Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Persons: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.


Journal

JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2021
Historique:
entrez: 19 1 2021
pubmed: 20 1 2021
medline: 9 2 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of disease, disability, and death in the US. In 2014, it was estimated that 480 000 deaths annually are attributed to cigarette smoking, including second hand smoke exposure. Smoking during pregnancy can increase the risk of numerous adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, miscarriage and congenital anomalies) and complications in the offspring (including sudden infant death syndrome and impaired lung function in childhood). In 2019, an estimated 50.6 million US adults (20.8% of the adult population) used tobacco; 14.0% of the US adult population currently smoked cigarettes and 4.5% of the adult population used electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). Among pregnant US women who gave birth in 2016, 7.2% reported smoking cigarettes while pregnant. To update its 2015 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a review to evaluate the benefits and harms of primary care interventions on tobacco use cessation in adults, including pregnant persons. This recommendation statement applies to adults 18 years or older, including pregnant persons. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the net benefit of behavioral interventions and US Food and Drug Associated (FDA)-approved pharmacotherapy for tobacco smoking cessation, alone or combined, in nonpregnant adults who smoke is substantial. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the net benefit of behavioral interventions for tobacco smoking cessation on perinatal outcomes and smoking cessation in pregnant persons is substantial. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence on pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in pregnant persons is insufficient because few studies are available, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence on the use of e-cigarettes for tobacco smoking cessation in adults, including pregnant persons, is insufficient, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. The USPSTF has identified the lack of well-designed, randomized clinical trials on e-cigarettes that report smoking abstinence or adverse events as a critical gap in the evidence. The USPSTF recommends that clinicians ask all adults about tobacco use, advise them to stop using tobacco, and provide behavioral interventions and FDA-approved pharmacotherapy for cessation to nonpregnant adults who use tobacco. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends that clinicians ask all pregnant persons about tobacco use, advise them to stop using tobacco, and provide behavioral interventions for cessation to pregnant persons who use tobacco. (A recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco cessation in pregnant persons. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of e-cigarettes for tobacco cessation in adults, including pregnant persons. The USPSTF recommends that clinicians direct patients who use tobacco to other tobacco cessation interventions with proven effectiveness and established safety. (I statement).

Identifiants

pubmed: 33464343
pii: 2775287
doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.25019
doi:

Substances chimiques

Smoking Cessation Agents 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Practice Guideline

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

265-279

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Alex H Krist (AH)

Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia.
Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

Karina W Davidson (KW)

Feinstein Institute for Medical Research at Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York.

Carol M Mangione (CM)

University of California, Los Angeles.

Michael J Barry (MJ)

Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Michael Cabana (M)

University of California, San Francisco.

Aaron B Caughey (AB)

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Katrina Donahue (K)

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Chyke A Doubeni (CA)

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

John W Epling (JW)

Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke.

Martha Kubik (M)

George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

Gbenga Ogedegbe (G)

New York University, New York, New York.

Lori Pbert (L)

University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

Michael Silverstein (M)

Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Melissa A Simon (MA)

Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

Chien-Wen Tseng (CW)

University of Hawaii, Honolulu.
Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii.

John B Wong (JB)

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH