingly simple organization of multiplex ecological networks leads to increased persistence and resilience. PLoS Biology 14:e1002527.
Lach, L. 2008. Floral visitation patterns of two invasive ant species and their effects on other hymenopteran visitors. Ecological Entomology 33:155-160.
Levine, J. M., J. Bascompte, P. B. Adler, and S. Allesina. 2017. Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546:56-64.
McGill, B. J., B. J. Enquist, E. Weiher, and M. Westoby. 2006. Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:178-185.
Mittelbach, G. G., and B. J. McGill. 2019. Community ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Murray, M. G., and D. Brown. 1993. Niche separation of grazing ungulates in the Serengeti. An experimental test. Journal of Animal Ecology 62:380-389.
Ribbands, C. R. 1949. The foraging method of individual honey-bees. Journal of Animal Ecology 18:47-66.
Roubik, D. W. 1978. Competitive interactions between neotropical pollinators and Africanized honey bees. Science 201:1030-1032.
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/
Seeley, T. D. 1994. Honey bee foragers as sensory units of their colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 34(1): 51-62.
Seeley, T. D. 1996. The wisdom of the hive: the social physioloy of honey bee colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Southwick, E. E., and A. K. Southwick. 1986. Nectar characteristics and phenology of spring bee plants in northwestern New York. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 16:55-62.
Steffan-Dewenter, I., and T. Tscharntke. 2000. Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central Europe. Oecologia 122:288-296.
Valido, A., M. C. Rodríguez-Rodríguez, and P. Jordano. 2019. Honey Bees disrupt the structure and functionality of plant-pollinator networks. Scientific Reports 9:4711.
Wang, X., Y. Zhang, M. Zhao, L. Cao, and A. D. Fox. 2013. The benefits of being big: effects of body size on energy budgets of three wintering goose species grazing Carex beds in the Yangtze River floodplain, China. Journal of Ornithology 154:1095-1103.
Wilmer, P. 2011. Pollination and floral ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Wilmshurst, J. F., J. M. Fryxell, and C. M. Bergman. 2000. The allometry of patch selection in ruminants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 267:345-349.
Withee, J. R., and S. M. Rehan. 2016. Cumulative effects of body size and social experience on aggressive behaviour in a subsocial bee. Behaviour 153:1365-1385.
Wojcik, V. A., L. A. Morandin, L. Davies Adams, and K. E. Rourke. 2018. Floral resource competition between honey bees and wild bees: Is there clear evidence and can we guide management and conservation? Environmental Entomology 47:822-833.
Zeileis, A., F. Cribari-Neto, B. Gruen, I. Kosmidis, A. B. Simas, A. V. Rocha, and M. A. Zeileis. 2018. Package betareg. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=betareg